This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
” Florida’s statutory definition: Social media platform means any information service, system, Internet search engine, or access software provider that: 1. The court recognizes this drafting flaw: the text of the social media platform definition is broad. This is the post-SCOTUS remand of Moody v.
South Korea has become the latest country to pass a national AI law. In this article, we provide an overview of the Basic Acts requirements that are most relevant to businesses and compare them to the obligations of other AI-specific laws. Basic Acts Scope: Who Has to Comply?
The term “advisal” appears 29 times in this opinion, which confused me on two fronts. Second, the word “advisal” is not being used for its dictionary definition. The definition of “advisal” is giving advice, making it sound like a consumer disclosure than a legally operative call-to-action.
Almost all of the major legal scraping precedents happened in the Northern District, and it is definitely unusual that this was filed in state court. And there is a legal regime dedicated to that issue, and it’s called copyright law. The legal headlines are more of a trickle than the flood I was expected. That’s the rub.
Failure to comply with the SCA when responding to subpoenas can lead to significant legal and financial repercussions, reputational damage, and even loss of customer trust. With the prevalence of computer use by the 1980s, the original law became outdated and needed to be revised.
Depending on the final wording, the Congressional Republicans’ proposed moratorium on state AI laws may or may not ameliorate that risk. * * * This case involves a tragic teenage suicide. Online addiction lawsuits are proliferating across the country, a trend that will continue so long as plaintiffs think they can win. Character.ai
Under it, one party shares some sensitive information with the other party, and such a person is bound by law not to disclose it to an unauthorized third party. Protection of Sensitive Information: An NDA by law requires the parties involved not to disclose the information that is being shared.
Justis, powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4, was able to have a natural conversation with Greg and provide insightful perspectives on the use of generative AI in the legal industry, specifically in law firms. While many law firm leaders recognize its potential, some are unsure of how it fits into legal work or worry about risks.
But if you really want Kiwi Farms gone, have you considered using copyright law for its censorial power? For unexplained reasons, it does not appear that the defendants are invoking the 512 defense. As a result, the opinion only discusses common law contributory infringement claims. CloudFlare’s block ).
A small law firm can be a challenging entrepreneurial endeavor. Is a law firm considered a startup as it’s getting off the ground? While a law firm might not fit the traditional image of a startup, a new legal business does have those same elements of a new business getting off the ground. Can a Law Firm Be a Startup?
When lawyers start talking about stress and depression, they are usually talking about the effect their law practice has on their sense of well-being, self-value and self-esteem. In other words, you may be perceiving the practice of law in a flawed manner, and the good news is that can be corrected. Compassion. Perspective.
A small law firm can be a challenging entrepreneurial endeavor. Is a law firm considered a startup as it’s getting off the ground? While a law firm might not fit the traditional image of a startup, a new legal business does have those same elements of a new business getting off the ground. Can a Law Firm Be a Startup?
Another 3k+ word post about the jurisprudential chaos in online contract formation law. You’ll notice that this post gets increasingly surly as the cumulative effect of the judicial inanity weighed on me. August 9, 2023) This case involves StubHub’s obligations to provide refunds due to COVID cancellations. Citing Sellers v.
Today was the 2023 Super Bowl of Internet Law at the U.S. FN: I say the 2023 Super Bowl because the Supreme Court necessarily will be taking Internet Law cases every term for the foreseeable future, and each new Internet Law case they take has the capacity to rock our world.] Supreme Court [FN]. Taamneh and Gonzalez v.
We’ve seen a flood of terrible Internet laws in the past few years, including the California Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC). Regulated expressive conduct The AADC frames itself a “privacy” law, but that’s always been a gross lie. [Sorry it’s take me this long to get this blog post off my desk.
Note 2: when I worked at the law firm in the 1990s, the firm’s voicemail system allowed senders to send ringless voicemails, i.e., voicemails not preceded by a phone call. The court is engaging in a standard analysis of technological definitions, which frequently age poorly as the technology evolves. Ugh, I hated that!]
GitHub, Inc. is one of the first major class-action lawsuits to dive into questions of online collection of “public data” and generative AI training data sets. On May 11th, the court ruled on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss , granting in part and denying in part. The court also held that plaintiffs were permitted to proceed pseudonymously.
A 36-hour deadline appears to be one of the most rigorous timeframes of any U.S. Background Banking organizations already are subject to reporting obligations of cyber events and data breaches under applicable federal and state laws. breach reporting scheme. Below we provide context for the Proposed Rule and outline its key features.
Personal data definition Pseudonymised data is only personal data if it can be re-identified using reasonable means, i.e. a person is “reasonably likely to use” (time, cost and effort involved, technology and resources available to the person). What are the main proposed changes? The UK government wishes to maintain data adequacy with the EU.
This issue has already attracted studies and publications in the United States, where various operating models of StaaS providers are assessed through the prism of the grounds developed in the case law for recognition of a given relationship as an “investment contract”(known as the “ Howey test”). Under Art. 5 of Directive 2009/65/EC).
Koerner Endowed Professor of Law, Tulane University Law School [See part 1 about defendant opt-outs and part 2 about defendant defaults.] By guest blogger Elizabeth Townsend Gard , John E. Eight months after filing, the first two Copyright Claims Board (CCB) Final Determinations have been handed down. Let’s take a look.
