TechLaw Crossroads

AUGUST 30, 2023

On August 15, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a remarkable and scary decision limiting the rights of US citizens coming back into the country. The Holding The Court held that even though the DHS would not agree to delete the data they kept, Malik had standing to assert a claim to force DHS to delete the material.

Immigration lawyer 111

Immigration lawyer Court Lawyer Judge 111

Legal Tech Monitor

DECEMBER 1, 2023

Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor. From there, she served as assistant attorney general of Arizona, on the Maricopa County Superior Court, and on the Arizona State Court of Appeals. Supreme Court, where she served for the next 25 years. We at IAALS are among the many saddened by the passing of U.S.

Judge 52

Judge Court Attorney Law firm 52

Eric Goldman

JANUARY 18, 2024

My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.

Law 102

Law Law Court Intellectual Property 102

Legal Tech Monitor

MAY 25, 2023

Yesterday I did a blog post about that and noted it tracked the opinion of the Oklahoma Supreme Court released in Oklahoma Bar Association v Weigel , 2014 OK 4 (2014). Prepaid legal fees and refundability of those fees was the subject of American Bar Association Formal Opinion 505.

Time-tracking 59

Time-tracking Law firm Case law Court 59

Richmond Journal of Law and Technology

NOVEMBER 27, 2023

17] An example of this is seen in a 2014 deal struck by Gilead Sciences, the leading marketer of antiretrovirals used to treat HIV/AIDS. [18] 25] However, due to a 2013 Supreme Court decision in Federal Trade Commission v. 1] One in four Americans report that they simply cannot afford to take their medication as prescribed. [2]

Lawsuit 52

Lawsuit Intellectual Property Court Defendant 52

LawSites

MAY 30, 2023

My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. National Financial , in which a lawyer facing sanctions for e-discovery misconduct offered these words in this defense: “I have to confess to this court, I am not computer literate. ” Did that excuse garner sympathy from the court?

Lawyer 109

Lawyer e-discovery Judge e-filing 109

Legal Tech Monitor

AUGUST 30, 2023

On August 15, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals handed down a remarkable and scary decision limiting the rights of US citizens coming back into the country. The Holding The Court held that even though the DHS would not agree to delete the data they kept, Malik had standing to assert a claim to force DHS to delete the material.

Immigration lawyer 59

Immigration lawyer Court Lawyer Judge 59

Law Technology Today

APRIL 18, 2023

“Professed technological incompetence is not an excuse for discovery misconduct” is not a court holding you want to see (James v. CV 8931-VCL, 2014 WL 6845560 (Del. 5, 2014)). In today’s legal profession, lawyers must be technologically competent. This is reinforced by ABA Model Rule of Professional Conduct 1.1

Dispute resolution 82

Dispute resolution Document storage Legal tech Legal tech 82

Eric Goldman

MAY 15, 2024

In so holding, however, the Court declined to resolve the logically antecedent question of whether the discovery rule applies to the three-year copyright statute of limitations, finding “that issue is not properly presented here, because Warner Chappell never challenged the Eleventh Circuit’s use of the discovery rule below.” 1962 (2014).

Court 68

Court e-discovery Defendant e-filing 68

LawSites

OCTOBER 19, 2021

Blue J’s core product uses AI to analyze tax scenarios and predict how courts will resolve them, often with 90% accuracy, the company says. Blue J’s AI predicts court outcomes of tax scenarios with a reported 90% accuracy. Core Platform Predicts Outcomes. The platform tells you the confidence level of its prediction.).

Machine learning 110

Machine learning Court Judge Software 110

LawSites

DECEMBER 27, 2022

The second most popular post was a test of the BriefCatch legal editing software using the leaked draft of the Supreme Court’s opinion in Dobbs v. Supreme Court Justice Ann Timmer on Arizona’s Sweeping Regulatory Reforms. Supreme Court Justice Ann Timmer on Arizona’s Sweeping Regulatory Reforms. How I List These.

Data protection 77

Data protection Analytics Legal tech Legal tech 77

Martindale-Avvo

MAY 7, 2024

GANs were first introduced in 2014, consisting of several networks working together to produce synthetic data that closely resembles the real thing. The courts have interpreted the Lanham Act to support cases involving the nonconsensual use of a person’s “voice” or “persona” in this manner.

