This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The judge presiding over the long-running copyright litigation between Thomson Reuters and Ross Intelligence today issued a memorandum opinion explaining his April 10 issuance of an 11th-hour order postponing the scheduled trial to allow Ross to file an interlocutory appeal of the judges partial grant of summary judgment.
This allows them to better assert their rights and protect their interests if they end up in litigation. The judge can rule in favor of one party or the other at this point because they dont need the help of the jury to apply the law. (A A judge will decide this type of case on their own. What Can You Ask a Court To Do?
Generative AI’s (“genAI”) ability to “deepfake” audiovisual evidence presents dual concerns: (1) parties could present deepfaked evidence as real, or (2) parties could challenge real evidence as deepfaked, requiring resources for evidence validation on top of the already lengthy and expensive litigation process. In Huang v.
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectual property rights.
Trellis data is maximized in a revolutionary and unique way to provide users an exclusive look into a law firm litigating in state trial courts. Judges Tab : List of Judges Where the Firm Had Cases In Front Of, the Court Name, and the Count of Cases. Features Include. This data is not available anywhere else !
AI in Litigation and Case Management: Transforming the Legal Landscape Technology is in every aspect of our lives; the legal field is no exception. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into litigation and case management is revolutionizing how legal professionals operate. However, AI significantly streamlines this process.
Another example of procedural justice is alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes, such as mediation, arbitration, and neutral evaluation, which allow litigants to use the assistance of a neutral third party to help resolve a legal dispute in a more collaborative space. What are the 4 pillars of procedural justice?
Why Litigation Experience Matters in a Patent Attorney One of the most overlooked but highly valuable assets in a patent attorney is litigation experience specifically, experience arguing patent cases in federal court.
” [The $2,500 amount was suggested by the presiding judge at a settlement conference, which the defendant turned into an offer of judgment.] However we get there, the overall litigation enterprise here makes no economic sense. On the other hand, the plaintiff never sent a C&D.
Each new case will include all case metadata like judge, parties, counsel, practice area, and even direct links to the full docket and complaint. Trellis Daily Filings Reports provide direct access to newly filed state and federal litigation curated just for you.
Toyota brought a SAD Scheme case against 103 defendants before Judge Daniel in the Northern District of Illinois. As I recently mentioned , Judge Daniel is calling out overreaching joinder allegations in SAD Scheme cases. Judge Daniel responds unambiguously: “None of these arguments are persuasive.” Do better).
This engaging, practical session explores how to transform your legal writing using the Betty Flowers framework, a four-stage writing process that every attorney should know: Madman, Architect, Carpenter, and Judge. Jansson is a litigation associate in the Los Angeles office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. ET/10:00 a.m.
Further insights could be gleaned based on the type of case, jurisdiction, judge, or even opposing counsel. Predictive analytics can also guide whether to settle or proceed to court on a file based on analysis of past settlements, litigation costs, and opposing counsels behavior. How does predictive analytics work in litigation?
When litigation seems likely, the first critical step is preserving data. A legal hold, or litigation hold, requires organizations to preserve relevant data during or ahead of legal proceedings. UBS Warburg set strong expectations around timely, thorough preservation when litigation is foreseeable. Legal holds aren’t optional.
After all, one cannot simply turn over their phone to the Court and have a Judge read all the communications between parties. In addition to family law litigation, she also negotiates prenuptial, post-nuptial and cohabitation agreements on behalf of clients. In fact, the admissibility of text messages at trial may vary by jurisdiction.
The Majority Opinion For the most part, the majority opinion endorses the lower court decision, repeatedly saying (in essence) that the lower court judge got it right (or least didn’t make any obvious errors). The lower court judge should feel good about his work.
Moreover, the report’s findings may influence future litigation and policy-making, potentially reshaping the boundaries of fair use in the context of AI.It It highlights the necessity of conducting thorough due diligence on training data sources and encourages the pursuit of licensing agreements to mitigate infringement risks.
Forensic accounting plays a critical role in business litigation. Even the most skilled forensic accountant won’t get far without effective marketing—especially when targeting a niche audience like business litigators or divorce attorneys. Business litigators or divorce lawyers aren’t just looking for a “number cruncher.”
The problem is that you may not find out about those critical defects until you try to enforce the trademark registration against an infringer and end up with a judge invalidating your entire trademark registration. Customs enforcement, or litigation if needed. 5 Reasons to Trademark Your Brand 1. You may need a U.S.
On January 27, 2025, a federal judge in the Northern District of California ordered OpenAI to produce a dataset to plaintiffs counsel that was used by the company to train its generative AI model, GPT-4. Just weeks into 2025, we got our first answer, with a court ordering OpenAI to produce a complete training dataset to plaintiffs.
Developers of artificial intelligence (“AI”) systems notched a victory last week when a federal judge dismissed claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) premised on the use of copyrighted works in AI training data, holding that the plaintiffs had failed to show any concrete harm and therefore lacked standing to bring their claims.
Gone are the days when judges were unaware that AI is simply a tool that one may apply to many generic problems. Implications for Patent Filings This decision underscores the importance of claim drafting in patents covering new applications of artificial intelligence.
Likening the process of crafting headnotes to that of a sculptor chiseling through marble, Judge Bibas wrote that a sculptor creates a sculpture by choosing what to cut away and what to leave in place. some creative spark. Feist Publications, Inc. 340 (1991). To subscribe to the Data Blog, please click here.
