This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
19, 2024 /PRNewswire/ — Today, Trellis launched Trellis AI, a powerful new legal productivity platform designed for the complex needs of trial courtlitigation. LOS ANGELES, Nov.
Today, Trellis launched Trellis AI, a powerful new legal productivity platform designed for the complex needs of trial courtlitigation. By automating litigation tasks like motion drafting and case evaluations, Trellis AI transforms the way litigators approach case work with greater accuracy, efficiency, and strategic insight.
A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. This allows them to better assert their rights and protect their interests if they end up in litigation. What Can You Ask a Court To Do?
The defendant conceded summary judgment on liability, and the court held a trial on damages. This post covers the court’s ruling following the damages trial. Setting the Damages Range The court rejects KMC’s innocent infringement defense. Not willful. Defendant’s financial benefit. ” Deterrence.
With our court data solution, financial experts can access critical litigation insights, making it an invaluable resource for informed decision-making in the financial sector. Finance teams find Trellis to be particularly effective in conducting comprehensive due diligence on both individuals and businesses.
The key is crafting you patent not only for breadth, but with an eye toward litigation. The goal is for competitors to look at your patent and decide they would rather stay out of your market or pay you a licensing fee than try to fight your patent in court. This involves lawsuits, settlements, and sometimes courtroom battles.
Amazon , where Xiaohua Huang, a pro se litigant, attempted to enforce his patents against Amazon. The court ultimately dismissed his case, citing his persistent failures to address these issues. The court ultimately dismissed his case, citing his persistent failures to address these issues.
From smartphones and social media to cloud platforms and AI devices, digital evidence is increasingly central to family law litigation. Whether you’re a seasoned litigator or new to handling digital evidence, this session will provide the essential knowledge needed to stay effective and compliant in today’s tech-driven legal environment.
However, unlike phone calls, text messages leave a written record that can later be reviewed, and, in some cases, used as evidence in court. After all, one cannot simply turn over their phone to the Court and have a Judge read all the communications between parties. The most important advice then is to think before you text.
Law Firm Intelligence by Trellis aggregates state trial court data across the Trellis platform enabling users to: look up a particular metric related to a specific law firm (such as, how many cases a law firm had or has against another law firm), and see the actual dockets and documents supporting the metric. Features Include.
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectual property rights. Showing Substantial Similarity of Generative AI Outputs.
Legal Risks of Non-Compliance Website accessibility lawsuits have surged in recent years, with businesses across all industries facing litigation. Notable lawsuits have highlighted the importance of proactive compliance, and courts have increasingly sided with plaintiffs seeking equal access to digital services.
Even for smaller cases, where the damages are less than $1 million, the patent litigation costs average $700,000. While a contingent fee arrangement does not cover third-party costs such as expert witness fees, they cover attorneys fees which typically make up the vast majority of litigation costs. What Is a Contingent Fee Structure?
While AI promises efficiency and cost savings, a recent case in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of including unverified AI-generated content in court filings. The court discovered that eight of those cases did not exist. Walmart Inc. &
Trellis AI leverages the largest repository of state trial court data to help litigators evaluate cases, automate brief drafting, suggest winning strategies, and more.
Alissa’s trial experience led to her recognition by the New Jersey Supreme Court as a Certified Criminal Trial Attorney in 2024. Supreme Court decisions, this webinar offers a rare opportunity to track constitutional shifts that affect domestic violence litigation. Angelica M. More Questions? With discussion anchored by key U.S.
Generative AI’s (“genAI”) ability to “deepfake” audiovisual evidence presents dual concerns: (1) parties could present deepfaked evidence as real, or (2) parties could challenge real evidence as deepfaked, requiring resources for evidence validation on top of the already lengthy and expensive litigation process. Finally, during the US v.
Legal-Specific Calendar Tools: Never Miss a Deadline Again In the legal world where missed deadlines have consequences, efficient calendar management is vital and needs to go beyond basic scheduling to comply with court rules. Calendar tools for lawyers have multi-user access and automate court date calculations.
As seen in the latest CIO Applications for the Legal Vertical publication: “Legal research has traditionally focused on appellate courts, leaving trial courts—where much litigation unfolds—fragmented and hard to access.
Patent Agents : Individuals who are licensed to practice before the USPTO and can assist with filing and prosecution of patents but cannot provide legal advice or representation in court. Produce a patent that will stand up in court. Draft an application that will support those claims and stand up in court.
In a ruling with potential implications for other pending generative artificial intelligence (AI) copyright cases, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH & West Publishing Corp. ROSS Intelligence Inc. some creative spark.
Veritext Legal Solutions, the leader in technology-enabled court reporting services and litigation support solutions, today announces the expansion of its service offerings to include alternative dispute resolution.
Skechers (2016) Nike took Skechers to court for allegedly infringing eight Nike patents, including patents covering the Flyknit technology. The sportswear giant has sued multiple competitors over its Flyknit technology, including: Adidas (2021) Nike accused AdidasPrimeknitshoes of infringing on Flyknit patents. The case was settled in 2022.
