This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The main type of remedy is damages, which is money that the court orders a defendant to pay to the plaintiff as compensation for what the defendant did wrong. This is an order that tells the defendant to do or not do something. When Can a Federal Court Hear a Case? Otherwise, a state court will hear the case.
This means your law firms website needs to be accessible to people with vision, hearing, mobility, and cognitive impairments. Provide captions for videos and transcripts for audio content to support users who are deaf or hard of hearing. Proactive compliance is far less costly than defending a lawsuit.
Eventually, they probably will need to go to a court hearing on the issue. How Can You Defend Against a Foreclosure? This warrants accelerating the process to prevent any harm to the property that would reduce its value. If the homeowner has not abandoned the home, they can respond to the lender’s motion.
Khalilian , defense moved to exclude a voice recording ostensibly showing the defendant making threats on the grounds that it could be deepfaked. In a colloquy with the court, the prosecution argued that a witness familiar with the defendant’s voice could listen to the audio and affirm that it sounds like the defendant.
Toyota brought a SAD Scheme case against 103 defendants before Judge Daniel in the Northern District of Illinois. If these justifications sound familiar, it’s because these are the generic rotely-made defendant-unspecific allegations that are copied and pasted into most SAD Scheme complaints. Seriously, Toyota? Do better).
Generative AI has transformed how people around the world work; how they create; and what they see, hear, and watch online. Although plaintiffs have been dealt some setbacks, they have responded by bringing new legal claims against a broader class of defendants, making clear that there is no end in sight to these disputes.
Brett Trout When people hear the word patent, they often assume its a uniform stamp of protectionsomething rigid, standardized, and identical no matter who files it. But heres the truth that savvy inventors and business owners come to learn: not all patents are created equal.
Lack of Access Courts have consistently held that posting works on the Internet, without more, doesn’t ensure that the defendant had “access” to them for purposes of copying-in-fact. Third, the court is correct that a blog post without any promotion can be the tree that falls in the forest that no one hears.
Attending a motion hearing: A hearing is scheduled for both you and the opposing party to argue your case before the judge. Finally, you will represent your client at a hearing and address any objections or opposition to the motion. You will then file the motion with the court and Homeland Security.
This includes survivors, witnesses, criminal defendants, and convicts. If youd like to hear from cutting-edge speakers on the movement toward trauma-informed justice and other relevant topics in the legal industry, be sure to register for ClioCon 2025. In other words, what are the advantages of a trauma-informed justice system?
The court enjoins Next Level pending a PI hearing on March 3. * * * The DMCA notice-and-takedown scheme was never intended to provide final resolution to copyright owners. The TRO language doesn’t purport to apply to YouTube, nor could it unless YouTube had also been named a defendant.
District Judge Trina Thompson issued a temporary restraining order barring the defendants from using the name “IO” to market their new AI device—at least for the time being. Judge Thompson agreed that the risk of confusion was real enough to justify a temporary restraining order, which will stay in place until a full hearing in October.
The defendant displayed its own trademark in the ad copy, not the plaintiff’s, so the marks were dissimilar. ” Ugh, seriously, nooooo… Keyword metatags are the trees that fall in the forest that no one hears. Mark Similarity. ” PREACH. They should be legally irrelevant.
However, a court would almost never independently spot the standing problem at an ex parte TRO hearing. Schedule A Defendants Judge Rejects SAD Scheme JoinderToyota v. Schedule A Defendants Another Judge Balks at SAD Scheme JoinderXie v. Schedule A Defendants Judge Hammers SEC for Lying to Get an Ex Parte TROSEC v.
The Court does not reach such conclusion lightly or hastily; indeed, it has given Defendants ample opportunity to rectify or explain their actions. None of their responses has been satisfactory, the judge wrote.
