This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This often involves artificial intelligence (AI) , data mining, machinelearning, and other technologies. Beyond the legal profession, predictive analytics is used in manufacturing, healthcare, insurance, marketing, and numerous other industries. How does predictive analytics differ from traditional legal analysis and strategy?
If ever there was an industry ripe for disruption, legal tech, and specifically legalresearch, is it. caselaw and helps us avoid issues others have run into in trying to use AI for legalresearch. solves a few problems that current legal search engines do not. What makes you unique or innovative?
This is a serious ethical violation and can lead to disciplinary action or legal consequences. Common examples include: Billing for the same task in different matters: Charging a client separately for the same legalresearch or document preparation in multiple cases.
This is a serious ethical violation and can lead to disciplinary action or legal consequences. Common examples include: Billing for the same task in different matters: Charging a client separately for the same legalresearch or document preparation in multiple cases.
How we’re unique: Starting from basic marketplace, Amazon+Uber for lawyers, approach, AppearMe is implementing machinelearning to automate routine legal work, minimize errors and missed deadlines by targeting the $65B litigation support market and offering free case management tools (a $1.1B Outside funding: Less than $1M.
If ever there was an industry ripe for disruption, legal tech, and specifically legalresearch, is it. caselaw and helps us avoid issues others have run into in trying to use AI for legalresearch. solves a few problems that current legal search engines do not. What makes you unique or innovative?
Because if it weren’t, if it were, say 90% with a machinelearning model, you wouldn’t trust this number. This is when we acquired judicata, we acquired a tiger already who was the CEO of judicata came over. And his precision rates on what you see right here is 99.6%. Precise, humans are about 96%. This is 99.6.
How we’re unique: Starting from basic marketplace, Amazon+Uber for lawyers, approach, AppearMe is implementing machinelearning to automate routine legal work, minimize errors and missed deadlines by targeting the $65B litigation support market and offering free case management tools (a $1.1B Outside funding: Less than $1M.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content