This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Your website plays a critical role in how potential clients discover, evaluate, and ultimately choose your law firm. This means your law firms website needs to be accessible to people with vision, hearing, mobility, and cognitive impairments. Reduces legal risk by proactively addressing ADA compliance before a lawsuit occurs.
If youre considering bringing a lawsuit, or if youve been sued by someone else, you may come across a lot of unfamiliar terms and concepts. A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. What Can You Ask a Court To Do?
Amazon , where Xiaohua Huang, a pro se litigant, attempted to enforce his patents against Amazon. Huangs case was dismissed because the lawsuit he filed lacked the required specificity, failed to identify particular infringing products, and contained vague, conclusory allegations. Contact us today for a free consultation.
Generative AI’s (“genAI”) ability to “deepfake” audiovisual evidence presents dual concerns: (1) parties could present deepfaked evidence as real, or (2) parties could challenge real evidence as deepfaked, requiring resources for evidence validation on top of the already lengthy and expensive litigation process. In Huang v.
The key is crafting you patent not only for breadth, but with an eye toward litigation. Understanding Patent Prosecution vs. Litigation Patent prosecution involves the process of drafting, filing, and negotiating with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to obtain a valid patent.
Although the case was just settled, this lawsuit was not Nikes first foray into patent infringement litigationnor is it likely to be its last. In its lawsuit, Nike sought both damages and a permanent injunction to stop Lululemon from producing the allegedly infringing designs. The lawsuit was settled in 2021.
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectual property rights. In Millette v. OpenAI, Inc.,
Even for smaller cases, where the damages are less than $1 million, the patent litigation costs average $700,000. While a contingent fee arrangement does not cover third-party costs such as expert witness fees, they cover attorneys fees which typically make up the vast majority of litigation costs. What Is a Contingent Fee Structure?
Leveraging Litigation Analytics Litigation is data-intensive, and making sense of this data is crucial for managing risks effectively. GCs and their teams should begin by gathering and analyzing historical litigation data, not as a one-time exercise but as an ongoing practice.
In other words… plaintiffs are once again arguing that deploying biometric-based age authentication violates privacy law. (I Note: some laws, like Australia, ban authenticators from using government IDs for authentication purposes, leaving few remaining viable options other than face scans). See Kuklinski v.Binance ). Martell v.
Implications for the Intellectual Property and Legal Community The FTCs lawsuit against Deere raises important questions about how intellectual property rights intersect with antitrust law and consumer protection. Competition: Empowering independent repair shops promotes market competition and innovation.
Riehl asked ChatGPT to summarize a lawsuit involving the foundation. Riehl knew that ChatGPT’s claim was fishy and that the ChatGPT version he was using had an index cutoff date before the lawsuit filing. Implications Wow, this lawsuit was terrible. ” Life is too short to file lawsuits like this.
Because patent law isnt just about filling out forms and submitting diagrams. Why Litigation Experience Matters in a Patent Attorney One of the most overlooked but highly valuable assets in a patent attorney is litigation experience specifically, experience arguing patent cases in federal court.
Separately, he brought a lawsuit over the Are We Dating the Same Guy? Despite the dismissal, I view this case as a warning sign of how anti-doxxing statutes will contribute to lots of meritless and problematic litigation. Defendant-victimization is also a main justification for broadly applicable anti-SLAPP laws.
Increasingly, however, these technologies present litigation risks under the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA). In this blog post, we provide an overview of the technologies that plaintiffs most commonly target for CIPA lawsuits and measures that companies can take to mitigate their CIPA litigation risk.
Brett Trout In a high-stakes patent litigation case, Alpha Modus Corp. has filed a lawsuit against Walgreens Co. Investors and speculators doubled the price of Alpha Modus stock last week, likely in anticipation of this lawsuit, before the price dropped back down this week to about a sixty percent overall increase. in the U.S.
In the intricate realm of patent litigation, the choice of legal representation can significantly influence the outcome of a case. Valve Corporation underscores the critical importance of choosing a patent litigator who is tough, but not unreasonably tough. Brett Trout In a word, yes.
Brett Trout Patent litigation is often complex and high-stakes, but the case involvingLeigh Rothschild, Starbucks, and attorney Rachael Lamkinhas taken an unusual turn, morphing from a patent infringement lawsuit into allegations of fraud, and now, a defamation battle? from defendants through AT.
This is where law firm predictive analytics come to the rescue. By leveraging AI and other technologies, law firms can uncover patterns and trends across vast datasetsturning raw information into actionable insight. What is predictive analytics for law firms?
Corporations are legally independent entities, so a creditor or a person filing a lawsuit against a corporation usually cant reach your personal assets, although there are some exceptions. Some people also may find it a hassle to comply with the strict requirements under state law for starting and operating a corporation.
When litigation seems likely, the first critical step is preserving data. A legal hold, or litigation hold, requires organizations to preserve relevant data during or ahead of legal proceedings. A single overlooked employee might hold critical emails or texts that change the course of a lawsuit. Legal holds aren’t optional.
Recently, the companys aggressive enforcement of its intellectual property (IP) has taken center stage, with high-profile lawsuits targeting game modders, emulator developers, and companies like Pocketpair, the creators of Palworld. The lawsuit seeks damages and an injunction against the games continued distribution?
