This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. This allows them to better assert their rights and protect their interests if they end up in litigation. What Can You Ask a Court To Do?
Pre/Dicta , a litigation analytics platform that predicts how federal court judges will rule, is expanding to cover new motion types and also to predict litigation timelines. It will also now predict timelines for key litigation events. Pre/Dicta founder Dan Rabinowitz calls it finding their doppelgangers.
The defendant conceded summary judgment on liability, and the court held a trial on damages. This post covers the court’s ruling following the damages trial. Setting the Damages Range The court rejects KMC’s innocent infringement defense. Not willful. Defendant’s financial benefit. ” Deterrence.
” (Plus, the court notes that while he’s in prison, his job prospects are limited). ” Doxing The relevant statute applies when a defendant intentionally published the plaintiff’s personally identifiable information without the consent of the person whose information is published.”
With our court data solution, financial experts can access critical litigation insights, making it an invaluable resource for informed decision-making in the financial sector. Finance teams find Trellis to be particularly effective in conducting comprehensive due diligence on both individuals and businesses.
Increasingly, however, these technologies present litigation risks under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA). In this blog post, we provide an overview of the technologies that plaintiffs most commonly target for CIPA lawsuits and measures that companies can take to mitigate their CIPA litigation risk. Session Replays.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the main court for resolving patent issues) issued a significant decision in Recentive Analytics, Inc. The Court’s Analysis Applying the two-step framework from Alice Corp. Brett Trout On April 18, 2025, the U.S. Fox Corp. (No.
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectual property rights. Showing Substantial Similarity of Generative AI Outputs.
Ai.law , a legal technology startup that uses artificial intelligence to generate litigation documents, has added a new module that will draft the complaint to initiate a lawsuit. The product, which is in beta, generates a Microsoft Word document formatted for the federal court system.
Trellis AI leverages the largest repository of state trial court data to help litigators evaluate cases, automate brief drafting, suggest winning strategies, and more. Key Witnesses — Identify the people involved in the case and their roles to inform decisions about document requests, interrogatories, and depositions.
It was a fairly intimate, invitation-only gathering of roughly 65 people, held under the Chatham House Rule, meaning that participants were free to use the information we received, but we agreed not to disclose the identity or affiliation of the speakers or participants. If anything, the gap seems only to be widening.
A trial is the dramatic apex of the litigation process. A trial preparation checklist can help you and your litigation team stay on track. A trial preparation checklist can help you and your litigation team stay on track. During a lead-up to trial and the trial itself, it can be difficult to access key information on the go.
While AI promises efficiency and cost savings, a recent case in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of including unverified AI-generated content in court filings. The court discovered that eight of those cases did not exist. Walmart Inc. &
Litigation, ADR, ODR—The Next Normal? Nicole Nehama Auerbach—litigator, co-founder of pioneering law firms Valorem Law and ElevateNext. Sohail Mohammed—electrical engineer, New Jersey Superior Court Judge, court innovator and teacher. On march 12, the New Jersey Chief Justice announced the courts going all virtual.
Image credit: Al Holguin Litigation-Tech has been around for many years, helping attorneys navigate their way onto the technology highway in the courtroom. Abraham Lincoln was a master of using language to persuade and inform. And of course, Abraham Lincoln's go-to service provider would have been Litigation-Tech !
The pandemic caused civil courts in the United States to adopt technology at an unprecedented pace and scale, improving participation in court proceedings and helping users resolve disputes more efficiently. Pew researchers examined pandemic-related emergency orders issued by the supreme courts of all 50 states and Washington, D.C.
In addition, 7150 (b) and 7153 require companies to conduct internal risk assessments (particularly when profiling is involved) and share relevant information with third parties in plain language. Explicitly extending opt-in consent to the processing of sensitive information would be a step in the right direction.
Federal statutes do not provide clear answers to these questions, so courts will need to confront them. Already, lawsuits involving AI-generated works have been filed in federal courts from coast to coast. This free database provides public records of lawsuits in federal trial and appellate courts. A pending lawsuit in the U.S.
The court dismisses the lawsuit on several grounds, including res judicata. With respect to the social media services’ status as publishers, the court says: the plaintiff’s RICO claims depend on Twitter and Facebook’s acting as publishers. The post Laura Loomer Loses Litigation (Again)–Loomer v. The complaint.
The summaries listed below are based on information provided by the startups in their applications. In some cases as noted, startups have not provided information or have asked that information be kept confidential. VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery.
Called Litigation Footprint, it provides a visual overview of the federal and state courts across the country in which a party has litigated, derived from the litigation histories of parties in over 27 million cases filed in 94 federal district courts and over 1,300 state courts in 34 states and the District of Columbia.
This represents a goldmine of information about the litigation process. Read Our Article… Continue reading → The post ⚡Primer on Using State Court Trial Data for Business and Competitive Intelligence first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog. Approximately 41,000 civil lawsuits are filed daily in the U.S.,
In a ruling with potential implications for other pending generative artificial intelligence (AI) copyright cases, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH & West Publishing Corp. ROSS Intelligence Inc. some creative spark.
