This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
“We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did.
But ROSS countered that the databases TR maintains of public law and its legal search tools are, in fact, separate products, and that TR conditions access to the databases on purchase of the search tools. Judge Leonard P. Stark — who previously presided over the case as a U.S.
AI in Litigation and Case Management: Transforming the Legal Landscape Technology is in every aspect of our lives; the legal field is no exception. The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into litigation and case management is revolutionizing how legal professionals operate.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 25, which we posted on Dec. BriefCatch BriefCatch empowers lawyers and judges to edit legal documents to the highest standards while helping their clients win, boosting their writing skills, and enjoying expert explanations, models, and examples.
Well before launching CoCounsel this year, it had already launched the powerful neural net search technology AllSearch and had pioneered products such as Compose , to help lawyers draft litigation briefs, and, in 2016 , CARA, the first product to use AI to analyze briefs, which spawned a generation of copycat products.
Further insights could be gleaned based on the type of case, jurisdiction, judge, or even opposing counsel. Predictive analytics can also guide whether to settle or proceed to court on a file based on analysis of past settlements, litigation costs, and opposing counsels behavior. The result?
State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting 2019: ‘Get Paid and Have a Life’ with Judge Audrey Moorehead. Judge Audrey Moorehead joins guest hosts Sally Pretorius of Kooners Fuller and Baili Rhodes of West Webb Allbritton & Gentry to talk about the importance of getting paid, having a life, and joining your local or specialty bar.
He became interested in the future of legal education and how artificial intelligence will affect the profession, which led him to co-found Blue J , a legal technology company in Toronto. On the other hand, Abdi Aidid practiced as a commercial litigator in New York before becoming the Vice President of LegalResearch at Blue J.
A first-of-its-kind tool introduced last year to automate the drafting of litigation briefs has been named new product of the year for 2021 by the American Association of Law Libraries. CARA has since spawned a generation of similar products from other legalresearch companies. Casetext says it can cut brief-writing time by 76%.
On this episode of The Geek in Review, hosts Marlene Gebauer and Greg Lambert delve into how AI can transform legal writing with ClearBrief founder and CEO Jacqueline Schafer. As a former litigator, Schafer experienced firsthand the frustrating scramble to finalize briefs and prepare filings. Excuse was Sorry, didn’t check it.
Over the years, the list has included a diverse selection of lawyers, legal technologists, policymakers, judges, law librarians, bar association executives, and people from all walks of life who are innovating in the legal profession. (I Laurent Wiesel , Litigation Knowledge Lawyer, Simpson Thatcher.
Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents.
Here, we explore essential aspects of filing a motion for change of venue and cover legal justifications, procedural steps, common challenges, and notable case examples. Are you a busy litigator constantly on the move? Judicial decision : The judge will decide whether to grant or deny your motion based on the evidence and arguments.
Thomson Reuters offers one of the leading legal search engines on the market, Westlaw, which contains not only copies of cases, statutes, and other legal materials but also content created by Westlaw itself to assist in legalresearch. some creative spark. Feist Publications, Inc. 340 (1991).
The pace of litigation is dizzying. There was no effective way to perform practical legalresearch on state trial court records. The names of judges, attorneys and law firms are subject to change, a fact that makes it hard — if not impossible — to track legal entities across any given data set.
Avianca , and in the wake of all the publicity those cases have received, you would think most lawyers would have gotten the message not to rely on ChatGPT for legalresearch, at least not without checking the results. Karlen , the unwitting litigant filed an appellate brief in which 22 of 24 cases were fictitious.
In a major update to its platform being released today, Fastcase is beginning to deliver on that promise with the first of several planned Judicata-based product offerings — analytics showing how often federal motions are granted and how long different judges take to rule. How long will it take?” “How
A new integration between two litigation-focused legal technology products connects more than 500 million federal and state litigation dockets and documents with a database of expert witness and judicial profiles, with the aim of helping lawyers better evaluate expert witnesses. ”
It can also help with legalresearch, finding relevant case laws or statutes quickly without endless hours of manual searching. Its like giving the system a library of past contracts, case outcomes, or legal trends to analyze so it can make better predictions and decisions.
One of the riskiest aspects of litigation practice is spoliation — the destruction or alteration of evidence — which can carry costly sanctions for both lawyers and their clients. “Being able to see with a few clicks, in any jurisdiction across the U.S., “Being able to see with a few clicks, in any jurisdiction across the U.S.,
The legal profession is a complex and multifaceted field, comprising various roles that serve distinct purposes. Among these roles, lawyers and litigators often create confusion due to their similarities. They handle a wide range of legal matters, including contract drafting, negotiations, and legal documentation.
At the Association of Legal Administrators annual conference today in Austin, Texas, NetDocuments is unveiling a powerful knowledge management product to automatically add legalresearch intelligence to litigation documents, through a partnership with LexisNexis. Enhancing Litigation Documents. motion, brief, etc.),
Keeping up on the litigation landscape with AI-powered legal analytics can help cultivate productive and meaningful client relationships. “As Mammen describes a practice many commercial litigators use to tap into new business opportunities. With registered alerts on a legal analytics platform , litigators can stay proactive.
