Failure-to-appear, Hearing and State law

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

Failure-to-appear

Hearing

State law

Section 230 Immunizes Snap, Even if It’s “Inherently Dangerous”–L.W. v. Snap

Eric Goldman

JUNE 7, 2023

” This does not persuade the judge: the Court must treat Defendants as publishers or speakers, regardless of how their claims are framed, because their theories of liability plainly turn on Defendants’ alleged failure to monitor and remove third-party content. To get around Section 230, the plaintiffs attempted the Lemmon v.

Failure-to-appear

Failure-to-appear Defendant Lawsuit Court

Grindr Defeats FOSTA Claim–Doe v. Grindr

Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 29, 2023

Ultimately, the alleged “defect” here is only relevant to Doe’s injury to the extent it made it easier or more difficult for other users to communicate with Doe, and thus Doe seeks to hold Grindr liable for its failure to regulate third party content. Doe sued Grindr for strict products liability, negligence, and FOSTA. ICS Provider.

Lawsuit

Lawsuit Defendant Court Failure-to-appear

Legal Tech Connection

Section 230 Immunizes Snap, Even if It’s “Inherently Dangerous”–L.W. v. Snap

Grindr Defeats FOSTA Claim–Doe v. Grindr

Stay Connected