This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This allows them to better assert their rights and protect their interests if they end up in litigation. The main type of remedy is damages, which is money that the court orders a defendant to pay to the plaintiff as compensation for what the defendant did wrong. What Can You Ask a Court To Do? Whats a Statute of Limitations?
The defendant, Kalita Mukul Creative, ran community-focused newsletters. The defendant published a bio on Sewell and included one of McDermott’s photos–apparently sourced from an unrelated Instagram account (possibly another infringer, or perhaps that account has a fair use defense?). Defendant’s financial benefit.
informally called the “Yelp Law” (as in, it protected consumers’ rights to post reviews on Yelp). That’s a litigation strategy, I guess. 25, 2024) The post Amazon Must Defend “Yelp Law” Claim–Ramos v. My primer on that law. California enacted a similar law, Civil Code 1670.8,
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectual property rights. 1] Proving Defendants Use of Training Data Inputs.
Toyota brought a SAD Scheme case against 103 defendants before Judge Daniel in the Northern District of Illinois. If these justifications sound familiar, it’s because these are the generic rotely-made defendant-unspecific allegations that are copied and pasted into most SAD Scheme complaints. Seriously, Toyota? Do better).
Ai.law , a legal technology startup that uses artificial intelligence to generate litigation documents, has added a new module that will draft the complaint to initiate a lawsuit. Generating A Complaint To draft a complaint, you fill out a form with specific information about the case. Any issues likely to be contentious.
In the lawsuit I’m covering today, Roblox named over 250 defendants. If that’s true with the other 18 cases, Roblox may have sued 4,000+ defendants using the SAD Scheme. Hierl was the lead counsel on the Emojico case I opined on in 2021.] * * * Jurisdiction The defendant Bigfinz sells t-shirts. Seriously, Roblox?
A user can search for a specific case by providing information such as a party name, the date, and the court. Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure , a court may grant summary judgment to a litigant when “there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact, and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
By Neil Amato The deadline for most reporting companies to file beneficial ownership information (BOI) reports was extended to Jan. ” The case is still being litigated. 13, 2025, by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), hours after a Monday court ruling reinstated the reporting requirement. Garland , No.
” Doxing The relevant statute applies when a defendant intentionally published the plaintiff’s personally identifiable information without the consent of the person whose information is published.” But D’Ambrosio does not allege that any such information was ever posted in the group.”
The Consumer Protection Law Center offers information about these topics and others related to consumer rights. This allows a large number of consumers who have suffered the same type of harm caused by the same defendant to pursue their claims as a group. Either arbitration or mediation may be faster and less expensive than litigation.
The plaintiff sued 163 defendants for online marketplace sales and got an ex parte TRO, including Amazon account freezes. After a couple of defendants showed up, the judge denied a TRO extension because of the possible lack of merit in the plaintiff’s infringement allegations. Then, the case fell apart. See ECF No.
Today brings news that Gavelytics , a seven-year-old litigation analytics company, is closing its doors effective tomorrow. We built things never before built and answered litigation-related questions never before answerable. The idea struck me, What if, in advance, I could know detailed information about the judge?”
The journalists did not assert straightforward copyright infringement claims: they instead argued that OpenAI had removed copyright management information (“CMI”) before using their works to train ChatGPT, in violation of the DMCA. See 17 U.S.C. See, e.g. , Kirk Kara Corp. Western Stone and Metal Corp.,
Moritz College of Law The copyright – contract tension Stewart Brand famously said that information wants to be free. We know, however, that many laws limit free access and use of information goods, most prominently copyright law (and IP law generally). Guy Rub , The Ohio State University Michael E.
Defendants denied the allegations and stated that to the extent any copying of copyrighted works occurred, that copying constituted fair use. [2] Please contact us at dataportal@debevoise.com for more information. [1] Defendants Answer to First Consolidated Amended Complaint, (N.D. OpenAI, Inc. cases since last February). [1]
The summaries listed below are based on information provided by the startups in their applications. In some cases as noted, startups have not provided information or have asked that information be kept confidential. VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery.
While it is common to hear about large corporate defendants being sanctioned in huge products liability cases for not properly disclosing information, an individual plaintiff being sanctioned for the same offense is far less common. She is a sophisticated plaintiff, and she is a representative plaintiff in this litigation.
and aims to integrate with the Information Governance Reference Model (IGRM) and address the increasingly blurred lines between governance, discovery, and compliance. He warned that if data isnt proactively remediated before a litigation event, it will inevitably become part of discovery, leading to exponential costs and risks.
Emojico has trademark registrations in the word “emoji” for a ridiculously broad range of product categories–from (I’m not making this up) ship hulls to penis enlargers–and it then licenses the word to product manufacturers and defendants ensnared in its enforcement net. One defendant fought back.
Three proposed billsthePREVAIL Act, RESTORE Act, and PERA (Patent Eligibility Restoration Act)aim to fix longstanding issues in patent law, making iteasier for inventors to obtain patents, defend them in court, and monetize their innovations. Want to see these changes happen?
The problem is that the date you establish with your provisional application only applies to the information you filed in your provisional patent application. Consult a patent lawyer to discuss enforcement options, which may include sending a cease-and-desist letter or pursuing litigation. Why should I work with a patent lawyer?