Why Litigation Experience Matters in a Patent Attorney One of the most overlooked but highly valuable assets in a patent attorney is litigation experience specifically, experience arguing patent cases in federal court. Final Thoughts If youre serious about protecting your innovation, dont settle for a cookie-cutter patent.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the main court for resolving patent issues) issued a significant decision in Recentive Analytics, Inc. The Court’s Analysis Applying the two-step framework from Alice Corp. Brett Trout On April 18, 2025, the U.S. Fox Corp. (No.
Increasingly, however, these technologies present litigation risks under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA). In this blog post, we provide an overview of the technologies that plaintiffs most commonly target for CIPA lawsuits and measures that companies can take to mitigate their CIPA litigation risk.
In the intricate realm of patent litigation, the choice of legal representation can significantly influence the outcome of a case. While you want your patent lawyer to zealously represent your interests in court, having a lawyer who is too aggressive can backfire spectacularly. Brett Trout In a word, yes.
An example of procedural justice in the courtroom would be as simple as providing an interpreter to someone appearing at traffic court if English was not their first language. This way, regardless of the outcome of their traffic case, the persons experience in court will be more respectful and fair.
A trial is the dramatic apex of the litigation process. A trial preparation checklist can help you and your litigation team stay on track. A trial preparation checklist can help you and your litigation team stay on track. Another aspect of trial preparation is dealing with opposing counsel and the court prior to trial.
A few initial remarks] The Supreme Court’s ruling will foster more online censorship. The Supreme Court endorses a “Fortress USA” approach, i.e., that legislatures can impose special rules that create a bordered Internet customized for the US and more heavily censored than the Internet in other countries.
” (Plus, the court notes that while he’s in prison, his job prospects are limited). Despite the dismissal, I view this case as a warning sign of how anti-doxxing statutes will contribute to lots of meritless and problematic litigation. ” It does not go well for him. Case Citation : Nikko D’Ambrosio v.
When litigation seems likely, the first critical step is preserving data. They are court-recognized obligations that prevent data loss and help organizations maintain credibility in legal proceedings. A legal hold, or litigation hold, requires organizations to preserve relevant data during or ahead of legal proceedings.
Advantages include tax benefits and a court system with special expertise in corporate issues. In states where theyre more often allowed, courts will look at whether theyre reasonable. Courts dont want a non-compete agreement to essentially prevent an employee from earning a living entirely.
When rules vary across jurisdictions, companies either over-comply (wasting resources) or under-comply (exposing themselves to enforcement, litigation, or reputational fallout). Divergences between the two frameworks increase compliance costs and create regulatory uncertainty.
You may be able to file an extension when things go awry in court, but Santa doesn’t get the same leniency and neither do his trusty elves. Smells Like the Best Lawyer Ever Candle Both candles and lawyers have been known to melt under a little heat though lawyers are better at keeping their cool in court!
With a background in psychology and political science from Vanderbilt University and an MPPM from Birmingham-Southern College, Jake has shaped national and international litigation strategies, contributing to successful settlements, including large-scale outcomes.
based Fastcase and the litigation database Docket Alarm. 0) Federal Court Rules Anthropic’s Use of Copyrighted Material to Train its Model is Allowed Under Fair Use Provisions of U.S. Why vLex Matters Since 2000, vLex has evolved into a global leader in legal intelligence, especially after acquiring U.S.-based
What the courts want now is a technological blueprint : a narrative that spells out the detailed how —not just the what —behind your invention. But what did the court see? Brett Trout If your AI patent application stops at “we used machine learning to solve X,” you’re already losing. Here’s how to build it. The reason?
” The plaintiffs brought a pre-enforcement challenge to the law, but the court denies a preliminary injunction. The court explains: Deepfakes are image, audio, or video files that mimic real or nonexistent people saying and doing things that never happened. The court does realize the overlap here, right? ” Hmm.
Three proposed billsthePREVAIL Act, RESTORE Act, and PERA (Patent Eligibility Restoration Act)aim to fix longstanding issues in patent law, making iteasier for inventors to obtain patents, defend them in court, and monetize their innovations. This law would give inventors a real weapon against infringers? to fall behind other countries.
Brett Trout A federal court in San Francisco just handed down a ruling that is shaking up authors and AI users alike. What the Court Said In his opinion issued yesterday, Judge Alsup ruled training AI models on books qualifies as “fair use” under U.S. According to the court, the AI was not copying the books word-for-word.
Jansson is a litigation associate in the Los Angeles office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. Gutierrez of the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Erica earned her law degree summa cum laude from Southwestern Law School, where she has also worked as an adjunct professor, teaching appellate litigation.
By Brian Lee A New York appellate court on Wednesday ordered a negligent supervision claim against an upstate school district to trial, four years after a student with a significant disciplinary history slammed another’s head into a pillar, resulting in injuries.
Public opinion of the nations judicial system and courts fell to a record-low in 2024, according to the latest Gallup poll. Litigation. Another component of the blueprint involves reform through litigation challenging restrictions on who is authorized to provide legal services and how they may do so.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content