The Revised Amendment narrows the definition of a Class A company by adding that, “when calculating the number of employees and gross annual revenue, affiliates shall include only those that share information systems, cybersecurity resources or all or any part of a cybersecurity program with the covered entity.”
Justis, powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4, was able to have a natural conversation with Greg and provide insightful perspectives on the use of generative AI in the legal industry, specifically in law firms. While many law firm leaders recognize its potential, some are unsure of how it fits into legal work or worry about risks.
Lately it seems like every legal new source is releasing whitepapers and webinars on topics like “How To Do More With Less?”, “Use Data to Drive Business Decisions”, “Improve Your Contracting Process”, and “Minimize Your Outside Counsel Spend”. Legal professionals are inundated with emails and overwhelmed.
There has been significant regulatory attention recently to “dark patterns,” including FTC guidance , state privacy laws , and state and federal enforcement actions. Some of this activity involves new regulations, and some is based on decades-old consumer protection laws that prohibit unfair and deceptive practices.
Consent for use of personal data: The German competition regulator used national competition laws to extend the Digital Market Act’s user consent requirements to additional Google services offered within Germany. Data Privacy Framework: EU businesses intending to take advantage of the EU-U.S. providers, notwithstanding the framework.
On November 9, 2022, the New York Department of Financial Services (the “NYDFS”) announced the publication of the official proposed amendments to its 2017 Cybersecurity Regulation 23 NYCRR 500 (the “Proposed Amendments”). The 60-day public comment period to the Proposed Amendments ends on January 9, 2023. respectively).
How have law firms supported their clients during the COVID-19 pandemic? While law firms may not have all the answers — let’s face it, there is no playbook for this — firms that are flexible, agile and innovative can best serve their clients and stand apart from their competition. Anticipating Changing Needs.
The plaintiffs claim that, “by enabling the transmission of ephemeral content on the application, Defendants facilitate the exchange of CSAM, and that Snap’s design of the application assists users in ‘evad[ing] supervision by legal guardians or law enforcement.'” Snap workaround.
With that framing, trademark law protects against the unwanted competition, and the court treats this as an easy rightsowner win. The court says those aren’t DMCA takedown notices by definition, because they didn’t assert any copyright interests; so they are outside 512(f)’s scope.
The categorization of social media accounts into “business” and “personal” accounts was a hot issue a decade ago, when states across the country passed laws to protect employees from invasive employer demands to access or control their personal social media accounts. The court doesn’t endorse this test.
As I’ve previously written, for many years after the DMCA passed, everyone assumed that 17 USC 512(a) completely shielded Internet access providers from liability for subscribers’ copyright infringements. If 512(a) provided full immunity, the Copyright Alert System was unnecessary and pernicious to both IAPs and their subscribers.
Candidate, 2026 On March 15, 2022, President Biden signed the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022 (CIRCIA) into law. Comments from around the business community emphasize two primary adverse consequences of an overly broad definition of “covered entities.” By David Bernstein, J.D. Second, the U.S.
I can’t see what’s happening in state court, but I have no reason to believe that it’s any less contentious. The cases reached important milestones last Fall, when both the federal and state court judges denied the social media defendants’ Section 230 motions to dismiss. However, this is not the final word in the matter.
Goodness gracious, I could teach an entire semester of Internet Law focused solely on Uber’s TOS formation. It’s a source of never-ending, and sometimes avoidable, drama. This opinion is a companion to the Massachusetts Supreme Court’s decision in Good v. Uber , which upheld an identical TOS formation process.
Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. To fully understand these conflicting views of the majority opinion, it is necessary to understand both the specific facts of the case and the history of the Supreme Court’s case law concerning the fair-use doctrine. Goldsmith , No. 21-869 (May 18, 2023).
On November 15, 2021, President Biden signed the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act into law, authorizing $1.2 The bills, which largely focus on critical infrastructure, appear to be coalescing around three key concepts: Expanding the Role of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (“CISA”).
New York City is one of the first jurisdictions to pass a law aimed at reducing bias in automated employment decisions, which becomes effective on January 1, 2023. Similar laws are likely to be enacted in other jurisdictions. leverage predictive algorithms to support hiring. What Does the AEDT Require?
To produce this report Legatics conducted virtual and in-person workshops with over 100 lawyers and held 60 one-to-one interviews with partners and senior stakeholders from 6 participating law firms: overall project partners Herbert Smith Freehills and DLA Piper, together with Pinsent Masons, Reed Smith LLP, Osborne Clarke and Eversheds Sutherland.
By Rick Clark The Masters Conference for Legal Professionals in New York City hosted by Morgan Lewis LLP on July 24th was replete with insights on applying AI to eDiscovery, collecting and reviewing text and chat app data and information governance. This approach helps to tell the whole story while saving time and reducing costs.
Many state legislatures draft Internet regulations without any genuine concern for whether or not the laws violate the First Amendment. As a result, state legislatures, both red and blue, are producing a flood of Internet censorship laws will tie up the courts for years. The CDA essentially required websites to authenticate user age.
” I don’t know what “particular” third-party content means, but the statute doesn’t support any distinction based on “particular” and “non-particular” third-party content. .”
On its face, the law targets non-consensual intimate imagery, including synthetic content. Keep in mind, the law was passed under an administration that has shown little regard for civil liberties or dissenting speech. President Trump signed the TAKE IT DOWN Act into law in May.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content