Snap * The Ninth Circuits FOSTA Jurisprudence Is Getting Clearer (and More Defense-Favorable) * Defendants Get Important FOSTA Win in 9th CircuitDoe v. US * New Civil FOSTA Lawsuits Push Expansive Legal Theories Against Unexpected Defendants (Guest Blog Post) * Section 230 Helps Salesforce Defeat Sex Trafficking LawsuitDoe v.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the TikTok ban, and Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Free Speech Coalition v. The early rounds have not gone well for the defendants in many cases. 9) Supreme Court Tamps Down on Jawboning and Government Social Media Lawsuits. Paxton regarding mandatory age authentication.
When an important hearing or filing due date changes, staff must adjust multiple related tasks by hand. To help you visualize this better, imagine that you have a Review client file task due March 10, and youve set another task, Identify defendants, thats meant to start one day after the review is completed.
When an important hearing or filing due date changes, staff must adjust multiple related tasks by hand. To help you visualize this better, imagine that you have a Review client file task due March 10, and youve set another task, Identify defendants, thats meant to start one day after the review is completed.
The focus on regulation has expanded beyond the president, with the House Judiciary Subcommittee on the Administrative State, Regulatory Reform, and Antitrust holding a hearing called “Reining in the Administrative State: Regulatory and Administrative Law Reform,” in mid-February 2025. These political movements come as the U.S.
This decision largely rejects the defendants’ motion to dismiss, which will induce more plaintiff lawyers to bring more cases. As we know, Generative AI has a bias towards telling the engagers what they want to hear, so this type of “encouragement” is currently inherent in Generative AI models).
Snap * The Ninth Circuit’s FOSTA Jurisprudence Is Getting Clearer (and More Defense-Favorable) * Defendants Get Important FOSTA Win in 9th Circuit–Doe v. US * New Civil FOSTA Lawsuits Push Expansive Legal Theories Against Unexpected Defendants (Guest Blog Post) * Section 230 Helps Salesforce Defeat Sex Trafficking Lawsuit–Doe v.
.” The standing order gives some examples of those “bizarre” deviations: requested exceptions to the Hague convention’s service and translation services (including email service) that are “almost never even made in other cases against foreign defendants.” ” ex parte TROs.
Accordingly, the defendant, Judge Dugan, is entitled to a preliminary hearing in 20 days to determine if there is sufficient probable cause to support the charges. You will hear and read hours of reporting based on those paragraphs. The complaint was signed by Stephen C. Dries, United States Magistrate Judge. Read more…
MG Freesites because the defendant in that case hosted the video and allegedly exercised other content moderation steps around it. FOSTA The plaintiff invoked the FOSTA exception to Section 230, which required the court to decide if plaintiffs to show the defendant had the higher scienter required by 1591 or the lower scienter of 1595.
MySpace from 2008 , the plaintiff made the now-standard modern argument that the Grindr’s lack of age authentication “is a design defect and Defendant Grindr had a duty to take steps to keep children from accessing this app” (citing Doe v. To get around Section 230’s obvious application dating back to cases like Doe v.
An allegation that “a defendant filed false Amazon counterfeit reports” is sufficient to state a claim. This is true even if the defendants made its associated fact claims to Amazon “under penalty of perjury.” ” Um, no. .” ” Um, no.
We need to hear Roblox’s side of this story before we can make any further inferences. Schedule A Defendants If TOS Formation Fails, Bad Legal Outcomes Are Likely to Follow–Doe v. Roblox The post Roblox Must Defend Illegal Gambling Claims–Colvin v. The complaint. The CourtListener page.
The plaintiff sued 163 defendants for online marketplace sales and got an ex parte TRO, including Amazon account freezes. After a couple of defendants showed up, the judge denied a TRO extension because of the possible lack of merit in the plaintiff’s infringement allegations. Then, the case fell apart. See ECF No.
“Plaintiff alleges Defendants downloaded and copied Plaintiff’s copyrighted materials from YouTube, and then re-uploaded infringing versions of Plaintiff’s copyrighted media content to their YouTube channels.” ” Viral DRM sued 20 defendants enumerated in a Schedule A and got an ex parte TRO. Jurisdiction.