Defendants could have more success on the first fair use factor, purpose and character, in the context of a generative AI model. Generative AI defendants have argued that their models have very different characters and purposes than the data on which theyre trained. Please contact us at dataportal@debevoise.com for more information.
” [FN: the factors are: (1) “the nature of the act assisted,” (2) the “amount of assistance” provided, (3) whether the defendant was “present at the time” of the principal tort, (4) the defendant’s “relation to the tortious actor,” (5) the “defendant’s state of mind,” and (6) the “duration of the assistance” given.
The pace of litigation is dizzying. To be integrated into a series of interrelated data sets, this information needed to be cleaned, wrangled into standardized formats that a computer could read. Judicial analytics can also provide information about grant rates for different types of motions. But things are starting to change.
” (Technically, the defendants in this case are enumerated on “Exhibit 1” instead of “Schedule A,” but same thing). Plaintiffs allege hundreds of defendants are infringing their trademarks and selling counterfeit goods. For a fuller description of the litigation genre and its problems, see my paper.
Erica Bristol hosts a fun & informative discussion about Intellectual Property with the @CLA_IP ’s Heather Antoine. CLA 2019 Annual Meeting: Litigation Section–CLE Highlights and Section Updates. The Litigation Section hosts their own podcast featuring a discussion about how to connect and build trust with your jury.
After two trips to the 9th Circuit, a remand from the Supreme Court, and nearly six years of motions and posturing, the outcome of the litigation was a permanent injunction against hiQ, a win for LinkedIn, and insolvency for scraper hiQ Labs. That said, few scraping-related cases pursue these issues past the first few stages of litigation.
By leveraging AI and other technologies, law firms can uncover patterns and trends across vast datasetsturning raw information into actionable insight. Predictive analytics can also guide whether to settle or proceed to court on a file based on analysis of past settlements, litigation costs, and opposing counsels behavior.
Upon investigation, the attorneys and law firms admitted that the citations were AI-generated hallucinationsfalse information produced by AIresulting in the court imposing disciplinary actions on all of the attorneys involved. AI hallucinations occur when an AI model generates information that appears credible but is entirely fictitious.
They supplemented that review with an analysis of court approaches to virtual hearings, e-filing, and digital notarization, focusing on how these tools affected litigants in three of the most common types of civil cases: debt claims, evictions and child support. Disproportionate Impact.
I can’t easily track the state court litigation, but the federal litigation is a sight to behold. Had the omitted information been disclosed, the injuries that Plaintiff suffered would have been avoidable and avoided. However, life intervened, and my massive blog post got stuck in draft mode. 4:22-md-03047-YGR (N.D.
Professor Farley and I propose a trademark fair use defense that would apply to any informational or expressive use of language or designs claimed by another as a mark in connection with any goods or services. Thus, it is easier for the defendant to win on a motion to dismiss under this test. A consumer survey is not required.
Understanding Litigation Finance Litigation finance is when a third-party invests in a lawsuit in hopes of sharing in the profits of a successful verdict. litigation finance companies exist. billion in capital to litigation matters. billion in capital to litigation matters.
Allowing employees to use generative AI (“GenAI”) comes with significant risks—such as the loss of confidentiality over sensitive firm and client information, mistakes occurring in important documents or decisions, loss of critical skills, and potential violations of contractual obligations and regulatory requirements. & Exch.
Are you using a generic electronically stored information (ESI) protocol without giving it much thought? It is crucial for litigators to carefully consider the terms of an ESI protocol when drafting and before agreeing to it. In StubHub , the parties agreed to produce hyperlinked documents as attachments in the ESI protocol.
The Reality of Construction Disputes in the UAE In the UAEs complex and rapidly evolving construction landscape, disputes often begin with seemingly minor issuesdelays, change orders, or payment disagreementsbut can escalate into high-stakes, multi-party litigation. For more information, visi t lineal.com The result?
The district court dismissed the contributory claim because the defendants didn’t materially contribute to the infringement. The court says the defendants waived any fair use defense by briefing it inadequately. For unexplained reasons, it does not appear that the defendants are invoking the 512 defense. Following Mr.
This switcheroo doesn’t answer the question on the table, because the 512(c) defense requires the defendant to BOTH not have the requisite supervisory ability AND not have a direct financial interest in the infringements. That’s true, but what about disclosures mandated in the INFORM Consumers Act?
The City was found to be grossly negligent in issuing and executing its litigation hold for the preservation of email and text messages. The City did not issue a litigation hold until three years AFTER the complaint had been filed. The Court found that the City’s litigation hold was both late and ineffective. 2, 2016) 2016 U.S.
The legal proceedings can be broadly categorised into civil and criminal litigation, each governed by distinct laws and procedures. This blog highlights the key differences between civil and criminal litigation according to the law. Discovery is the process by which parties exchange information and evidence.
After all, the plan to send an unrepresented litigant into court wearing AirPods through which the litigant would receive instructions on what to say almost certainly would have violated court rules. Most courts ban electronic devices in courtrooms, and it would have been hard to overlook a litigant wearing AirPods. “That.
Are you a busy litigator constantly on the move? If you choose not to, you will have to inform the courts in a statement that you do not want to give a country of removal. You will need to include a change of address/contact information form. Let us show you around book a demo today ! List of applications and forms.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content