After all, this is also the standard that the court will typically use in assessing the outcome of their matter. Whenever possible, helping clients reach a compromise tailored to the familys unique circumstances is preferable to a schedule imposed by the court.
The plaintiffs allege that Confirm ID violates the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (BIPA). The court says that the plaintiffs’ allegations treat AFF as the data controller and Confirm ID as the data processor, and that’s sufficient to acknowledge the affiliate relationship. Martell v. Kuklinski v.
If this happens, a consumer might be able to pursue a claim in court. The Consumer Protection Law Center offers information about these topics and others related to consumer rights. When the damages are relatively limited, a consumer might consider pursuing action in small claims court.
In fairness, the Missouri case involved a pro se litigant, not a lawyer, but that pro se litigant claimed to have gotten the citations from a lawyer he hired through the internet. Karlen , the unwitting litigant filed an appellate brief in which 22 of 24 cases were fictitious. The court was not sympathetic.
In the intricate realm of patent litigation, the choice of legal representation can significantly influence the outcome of a case. While you want your patent lawyer to zealously represent your interests in court, having a lawyer who is too aggressive can backfire spectacularly. Brett Trout In a word, yes.
This tool allows law firms to analyze aggregated and normalized state trial court data to gain competitive intelligence across cases, practice areas, and performance. Collecting this unstructured data from county courts is very challenging, but provides valuable business insights. But steady growth has now built their credibility.
Managing an increasing volume of cases and court deadlines– sometimes in multiple jurisdictions – is one of the biggest time management challenges for law firms. . The court ordered additional briefings, but the lawyer then missed multiple deadlines, claiming earlier orders were lost among numerous notifications on his mobile phone.
A basic board might include columns for Intake, Information Gathering, Drafting, Review, and Completed. For example, a document may cycle through drafting and review, or even information gathering, drafting, and review several times before being completed. Flexibility allows you to make a system that works well for your practice.
“So often when attorneys are writing court documents or preparing for oral arguments and they want to know what their judge thinks about different issues in their case, they have very little information to go off of. This is the kind of information that our tool can provide.” federal courts. federal courts.
As a former litigator, Schafer experienced firsthand the frustrating scramble to finalize briefs and prepare filings. Looking ahead, Schafer expects to expand ClearBrief’s features to assist paralegals along with corporate attorneys beyond litigation. Excuse was Sorry, didn’t check it. So Jackie, welcome to The Geek in Review.
By Neil Amato The deadline for most reporting companies to file beneficial ownership information (BOI) reports was extended to Jan. 13, 2025, by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), hours after a Monday court ruling reinstated the reporting requirement. 1, 2025, BOI reporting deadline pending a further order of the court.
I’m sure you’re surprised to learn that when the judge actually reviewed the matter on a fully informed basis, it didn’t see trademark infringement. The court should have embraced its first instinct that the merchant didn’t use “emoji” as a mark. ” Trademark law does not restrict that usage.
In a world where most information is easy to come by, sometimes important and crucial information, such as laws and the legal resources surrounding them, are restricted from those who need it most. Keep watch as Tim guides you through the best sources for free legal research! The presentation will begin promptly at 2:00 p.m.
Today brings news that Gavelytics , a seven-year-old litigation analytics company, is closing its doors effective tomorrow. We invented the category of state court analytics. We built things never before built and answered litigation-related questions never before answerable. The reason, he said, is “a long story.” .
Moritz College of Law The copyright – contract tension Stewart Brand famously said that information wants to be free. We know, however, that many laws limit free access and use of information goods, most prominently copyright law (and IP law generally). Guy Rub , The Ohio State University Michael E.
The court says this implementation isn’t a sign-in-wrap because the CMG terms lacked a call-to-action: “the login through Facebook screen never informed Plaintiff that acceptance of a separate agreement was required before she could access the service, which is the defining feature of a sign-in wrap agreement.”
As a legal professional, you know how challenging it can be to present a case in court and make sure that the judge and jury fully understand your argument.
As a legal professional, you know how challenging it can be to present a case in court and make sure that the judge and jury fully understand your argument.
By Rick Clark , VP of Strategic Partnerships and Marketing at CloudNine, and Melissa Weberman , Counsel and Head of eData at Arnold & Porter In todays evolving corporate data landscape, custodian interviewsearly interviews of key employees who hold relevant electronically stored information (ESI) remain a cornerstone for defensible discovery.
Three proposed billsthePREVAIL Act, RESTORE Act, and PERA (Patent Eligibility Restoration Act)aim to fix longstanding issues in patent law, making iteasier for inventors to obtain patents, defend them in court, and monetize their innovations. This law would give inventors a real weapon against infringers? to fall behind other countries.
Legal-Specific Calendar Tools: Never Miss a Deadline Again In the legal world where missed deadlines have consequences, efficient calendar management is vital and needs to go beyond basic scheduling to comply with court rules. Calendar tools for lawyers have multi-user access and automate court date calculations. Download free guide 7.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content