This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The decision considered that although pseudonymized information is personal data in the hands of the original data controller, it may not be personal data in the hands of third parties if they cannot identify individuals from it.
Relying on an employee’s memory without an accompanying thorough discussion – informed by potentially relevant technical considerations of where data may reside and a more robust effort to locate it – is unlikely to constitute a “reasonable search” for purposes of defending a response to a request for non-objectionable discovery.
Relying on an employee’s memory without an accompanying thorough discussion – informed by potentially relevant technical considerations of where data may reside and a more robust effort to locate it – is unlikely to constitute a “reasonable search” for purposes of defending a response to a request for non-objectionable discovery.
But we know that, for example, thinking about the privacy governance example, we know that AI systems can present risks and never touch personal information at all. And all of the other statelaws have come out as a good example, privacy regulation that is much more specific and technical in nature. Most recently, I think CPRA.
Since its initial adoption in 2000, Reg S-P has required broker-dealers, investment companies and registered investment advisers (“Covered Institutions”) [1] to adopt written policies and procedures to safeguard customer records and information (the “Safeguards Rule”) and to properly dispose of consumer report information (the “Disposal Rule”).
Much of Professor Van Houweling’s research focuses on copyright law’s implications for new information technologies. There are lots of ways in which recording your ownership claim on the blockchain are not going to, in fact, protect the value of your investment. The information presented here does not constitute legal advice.
But we know that, for example, thinking about the privacy governance example, we know that AI systems can present risks and never touch personal information at all. And all of the other statelaws have come out as a good example, privacy regulation that is much more specific and technical in nature. Most recently, I think CPRA.
Electronic signatures (or e-signatures) have become nearly ubiquitous in everyday life and business—from confirming your agreement to terms and conditions on a website, to using e-signature tools to sign a work contract. What is an e-signature? The ESIGN Act supersedes statelaws that may conflict with the act’s provisions.
In addition, the tax practitioners they work with must understand the specific accounting and tax concerns that lawyers and law firms have. “ “ Today, it takes more brains and effort to make out the income tax form than it does to make the income. ” — Alfred E. IRS Form 1065. IRS Form 1040-ES.
These new measures include public reporting on the FTC’s criminal referral efforts on a regular basis, the development of guidelines for referrals and regular meetings with federal, state, and local criminal authorities to facilitate coordination. The FTC is also authorized to obtain consumer redress for rule violations (see below).
The Report summarizes key themes from comments from a variety of industry stakeholders (respondents) in response to Treasurys June 2024 Request for Information (RFI), and recommends several next steps for financial regulators, financial services firms, and government agencies more broadly for coordination purposes. Inconsistent StateLaws.
E-discovery professionals are on the front lines of detecting deep fakes used as evidence, according to Marathe. Overall, it was an informative if sobering discussion on the state of the legal system’s preparedness for inevitable collisions with deep fake technology. Deepfakes Are Coming to Courts. free registration req.)
E-discovery professionals are on the front lines of detecting deep fakes used as evidence, according to Marathe. Overall, it was an informative if sobering discussion on the state of the legal system’s preparedness for inevitable collisions with deep fake technology. Deepfakes Are Coming to Courts. free registration req.)
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content