Defendant, Failure-to-appear, Hearing and State law

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

Defendant

Failure-to-appear

Hearing

State law

Section 230 Immunizes Snap, Even if It’s “Inherently Dangerous”–L.W. v. Snap

Eric Goldman

JUNE 7, 2023

The plaintiffs asserted products liability and related claims against Snap, on the premise that Snap “is an inherently dangerous software product that Defendants deceptively advertise and promote in a way that facilitates sex crimes against children.” To get around Section 230, the plaintiffs attempted the Lemmon v.

Failure-to-appear

Failure-to-appear Defendant Lawsuit Court

Grindr Defeats FOSTA Claim–Doe v. Grindr

Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 29, 2023

Ultimately, the alleged “defect” here is only relevant to Doe’s injury to the extent it made it easier or more difficult for other users to communicate with Doe, and thus Doe seeks to hold Grindr liable for its failure to regulate third party content. Doe sued Grindr for strict products liability, negligence, and FOSTA. ICS Provider.

Lawsuit

Lawsuit Court Defendant Failure-to-appear

Legal Tech Connection

Section 230 Immunizes Snap, Even if It’s “Inherently Dangerous”–L.W. v. Snap

Grindr Defeats FOSTA Claim–Doe v. Grindr

Stay Connected