This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Brett Trout In a significant decision for copyright law and legal technology, Judge Stephanos Bibas granted partial summary judgment in favor of Thomson Reuters, rejecting ROSS Intelligences fair use defense in a closely watched lawsuit over the use of Westlaws legal content.
Brett Trout The legal profession is undergoing a digital transformation, with artificial intelligence (AI) playing an increasingly prominent role in legalresearch and document drafting. Some states even require attorneys to stay abreast of technological advancements, such as AI, in the legal field.
It can also help with legalresearch, finding relevant case laws or statutes quickly without endless hours of manual searching. AI-Powered LegalResearch Tools AI legalresearch tools take the hassle out of finding case law, statutes, and precedents. What Are The Benefits of Adopting AI-Powered Legal Tech?
A court case might involve reviewing a client’s social media account, emails, and digital documents to determine the merits of an intellectualpropertylawsuit. As more businesses and individuals generate and store their data electronically, the need for legal professionals to manage and review this data also grows.
Whether copyrighted works can be freely used to train generative artificial intelligence (“AI”) models is at the core of dozens of lawsuits filed since AI burst onto the scene several years ago. In Thomson Reuters, the plaintiff and defendant created legalresearch tools with the same purpose and were in direct competition.
And the one thing I told them is this is not a legalresearch, pure legalresearch tool. And that’s one thing, providing it a change control clause, which is proprietary, valuable intellectualproperty for that organization. As these lawsuits get brought to open AI.
And the one thing I told them is this is not a legalresearch, pure legalresearch tool. And that’s one thing, providing it a change control clause, which is proprietary, valuable intellectualproperty for that organization. As these lawsuits get brought to open AI.
Ross used third-party LegalEase’s Bulk Memos—compilations of legal questions with answers based on Westlaw headnotes—as training data to create a legalresearch tool that could produce quotations from judicial opinions in response to natural language questions. Many uses, however, will fall somewhere in between. [2] 11, 2025).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content