This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. What Can You Ask a Court To Do? What you want the court to do is usually called a remedy. What you want the court to do is usually called a remedy.
Chloe Miracle-Rutledge | Georgetown University Law Center, U The US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments Wednesday in a landmark case involving a Tennessee law that prohibits gender-affirming healthcare for minors. United States v.
In a judicial foreclosure , the lender seeks a judgment from a court to foreclose on the home. On the other hand, a non-judicial foreclosure allows a lender to foreclose on the property outside court. A homeowner who has a defense would need to file a new lawsuit in court. This may take several months or more.
This means your law firms website needs to be accessible to people with vision, hearing, mobility, and cognitive impairments. Provide captions for videos and transcripts for audio content to support users who are deaf or hard of hearing. Alternative Text & Multimedia Accessibility Add descriptive alt text for all images.
Trellis AI leverages the largest repository of state trial court data to help litigators evaluate cases, automate brief drafting, suggest winning strategies, and more. Analyze Argument — Pinpoint the key arguments and evidence within opposing counsel's brief to help you draft a reply and prepare for a hearing.
AI in the Courtroom: Insights from Judge Braswell | Masters Conference: Denver June 24, 2025 | Article by Sheila Sadaghiani At the Masters Conference in Denver, Co on June 24 th , Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell laid out a powerful framework for how courts are grappling with AI today. And Judge Braswell did not let us down.
Want to hear from more inspiring speakers? For instance, you’ll see language in Supreme Court opinions suggesting that no one can penetrate the mind. Want to hear from more insightful ClioCon keynote speakers like Nita Farahany? Nita explains that current legal frameworks meant to protect human rights are outdated.
The court reproached Tesla’s refusal to cooperate and raised a slippery-slope concern that every famous person could “hide behind the potential for their recorded statements being a deepfake to avoid taking ownership of what they did actually say and do.” The Court responded , “That’s probably enough to get it in.”
Real-World Application: Hear about practical tools, examples, and expert strategies for using metadata, forensic review, and Requests for Admission to strengthen your case. Common Pitfalls & Sanctions: Recognize legal risks in improperly obtaining or mishandling digital data, and how to protect your client and yourself.
The New York court system automated processes to help marginalized individuals file complaints and navigate the system more easily,” she shared. If an AI system flags someone as a “red flag,” it’s based on data from past convictions, suggesting they might not return to court or could re-offend.
An example of procedural justice in the courtroom would be as simple as providing an interpreter to someone appearing at traffic court if English was not their first language. This way, regardless of the outcome of their traffic case, the persons experience in court will be more respectful and fair.
Brett Trout On July 23, 2025, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned Yuga Labs’ big trademark win over artists Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen. The court reversed the nearly $9 million summary judgment from the Central District of California and sent the case back for trial. Key Takeaways NFTs are still goods under the Lanham Act.
To have case information at your fingertips, whether you are heading into court or running in and out of the office, try Clio Manage and see how this cloud-based practice management tool can simplify your trial work. Another aspect of trial preparation is dealing with opposing counsel and the court prior to trial.
Brett Trout When people hear the word patent, they often assume its a uniform stamp of protectionsomething rigid, standardized, and identical no matter who files it. They dont just aim to get you a patentthey aim to get you a patent that courts will uphold and competitors will either respect, or pay the price.
Public opinion of the nations judicial system and courts fell to a record-low in 2024, according to the latest Gallup poll. For example, historically the Supreme Court employed antitrust doctrine to ease competitive barriers and reduce costs for things like real estate title searches and bar exam review courses.
A motion for a change of venue is a legal request where a case is transferred from one court jurisdiction to another to ensure a fair trial and avoid bias or undue influence. Improper venue : If your case was initially filed in a jurisdiction lacking proper legal authority or was filed to the wrong court, it could be transferred.
What Type of Work You Perform Its common to hear the term grunt work to describe first-year associate duties. A missed court deadline can impact the rights of the client and open the lawyer up to a malpractice claim. Extra tip: double check external deadlines you hear second hand from someone else.
Generative AI has transformed how people around the world work; how they create; and what they see, hear, and watch online. There are also likely to be fundamental disagreements among judges as to the strength of core defenses like fair use, which in the past have split appellate courts and even the Supreme Court.
The court summarizes the case: Rodney Woodland, a freelance artist and model, posts semi-naked photographs of himself in different poses on Instagram. The court displayed all of the photos side-by-side, so of course we’re going to look at them. I guess that makes me old-school. So I think this is a SFW post.
Example: Having AI draft a legal brief for an important court filing. But theAI cant tell who is actuallyyelling(which is improper conduct that only occursinfrequently) and who is appropriately speaking loudly because a customer is hearing-impaired or is in a noisy location (which happens frequently).
Book a demo of Clio Manage’s Court Rules feature and automate court deadline reminders with ease! It involves entering key dates, like hearings, filing deadlines, and other events, into a centralized system to ensure that they are not missed. Ready to streamline your legal docketing process? What is legal docketing?
By filing such a motion, youre asking the court to intervene in the discovery process on your behalf. Motions for discovery are important for getting the court to enforce discovery rules. E-discovery often requires more extensive court supervision and oversight. What is a motion for discovery? What is a motion to compel?