Today's TL NewsWire Hot Product enables you to analyze the historical record of experts and judges to inform your case strategy, including an expert's track record on Daubert challenges and citations your judge prefers (see article below). But it's not a good idea when it comes to the expert witnesses and the judges in your cases.
We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “So They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did. What we offer are explanatory insights into judges’ rulings.”
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 26, which we posted on Jan. Legion AI Associate We are building AI agents that draft discovery and motions for litigation lawyers, allowing lawyers to customize each document in their own voice and generate work product on their own template.
The legal profession can be complex, and the terminology used to describe various legal professionals often leads to confusion. In this blog, we will delve into the distinctions between a lawyer, attorney, and litigator. Lawyers possess a wide range of skills, including legalresearch, negotiation, and drafting legal documents.
With continual advancements in technology, this blog post aims to delve into the diverse ways plaintiff attorneys utilize these tools to effectively navigate the intricacies of their legal practice, adapt, and stay ahead. These tools offer unparalleled access to extensive databases of legal information, precedents, and case law.
Trellis’ new state court analytics tools provide much needed insights into litigators and their law firms which will lead to better strategic decisions. Trellis is a state court legalresearch and analytics platform. Despite all the talk about litigation analytics, most litigation occurs in state court.
Trellis’ new state court analytics tools provide much needed insights into litigators and their law firms which will lead to better strategic decisions. Trellis is a state court legalresearch and analytics platform. Despite all the talk about litigation analytics, most litigation occurs in state court.
Legal recruiting is an important business development tool for law firms looking to expand their client roster, build up their practice areas, and open offices in new locations. In this second article, let’s discuss how firms can use litigation data to make their legal recruiting a more successful and profitable endeavor.
Harvard professor Jonathan Zittrain and l were sitting down with Daniel Lewis and Nik Reed , the founders of a legalresearch startup named Ravel Law, along with lawyers from Harvard’s Office of General Counsel, Debevoise & Plimpton and Gundersen Dettmer. This was early 2015, on my commute to Cambridge, Mass., We decided not to.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 40, which we posted on Jan. Calloquy Platform Calloquy is dedicated to making remote legal proceedings safe, secure, and efficient, both to reduce cost and risk for corporate litigants and to expand access to justice for underserved communities.
I have been amazed at the knee-jerk and head in the sand reaction of many courts to the use of Gen AI by lawyers appearing before them and the use by judges. Several judges have demanded that lawyers disclose the use of Gen AI and, if so, verify the accuracy of the citations that have been used. It emphasizes education over edicts.
This is why legal project management is turning into a field of its own, innovating industry-specific techniques for improving client service and efficiency, in ways that increase client involvement and transparency. As law students, few litigators imagined themselves transitioning into project management roles after passing the bar.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed down the applications. Note: The ballot was supposed to list 25 companies, but because of a tie in the initial round of voting by judges, 26 companies are listed.). Target customer: Solo to small firms, legal departments. In December, we issued a call for entries.
A law clerk is a legal professional who supports attorneys, judges, or legal departments by conducting legalresearch, analyzing cases, and preparing legal documents. Law clerks often carry varying degrees of responsibility based on the court, judge, law firm, or company they work for.
He became interested in the future of legal education and how artificial intelligence will affect the profession, which led him to co-found Blue J , a legal technology company in Toronto. On the other hand, Abdi Aidid practiced as a commercial litigator in New York before becoming the Vice President of LegalResearch at Blue J.
Well before launching CoCounsel this year, it had already launched the powerful neural net search technology AllSearch and had pioneered products such as Compose , to help lawyers draft litigation briefs, and, in 2016 , CARA, the first product to use AI to analyze briefs, which spawned a generation of copycat products.
These hearings are where attorneys argue specific requests before a judge, and the outcomes can greatly influence a case. Whether it’s trying to get a case dismissed, pushing for key evidence, or seeking a preliminary ruling, mastering motion hearings is a key part of effective legal practice.
In past years, the judges narrowed the ballot to 25 semifinalists. This year, out of the 55 applications we received, the judges felt that so many deserved the opportunity to compete that we eliminated only 15 and we are putting the rest out for your votes. Learn more about this company at the LawNext Legal Tech Directory.
Michael Sander , the founder of Docket Alarm , a product that mines federal and state court dockets to provide litigation alerts and case analytics, has left the company, seven months after its acquisition by legalresearch company vLex in April. Here is his entire email: “My last day running Docket Alarm will be today.
Imagine a world where your in-house legal team can predict litigation outcomes, automate tedious document reviews, and ensure compliance with evolving regulations—all while cutting costs and boosting efficiency. As AI continues to redefine the legal landscape, it’s crucial to stay informed about the tools making the biggest impact.
Imagine a world where your in-house legal team can predict litigation outcomes, automate tedious document reviews, and ensure compliance with evolving regulations—all while cutting costs and boosting efficiency. As AI continues to redefine the legal landscape, it’s crucial to stay informed about the tools making the biggest impact.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content