Remove 2014 Remove Court Remove State law
article thumbnail

What Are the Legal Issues Surrounding Deep Fakes?

Martindale-Avvo

GANs were first introduced in 2014, consisting of several networks working together to produce synthetic data that closely resembles the real thing. The courts have interpreted the Lanham Act to support cases involving the nonconsensual use of a person’s “voice” or “persona” in this manner.

article thumbnail

A New Era of FTC Privacy and Cybersecurity Oversight: Top Ten Things Companies Should Know When Assessing FTC Compliance and Exposure

Debevoise Data Blog

Bedoya is currently a professor at Georgetown Law specializing in privacy law. He founded the school’s Center on Privacy & Technology in 2014 and was previously chief counsel to the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law. 18] In FTC v. Shire ViroPharma, Inc. ,

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Building a Digital Future: Is America Ready for a Federal Digital Bill of Rights?

Richmond Journal of Law and Technology

By: Evan Lees In 2014, the Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Riley v. California , mandating that law enforcement obtain a warrant before searching digital information and underscoring the critical need for privacy protections in the digital age. [1] 373 (2014). [2] The Supreme Court Must Step In.,

article thumbnail

A Roundup of Recent Section 230 Decisions Involving Sex Abuse or CSAM

Eric Goldman

The court says this isn’t a dispositive issue because “Judge Coogler would have come to the conclusion that Defendants were content providers and thus not entitled to immunity under Section 230 even if he had not considered Anderson.” I disagree strongly with this court’s assessment. TikTok ruling. Reddit, Inc.