Federal law 59

Federal law State law Court Software 59

Legal Tech Monitor

FEBRUARY 29, 2024

So often when attorneys are writing court documents or preparing for oral arguments and they want to know what their judge thinks about different issues in their case, they have very little information to go off of. federal courts. The company’s roadmap calls for it to eventually expand into state courts as well.

Judge 52

Judge Legal tech Legal tech Lawsuit 52

Colin S. Levy

MARCH 7, 2023

Josh Blandi is the CEO and Co-Founder of UniCourt , a SaaS offering using machine learning to disrupt the way court data is organized, accessed, and used. With no real viable options for bulk access to court data available, we started building extractors to grab it from online public court portals.

Due diligence 52

Due diligence Machine learning Court Litigator 52

The Barrister

NOVEMBER 25, 2022

Denton and published by the South Carolina Bar in 2014. S55 D46 2014. South Carolina is a comparative fault state, which means that your damages will be reduced by the percentage of fault the court attributes to your actions. You can find this print book in the law library, call number SC KFS 1990.S55 WHAT AM I ENTITLED TO?

Workers Compensation 52

Workers Compensation Attorney Lawsuit Court 52

Legal Tech Monitor

MAY 30, 2023

My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. National Financial , in which a lawyer facing sanctions for e-discovery misconduct offered these words in this defense: “I have to confess to this court, I am not computer literate. Did that excuse garner sympathy from the court?

Lawyer 52

Lawyer e-discovery Judge e-filing 52

Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 27, 2023

Trademark owner lost a jury trial, allegedly because the court’s instructions to the jury about initial interest confusion were not favorable enough to the rightsowner. Whether to accept that belief as credible is for a jury to decide, not a matter of law for the Court, and summary judgment must be denied.” March 29, 2023).

Defendant 72

Defendant Intellectual Property Court Attorney 72

Attorney at Work

MARCH 25, 2022

According to a “South Dakota Law Review” 2014 study, 20% of the country’s residents live in rural areas, but only 2% of attorneys practice in rural areas or small towns. Court navigators. The results are “legal oases,” said Patrick Goetzinger, former president of the South Dakota State Bar who helped create the program.

Legal marketplace 67

Legal marketplace Court Law firm Lawyer 67

LawSites

DECEMBER 27, 2021

For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). Ontario Court Lays Down the Law on Technology Competence and Video Proceedings (Dec. Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021.

Legal research 52

Legal research Legal tech Legal tech Document automation 52

ABA TECHSHOW

JANUARY 29, 2021

Tepper’s career has included service as an assistant district attorney in North Carolina and in court administration at the Superior Court of Delaware. Nelson was the President of the Virginia State Bar June 2013-June 2014, and is a Past President of the Fairfax Law Foundation, and a Past President of the Fairfax Bar Association.

Practice management 52

Practice management Hearing Case management Court 52

Legal Tech Monitor

FEBRUARY 1, 2024

An individual who elects to try their former lawyer in the court of public opinion rather than before a tribunal and makes serious accusations that put confidential information at issue assumes the risk that such information will be disclosed in the lawyer’s response.

Attorney 52

Attorney Defendant Hearing Lawyer 52

Discovery Advocate

SEPTEMBER 14, 2018

This focus on the cloud came to a head in the 2014 Brown v. While the bar likely took those learnings to heart, adapting to (and learning about) cloud storage solutions as they existed in 2014, recent developments in cloud architecture and record keeping may warrant a “return to class” for litigators as well as attorneys generally.

e-discovery 52

e-discovery e-records Document storage Litigator 52

Eric Goldman

AUGUST 1, 2023

As a result, courts have recognized three types of liability for copyright infringement: direct infringement (“to do” any one of the five exclusive rights), contributory infringement (“to authorize” another to directly infringe) and vicarious liability (based on the relationship between the direct infringer and the person sought to be held liable).

Defendant 95

Defendant Court Litigator Litigation 95

Eric Goldman

MAY 15, 2023

I hope this post makes clear why I get so irritated whenever I see the phrases referenced in a court opinion or invoked by a grandstanding politician. 2014), amended by Doe v. Instagram, LLC , 2022 WL 17342198 (N.D. 30, 2022) * * * Appendix B: Cases Using the Phrase “Get-Out-of-Jail-Free Card” Doe No. 3d 894 (9th Cir.

