This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In what it appears would be a first for a federal circuit court, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is considering adoption of a rule change that would require lawyers and unrepresented litigants to provide a certification regarding their use of artificial intelligence in preparing court filings.
In what it described as a case pitting “real lawyers against a robot lawyer,” a federal court in Illinois has dismissed a law firm’s suit against the self-help legal service DoNotPay. “MK has not alleged any lost revenue or added expenditures as a result of DNP’s conduct,” wrote U.S. .
The litigation analytics company Lex Machina has completed what it describes as a milestone expansion of its data set of courtdocuments, adding another 500,000 federal district court cases so that it now has full coverage of virtually every civil case filed in federal district courts anywhere in the United States.
But today the company is introducing two AI-powered features that further enhance the product by enabling legal professionals to instantly create hyperlinked timelines and ask questions of their documents. Typically, that involves a tedious and time-consuming process of sifting through documents and emails and looking for pertinent dates.
Law Firm Intelligence by Trellis aggregates state trial court data across the Trellis platform enabling users to: look up a particular metric related to a specific law firm (such as, how many cases a law firm had or has against another law firm), and see the actual dockets and documents supporting the metric. Features Include.
A trial is the dramatic apex of the litigation process. A trial preparation checklist can help you and your litigation team stay on track. A trial preparation checklist can help you and your litigation team stay on track. Another aspect of trial preparation is dealing with opposing counsel and the court prior to trial.
Ai.law , a legal technology startup that uses artificial intelligence to generate litigationdocuments, has added a new module that will draft the complaint to initiate a lawsuit. The product, which is in beta, generates a Microsoft Word document formatted for the federal court system.
VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigationdocuments, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigationdocuments. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What problem do you solve?
As a former litigator, Schafer experienced firsthand the frustrating scramble to finalize briefs and prepare filings. She founded ClearBrief in 2020 to leverage AI to analyze documents and suggest relevant evidence and citations to streamline drafting. ClearBrief integrates into Microsoft Word to align with lawyers’ existing workflows.
Trellis AI leverages the largest repository of state trial court data to help litigators evaluate cases, automate brief drafting, suggest winning strategies, and more. Key Witnesses — Identify the people involved in the case and their roles to inform decisions about document requests, interrogatories, and depositions.
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectual property rights. Showing Substantial Similarity of Generative AI Outputs.
Armed with AI, pro se litigants could overwhelm the courts, so the courts need to be prepared to respond in kind. Generative AI could lower the hurdles and the costs for pro se litigants to bring their grievances to court. AI will force courts and lawyers to grapple with new issues over authentication of evidence.
Brett Trout The legal profession is undergoing a digital transformation, with artificial intelligence (AI) playing an increasingly prominent role in legal research and document drafting. The court discovered that eight of those cases did not exist. The Motion That Raised Alarms In Wadsworth v. Walmart Inc. &
Advantages include tax benefits and a court system with special expertise in corporate issues. In states where theyre more often allowed, courts will look at whether theyre reasonable. Courts dont want a non-compete agreement to essentially prevent an employee from earning a living entirely.
The pandemic caused civil courts in the United States to adopt technology at an unprecedented pace and scale, improving participation in court proceedings and helping users resolve disputes more efficiently. Pew researchers examined pandemic-related emergency orders issued by the supreme courts of all 50 states and Washington, D.C.
” The plaintiffs brought a pre-enforcement challenge to the law, but the court denies a preliminary injunction. The court explains: Deepfakes are image, audio, or video files that mimic real or nonexistent people saying and doing things that never happened. The court does realize the overlap here, right? ” Hmm.
Increasingly, however, these technologies present litigation risks under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA). In this blog post, we provide an overview of the technologies that plaintiffs most commonly target for CIPA lawsuits and measures that companies can take to mitigate their CIPA litigation risk.
Whether it’s software for managing legal documents or AI tools for legal document search, be sure to find what works perfectly for your firm. AI does the time-consuming tasks like document verification, research, and case management. Calendar tools for lawyers have multi-user access and automate court date calculations.
How University of Oklahoma law students explored document automation in practice Instructors at OU College of Law in Oklahoma wanted to prepare their students for real-life practice. None of the students had previously been exposed to using document automation software. Elevate your practice with Clio Draft today.
You may know it more through its brands, including ServeNow for finding process servers, One Legal for California court filing, LawToolBox for court calendaring, and the Legal Talk Network group of legal podcasts. says the company is on a mission to innovate and even revolutionize litigation services and the litigation workflow.
For those who have to go to court without a lawyer, navigating the justice system can be daunting. Courtroom5 is a unique justice tech company that addresses that problem by providing pro se litigants with the training, tools, documents and support they need to represent themselves.
For example, a document may cycle through drafting and review, or even information gathering, drafting, and review several times before being completed. For instance, if tasks languish in the review column, perhaps you need more resources for reviewing documents or need to reexamine the review process itself.