Are you a busy litigator constantly on the move? For clients concerned about issues of prejudice, unfairness, inconvenience, improper venue, or for cases requiring judges with special knowledge, a motion to transfer venue can be used to ensure a fair and comfortable legal process. Let us show you around book a demo today !
Judge William Alsup ruled that Anthropic, the AI company behind the Claude chatbot, did not break the law by training its models on copyrighted books—at least not when it comes to how the books were used. What the Court Said In his opinion issued yesterday, Judge Alsup ruled training AI models on books qualifies as “fair use” under U.S.
Examples of AI generated evidence could include: In a securities litigation, an AI system analyzes stock trading patterns over the last ten years to demonstrate the relative magnitude of the stock drop as a percentage of the Dow Jones Industrial Average, or to assess how likely it is that the drop in price was caused by a particular event.
In countries such as the United States, Canada, and Australia, can refer to the common law as case law and judge-made law which first originated in England and have been practiced. When making decisions, judges look at how other judges have decided cases that were similar in the past. New decision based on the previous one.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 26, which we posted on Jan. Legion AI Associate We are building AI agents that draft discovery and motions for litigation lawyers, allowing lawyers to customize each document in their own voice and generate work product on their own template.
A federal judge stepping in to put the brakes on OpenAI and its new venture with famed Apple designer Jony Ive. District Judge Trina Thompson issued a temporary restraining order barring the defendants from using the name “IO” to market their new AI device—at least for the time being. Brett Trout What do you get when you mix a $6.5
First, the term is not standard for this litigation genre. 3) If you want to avoid the first two points, use a two-click process (a “clickwrap”). * * * Judge Nelson, author of the panel opinion, wrote a concurrence to his own opinion. .” The Berman opinion also used this term, but only once.
For instance, machine learning can predict litigation risks based on similar cases, identify trends that might impact a client, or flag unusual clauses in contracts that might need extra attention. Its particularly useful for litigation teams looking to analyze case trends, predict outcomes, and gain insights into opposing counsel or judges.
In other circumstances where a SAD Scheme plaintiff gets caught making a serious litigation error, the judge typically will resolve the motion on its desk and move on. If I were a judge, and I realized that Modlily’s bad case prep had led me to grant extraordinary relief to Modlily, I would be PISSED.
A trial is the dramatic apex of the litigation process. A trial preparation checklist can help you and your litigation team stay on track. A trial preparation checklist can help you and your litigation team stay on track. After closing arguments, the judge or jury deliberates and delivers a verdict.
It was in 1917 that a judge ruled there were protections for the contents of sealed mail. The history of privacy law The roots of privacy law in the U.S. go back further than one might think. Supreme Court rulings have found that the First, Third, Fourth, and Fifth amendments of the Constitution contain a right to privacy.
Any litigator will eventually have to contend with motions to compel discovery (also known as motions for discovery). Here, we explore in more detail the role of these motions in modern litigation. A motion for discovery is a legal motion filed to enforce discovery rights, whether in civil or criminal litigation.
Trellis and Premonition analyze vast amounts of similar cases to predict settlement ranges and litigation outcomes specific to your jurisdiction, judge, and case details. This cuts your research time dramatically while improving your arguments. Gain insights into case valuation and outcomes. Keep clients updated effortlessly.
Attendees had the chance to collaborate directly with Clio team members in our product labs and explore sessions covering topics like artificial intelligence, billing innovations, cybersecurity advancements, and morealong with an in-depth look at the Legal Trends Report with Clios Lawyer-in-Residence, Joshua Lenon.
Build Your Case Story: Start Early “Don’t wait until you’re getting ready for trial to start figuring out what story you want to tell,” advised Anand Mathew, VP of Litigation Support Services at Nextpoint Law Group. This key message resonated throughout the webinar. Effective case presentation begins long before trial.
Given that they are litigating 512(f), your wish was partially granted. This opinion suggests this judge would have zero interest in enjoining rightsowners from this practice. Universal * Two 512(f) Rulings Where The Litigants Dispute Copyright Ownership * It Takes a Default Judgment to Win a 17 USC 512(f) CaseAutomattic v.
The discovery process is a critical element of litigation, and objections to discovery requests are every bit as essential. Any legal professional working in litigation needs to know how to make these objections, and how to respond when the opposing side makes them. This is why a cheat sheet for discovery objections can be valuable.
Back in the old days, judges were baffled by keyword advertising. ” Wow, talk about appellate judge making up facts. The Concurrence In her concurrence, Judge Desai would have gone further to say that competitive keyword advertising isn’t a trademark use in commerce. ” More manufactured empiricism.
Two prior blog posts on Bell’s litigation efforts: Fair Use Protects High Schools Use of Inspirational MemeBell v. This extraordinary assertion, with which Shakespeare, Tolstoy and Faulkner might take issue, [FN] frankly causes this court to wonder whether it is dealing with a litigant whose feet are firmly planted on the ground.
As the judge says resignedly, “Taking these provisions directly from a law enacted in the United Kingdom, the California Legislature left it to the courts to pass the CAADCA through the filter of our First Amendment.” ” * * * Judge Beth Labson Freeman did an exceptionally good job with this opinion.
If the judge thinks its reasonable, the judge can allow it. But here, the judge invited the parties to engage in extensive letter-briefing on the motion to amend the claims. The judge decided that this was an actionable deprivation of use of its servers, and allowed the TTC claims to proceed. Here, X Corp.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content