Litigator 82

Litigator Litigation Court Law 82

Discovery Advocate

NOVEMBER 26, 2018

Microsoft lost the case in 2014 , but won an appeal in 2016. Supreme Court heard argument on the case in February 2018. Supreme Court to drop the pending Microsoft litigation as moot, as the DOJ could (and did) alternatively use the CLOUD Act to issue a new warrant for the data held by Microsoft in Dublin.

Court 52

Court Litigator Litigation Data protection 52

Attorney at Work

MAY 31, 2022

Managing an increasing volume of cases and court deadlines– sometimes in multiple jurisdictions – is one of the biggest time management challenges for law firms. . The firm had filed a voluntary dismissal back in 2014. In a typical year, most courts maintain a schedule for submission of new rules and changes to existing rules.

Court 128

Court Failure-to-appear Time-tracking Immigration lawyer 128

Eric Goldman

JUNE 20, 2023

Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. 569 (1994).

Court 95

Court Failure-to-appear e-discovery e-records 95

Debevoise Data Blog

FEBRUARY 10, 2021

New data breach notification guidance from the European Data Protection Board (“EDPB”), multi-million Euro penalties from DPAs in Germany, Spain and Norway, and court rulings on discriminatory use of algorithms, the one-stop-shop and GDPR’s territorial scope were all in the mix. Deliveroo algorithm ruled discriminatory by Italian court.

Data protection 52

Data protection Time-tracking Defendant Court 52

Discovery Advocate

NOVEMBER 25, 2018

Microsoft lost the case in 2014 , but won an appeal in 2016. Supreme Court heard argument on the case in February 2018. Supreme Court to drop the pending Microsoft litigation as moot, as the DOJ could (and did) alternatively use the CLOUD Act to issue a new warrant for the data held by Microsoft in Dublin.

Court 40

Court Litigator Litigation Compliance 40

ELTA

MARCH 4, 2020

Other accomplishments include helping create ConflictMapp, a tool which helps to unblock the courts and supporting people in resolving their conflicts and authoring various articles for industry publications. Ivy Grey Vice President, Wordrake Chicago, Illinois, USA Ivy is a legal tech entrepreneur, writer, and former practicing lawyer.

Legal tech 52

Legal tech Legal tech Legal technology Legal technology 52

Colin S. Levy

MAY 9, 2023

He has also been admitted to practice before the United State Supreme Court. He was also named one of Houston’s Top Lawyers for Technology by HTexas Magazine in both 2014 and 2015. He’s been a finalist for the ILTA Leadership Award four of the past eight years.

Legal tech 52

Legal tech Legal tech Lawyer Law firm 52

LawSites

DECEMBER 27, 2021

For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). Ontario Court Lays Down the Law on Technology Competence and Video Proceedings (Dec. Top 15 of 2021 – First Published in 2021.

Legal research 21

Legal research Legal tech Legal tech Document automation 21

Legal Expert Connections

FEBRUARY 1, 2016

In November 2014, attorney Steven M. The Florida Supreme Court also rejected his First Amendment claims and in the end, the attorney agreed to a public reprimand and a $1,250 fine. a national legal marketing agency, and author of the book Courting Your Clients. She welcomes all law firm inquiries.

Law firm 52

Law firm Attorney Criminal Defense Law 52

Discovery Advocate

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

Summary of the Case: The Supreme Court, which had initially agreed to consider a circuit split on a privilege issue that commonly arises in discovery, reversed course and dismissed the writ of certiorari as “improvidently granted”—meaning the Supreme Court will not resolve the circuit split this term. In re Grand Jury , 23 F.4th

Court 52

Court Legal advice Litigator Litigation 52

Lawmatics

OCTOBER 17, 2023

Instead of focusing on credentials, Brooks shares an engaging story about personally experiencing a painful slip and fall injury in 2014. It lists availability 24/7, fighting for maximum compensation, tireless advocacy in and out of court, free consultations and compassionate support as reasons to choose him.

Attorney 59

Attorney Law Office Law firm Intellectual Property 59

LawSites

DECEMBER 29, 2021

Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. Do courts fully reopen or not? Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.

Legal tech 144

Legal tech Legal tech Practice management e-filing 144

Eric Goldman

MAY 21, 2023

These uploads have irritated Athos since 2014. The court outlines the plaintiff’s legal theory: because YouTube has automated software that scans videos to help users identify potentially infringing clips, Plaintiff’s DMCA notices imputed on YouTube knowledge of each and every single clip that infringed on a noticed film.

Lawsuit 100

Lawsuit Criminal Defense Court Software 100