As a litigator in Los Angeles, Nicole Clark saw that state court data could be a secret weapon for winning, but she also saw how difficult it was for her and other lawyers to access that data. She also recounts how the company has expanded its coverage so far and describes her plans to eventually cover the courts in every U.S.
Managing an increasing volume of cases and court deadlines– sometimes in multiple jurisdictions – is one of the biggest time management challenges for law firms. . The court ordered additional briefings, but the lawyer then missed multiple deadlines, claiming earlier orders were lost among numerous notifications on his mobile phone.
Your company received a document subpoena in a legal dispute in which it is not involved. If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. The court denied the reimbursement request. In United States v.
Gavin McGrane was a litigation attorney in San Francisco when he saw an opportunity to improve how legal professionals interface with the federal courts electronic records system, PACER, and to enable them to better tap into the data and knowledge contained within that system. . A reminder that we are on Patreon.
Dean Whalen, Chief Legal Officer of Readback, a new AI-assisted deposition court reporting platform, explains how AI-assisted court reporting addresses the stenographer talent crunch — with added benefits. What Is AI-Assisted Court Reporting? AI-assisted court reporting is a hybrid model of AI and humans.
Start With a Clear Purpose Custodian interviews serve multiple critical purposes in litigation, including: Identify where relevant data lives, including on personal devices or unofficial shadow IT appsi.e., Uncover key facts and terminology, because speaking to custodians often reveals context that is not obvious from documents alone.
The document analysis process is notorious for its time demands. AI legal document analysis offers a better way to manage this process. It automates tasks like categorizing documents, extracting key information, and drafting responses. Ultimately, this helps legal teams handle document analysis faster and with greater accuracy.
This tool allows law firms to analyze aggregated and normalized state trial court data to gain competitive intelligence across cases, practice areas, and performance. Collecting this unstructured data from county courts is very challenging, but provides valuable business insights. So that was really never possible before.
When San Francisco lawyer Todd Schneider’s litigation firm, Schneider Wallace , became frustrated with its options for case management software — finding existing products to be antiquated, inflexible, and better suited to transactional practices — the firm decided to build its own.
district judge in Delaware but who last month became a judge of the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit — sided with ROSS. However, the judge did not accept a second antitrust theory asserted by ROSS — that TR had engaged in anticompetitive conduct by pursuing sham litigation. Judge Leonard P.
On this episode of LawNext: An interview recorded live with Erika Harold , executive director of the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism , an organization charged with working to enhance civility and professionalism and to eliminate bias within the legal profession.
A patent is a legal document issued by the U.S. The first step is to document your invention thoroughly. Once you document your invention, consult a patent lawyer to discuss the best approach for protecting your invention. Produce a patent that will stand up in court. What is a patent? Draft clear and enforceable claims.
You may be able to file an extension when things go awry in court, but Santa doesn’t get the same leniency and neither do his trusty elves. Smells Like the Best Lawyer Ever Candle Both candles and lawyers have been known to melt under a little heat though lawyers are better at keeping their cool in court!
“So often when attorneys are writing courtdocuments or preparing for oral arguments and they want to know what their judge thinks about different issues in their case, they have very little information to go off of. federal courts. The company’s roadmap calls for it to eventually expand into state courts as well.
The law firm, Nextpoint Law Group (NLG), will provide discovery and litigation legal services to other law firms and to corporate legal departments, including trial strategy, early case assessment, document review, discovery drafting, legal research and brief writing. Its lawyers will not appear in court.
One way to avoid the cost of downloading documents from the federal courts’ PACER database is by getting them instead from the RECAP Archive , a database of millions of PACER documents and dockets maintained by the Free Law Project. The documents will always be free to download from RECAP.
But that all came crashing down after I reported in 2016 of Bluford’s settlement of a lawsuit charging him with impersonating a lawyer, forging legal documents and fraudulently swindling two clients. When the litigation analytics company Gavelytics shut down in 2022, it was a shock to almost everybody but the founder. Gavelytics.
Trellis Research , an AI-powered state court research and analytics platform, has raised $14.1 Launched in 2018 as a judicial analytics platform for California state courts, Trellis has now broadened into a searchable database of state trial court data, covering courts in 12 states.
Docket Alarm , which is owned by Fastcase , is one of several products on the market that allow legal professionals to search and browse dockets of federal and state courts. If this might speed them up an extra 10 or 15 seconds per document, that would be great.” It works on any court or agency that Docket Alarm covers.
Trellis , a company that provides legal analytics and research for state trial court records, has expanded its coverage into another five states, bringing its total coverage to 21 states. Trellis has now added coverage for courts in Michigan, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Wisconsin. Last year, it raised $14.1
Any litigator will eventually have to contend with motions to compel discovery (also known as motions for discovery). Here, we explore in more detail the role of these motions in modern litigation. A motion for discovery is a legal motion filed to enforce discovery rights, whether in civil or criminal litigation.
A future release will expand these analytics to state courts, Fastcase says. “These analytics, across every case type in federal courts, for the first time allow lawyers to understand the likelihood of success across broad ranges of pleadings and motions before different judges,” Fastcase says. How long will it take?”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content