In my last post , I discussed how evolving technology will continue to influence our relationships and thus, impact family law. We have all heard about the lawsuit involving Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. This is often the case in family law matters. Even public figures are not immune to the potential impact of text messages.
Trellis, the leading provider of trial court data and insights, has partnered with international labor and employment law firm Fisher Phillips to integrate its generative AI built for trial court litigation, Trellis AI, into the firms daily case alerts.
law to add supporting case law. Ayala does not appear to have learned that the cases were non-existent until the court identified the questionable cases and issued an order to show cause demanding the attorneys and law firms involved produce the cited cases or face sanctions. Mr. Ayala had uploaded the motion onto MX2.law
Judge William Alsup ruled that Anthropic, the AI company behind the Claude chatbot, did not break the law by training its models on copyrighted books—at least not when it comes to how the books were used. copyright law. Brett Trout A federal court in San Francisco just handed down a ruling that is shaking up authors and AI users alike.
The exact definition of a trade secret is governed by state law and, therefore varies from state to state. Prepare for Litigation Draft contracts that account for AI-generated trade secrets Work with counsel to ensure NDAs and IP clauses hold up in court If a breach happens, move fast—evidence disappears quickly 5.
They used litigation or licensing strategically asserting their rights early, often, and aggressively. Takeaway: Early enforcement with top-tier litigators, paired with clearly drafted patent claims, can cement your dominance in a fast-moving field. Are you prepared to litigate (or threaten to)? The result?
They possess the expertise to navigate the complexities of patent law, draft robust claims, and provide detailed descriptions to reduce the likelihood your patent eventually gets thrown out of court for lack of adequate disclosure.
Innovations in artificial intelligence (AI), particularly generative AI (GenAI), cloud computing, and data analytics, present both challenges and opportunities for law firms and in-house legal departments. For law firms, the question centers on how to deploy these tools without undermining the billable hour model that underpins profitability.
Let’s say someone prints a part that violates export laws or infringes on a patent or copyright. If that part ends up on social media or in the middle of a lawsuit, a single photo could trace it back to the exact machine—and possibly the person—who printed it. Could this become part of 3D printing lawsuit investigations?
Customs enforcement, or litigation if needed. While there are many attorneys capable of registering your trademark, it is a good idea to choose a trademark attorney with extensive experience with not only prosecuting trademarks before the Patent and Trademark Office, but also one with experience litigating trademark disputes in federal court.
The landscape of mass torts in 2025 builds on the active litigation from the past few years. Litigation over PFAS in various arenas could continue as these chemicals are in products as diverse as packaging and carpets. Attorneys are expected to rely on law that has worked to protect people from toxic environmental substances.
This is the instant-classic lawsuit involving a Saskatchewan farmer who text-messaged a “thumbs-up” emoji in response to an offer to buy his flax. That judge was surely dealing with an emoji interpretation case for his first time, and operates in a community not known for being at the cutting edge of technology law.
The conference featured a wide range of insightful sessionscovering topics from artificial intelligence, custodian interviews with modern data challenges, case law updates, and social media collection and analysis. The reticence on the face of many in the room underscored the power of this tool in the hands of e-discovery professionals.
It can also help with legal research, finding relevant case laws or statutes quickly without endless hours of manual searching. For instance, machine learning can predict litigation risks based on similar cases, identify trends that might impact a client, or flag unusual clauses in contracts that might need extra attention.
The plaintiff brought a putative class action lawsuit against Capital One based on Washington’s anti-spam law and related claims. Section 230 wasn’t a main issue in most of those litigation battles, and it doesn’t work here. Capital One appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
This lawsuit purports to focuses on the allegedly defective operation of the services’ reporting tools, but the plaintiffs’ goal was to hold the services accountable for their alleged inaction in response to some reports. Such allegations fail to state a claim under products liability law. removal of the reported videos.
A reminder: this lawsuit is a battle royale. Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation , 2024 WL 4532937 (N.D. Social Media Adolescent Addiction/Personal Injury Products Liability Litigation , 4:22-md-03047-YGR (N.D. I’m sure the appellate court will be eager to docket this one.
On June 27, 2025, Lululemon filed a federal lawsuit accusing Costco of selling “confusingly similar” knockoffs of its best-selling clothes—including its Scuba hoodies, Define jackets, and ABC pants. What is the Lawsuit About? If the design is functional, it cannot be protected under trade dress law.
Startup IYO, spun out of Google’s moonshot X lab, just won a major victory in its lawsuit against OpenAI, Sam Altman, and Ive’s design studio LoveFrom. The lawsuit alleges this wasn’t just a coincidence. A federal judge stepping in to put the brakes on OpenAI and its new venture with famed Apple designer Jony Ive. On Friday, U.S.
Legal assistants are important contributors to a law firm’s success and are integral to its day-to-day operations. Because of their effective organizational skills and knowledge of law, they affect the dynamics of the ever-dynamic legal world. What does a legal assistant do? But they are not the same.
A client that understands the legal claims will have a better appreciation of the risks of litigation. Here’s how to foster good communication between litigator and client, with “you” addressing the former. Also, don’t brush off inquiries from your client about non-monetary outcomes for their lawsuit.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content