2014 Court Legal research 
Above the Law - Technology
FEBRUARY 29, 2024
“We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “They’re actively using the product on live cases, and it’s already informing their legal strategies. federal courts.
Eric Goldman
MAY 31, 2024
In 2014, Medina sued Microsoft. Microsoft’s filings made some unredacted disclosures about Medina that were repeated in an unredacted court opinion, and those documents appeared on several websites that publish court documents. In 2020, Medina got the disclosures from the 2014 case sealed. Hearst case.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Above the Law - Technology
APRIL 11, 2024
ROSS was ahead of its time in striving to use artificial intelligence to empower legal research. It started in 2014 at the University of Toronto as a student-built entrant in a cognitive-computing competition staged by IBM to develop applications for its Watson computer. ROSS Intelligence.
LawSites
MAY 30, 2023
“Your affiant has never utilized Chat GPT as a source for conducting legal research prior to this occurrence and therefore was unaware of the possibility that its content could be false,” his affidavit said. My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. Technology Incompetence?
LawSites
MARCH 18, 2024
Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain and l were sitting down with Daniel Lewis and Nik Reed , the founders of a legal research startup named Ravel Law, along with lawyers from Harvard’s Office of General Counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton and Gundersen Dettmer. About the Author Adam Ziegler is a lawyer and software builder.
Legal Tech Monitor
FEBRUARY 29, 2024
We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “So They’re actively using the product on live cases, and it’s already informing their legal strategies. federal courts.
Legal Tech Monitor
MAY 30, 2023
Your affiant has never utilized Chat GPT as a source for conducting legal research prior to this occurrence and therefore was unaware of the possibility that its content could be false,” his affidavit said. My poster child for this proposition has long been the 2014 Delaware case of James v. Technology Incompetence?
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
275 
Let's personalize your content