One feature in common law of the United States is stare decisis, which holds that the interpretation of the statute by a court is subject to any previous ruling on any case involving that same statute by any other court. Flexibility Since society shapes the common law, it is more flexible.
There was a joke when I worked for the courts that they said the courts have yesterday's technology tomorrow. Every time I hear Joe and John speak”, Damien says, “it's clear that they talk the talk and walk the walk, where others just kind of talk the talk.
Invisible Narratives sought an ex parte TRO to prevent that from happening, which the court grants. The court relies on 512(f) as the basis of the TRO: “Invisible Narratives has presented evidence that Next Level was neither the original creator of Skibidi Toilet nor the lawful copyright owner of Skibidi Toilet characters.
If youd like to hear from cutting-edge speakers on the movement toward trauma-informed justice and other relevant topics in the legal industry, be sure to register for ClioCon 2025. Many trauma-informed practices have already been implemented in court systems that deal with sensitive populations, such as juveniles or military veterans.
” Toyota cited the 2020 Bose decision, which said that online marketplace alleged counterfeiters could be analogized to BitTorrent infringers, where courts have held that joinder against BitTorrent participants can be supported when they are all part of the same swarm. The rule establishes the standard.
This can include preparing or handling legal papers and even assisting an attorney in court. Employing legal assisting software, a legal assistant could be trained to sort and input legal and court documents. A legal assistant supports legal professionals such as lawyers and offers a variety of clerical duties.
The rival bought competitive keyword ads (the court uses the term “conquesting,” which I objected to here ) but didn’t include the third-party trademark in the ad copy. The trademark owner sued the advertiser for trademark infringement and lost in the district court. Prior blog post on the district court ruling.
Courts have sided with companies in similar situations before, like Seycos vs. Seiko and XCEED vs. X-Seed. Judge Thompson agreed that the risk of confusion was real enough to justify a temporary restraining order, which will stay in place until a full hearing in October. IYO claims “IO” sounds too much like its own brand.
The court says it found “his testimony and opinion not credible,” something no expert witness ever wants to see published in a court opinion. The court is NOT IMPRESSED by Ranson’s use of generative AI here. The court reran Ranson’s queries at Copilot and got slightly different numbers each time.
As you’ll hear him say, he makes no bones about calling it a game changer. Steno , reliable court reporting with a revolutionary approach If you enjoy listening to LawNext, please leave us a review wherever you listen to podcasts. Littler, local everywhere.
Supreme Court cases and political movements can change this area of legal practice in the coming year. Supreme Court. Reviving the nondelegation doctrine: This would bring back a legal theory not used by the court in 90 years. The court might not decide this issue directly, but might limit what the EPA can do.
District Judge James Boasberg found “the Governments actions on that day demonstrate a willful disregard for its Order, sufficient for the Court to conclude that probable cause exists to find the Government in criminal contempt. None of their responses has been satisfactory, the judge wrote.
has been given unprecedented access to film inside the courthouses of the Los Angeles County court system the largest court system in the world and one where litigants unable to get a lawyer present enormous challenges to the civil justice system. The documentary, called Justice: Just A Promise?,
Its important to talk the client through certain steps, like preparation for arbitration or court appearances. A client might hear that the attorney will secure a certain result when in fact they were simply stating possible goals for an outcome. That way they understand their attorney is on their side.
The district court dismissed the case. The Ninth Circuit affirms every point of the district court’s decision. ” BTW, I disagree with the court’s summation of the Internet Brands case; I feel the Ninth Circuit got that one wrong because that case was always about third-party content. .”
9) Supreme Court Tamps Down on Jawboning and Government Social Media Lawsuits. The Supreme Court is taking a steady stream of Internet Law cases, a trend that will continue for some time. Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the TikTok ban, and Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Free Speech Coalition v.
The court says that Viral DRM’s exclusive “management” rights is not the same as ownership or an exclusive license to the copyright. The court says that Viral DRM doesn’t have standing to enforce the copyright. All of this discussion had a Righthaven vibe to it, and it ends up in the same place.
9] Hearing the case on appeal, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of anti-monopolistic requirements, ordering the divestment of these major studios from their cinemas to ensure more widespread competition. [10] Paramount Pictures, Inc. 8] Functionally, this alleged conspiracy amounted to vertical integration across the film industry. [9]
When an important hearing or filing due date changes, staff must adjust multiple related tasks by hand. On top of this, Rocket Matters Event Logic makes sure that tasks and calendar events are properly linked , preventing scheduling conflicts and keeping case deadlines, meetings, and court dates aligned.
Learn More from the Legal Tech Experts Watch the full webinar, Live from Legalweek, to hear from more legal tech pros in addition to Zach and Brett. Plus, stay tuned […] The post How State Courts are Embracing AI: Insights from Zach Warren at Legalweek appeared first on Nextpoint.
Administrative and regulatory law should be an active area of legal practice in 2025, as the courts and the federal executive make changes to agency regulatory authority. Supreme Court has reduced federal agency authority in recent judgments. Basics of administrative law In the United States, legislative bodies pass laws.
The court reaches none of those questions. Instead, the court succinctly says that the case isn’t ripe, so Zuckerman is requesting an unconstitutional advisory opinion. Federal courts do not, and cannot, exist to give advisory opinions to assist investment decisions. from” various precedential cases.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content