Stability AI , three artists are pursuing infringement claims against the AI company Stability AI and other defendants in the U.S. Stability AI and the other defendants filed motions to dismiss the case, and the court has scheduled a hearing for this summer. In Andersen v. District Court for the Northern District of California.
By Jordan Valinsky , CNN New York CNN — 3M has agreed to pay $6 billion to resolve roughly 300,000 lawsuits alleging that the manufacturing company supplied faulty combat earplugs to the military that resulted in significant injuries, such as hearing loss. The products at issue in this litigation are safe and effective when used properly.
Obsidian Dynamics Transcript of Discovery Hearing Before Honorable Judith Hand, Magistrate Judge Appearances : On behalf of Plaintiff Genesis Technology Sarah Lovington Savath, Saine and Soore, LLP On behalf of Defendant Obsidian Dynamics Jeremy Putkin Mirkland and Mellis, LLP — The Court : Ms. Lovington : Of course, Your Honor.
JAG Lawyer A Judge Advocate General is a unique opportunity for those who want to defend their country in court. These individuals will have the opportunity to take on significant responsibility, further their education in various legal specialties, and gain experience working around the world to uphold justice for those who defend it.
The Illinois Supreme Court has officially found that operational challenges in Illinois circuit courts will necessitate remote pretrial hearings to comply with the pretrial release provisions of the SAFE-T Act, according to an Order issued in late August. Read the order here.
While it is common to hear about large corporate defendants being sanctioned in huge products liability cases for not properly disclosing information, an individual plaintiff being sanctioned for the same offense is far less common. The post Discovery Sanctions…not just for Defendants appeared first on Liquid Litigation Management.
The current national standards for public defender caseloads, set in 1973, are “ outdated, not empirically based, and inadequate ” and should be updated for public defenders to adequately represent indigent clients, according to findings from a recent study. that encompass the work of public defenders. Constitution.
The SAD Scheme involves a trademark owner suing dozens/hundreds of defendants using a sealed complaint, getting an ex parte TRO, and then having the online marketplaces freeze the defendants’ accounts and money. Schedule A Defendants Why Online Marketplaces Don’t Do More to Combat the SAD Scheme–Squishmallows v.
It used to be a major strategic consideration whether to use TrialDirector and risk appearing as though you were spending too much money, or had very deep pockets as a defendant. Technology, when used properly, can make you more effective and efficient in trial. So back to our question. The short and simple answer is yes and no.
JusticeText , a three-year-old startup that makes it easier for public defenders in criminal cases to review body cam and other video footage, has raised a seed round of $2.2 They discovered that the explosion in the quantity of body cam footage and video evidence was overwhelming public defenders and worsening backlogs in criminal cases.
Obsidian Dynamics Transcript of Discovery Hearing Before Honorable Judith Hand, Magistrate Judge Appearances : On behalf of Plaintiff Genesis Technology Sarah Lovington Savath, Saine and Soore, LLP On behalf of Defendant Obsidian Dynamics Jeremy Putkin Mirkland and Mellis, LLP — The Court : Ms. The Court : Yes, yes, Ms. performance.
Defending against hackers is not optional; it’s a requirement. It seems every day we hear about another cyber-attack data breach or company getting hacked. Cyber-attacks are becoming so common now that we’re starting to become desensitized to hearing about them. So let’s learn some basic defense techniques. So, what’s going on?
After hearing this allegation at least twice, the Court instructed plaintiffs’ counsel to go present proof of such a bribe and to specifically subpoena the banks that were allegedly involved in laundering the bribe. This is the basic reason that summary judgment, at long last, must be GRANTED to Meta defendants.
They supplemented that review with an analysis of court approaches to virtual hearings, e-filing, and digital notarization, focusing on how these tools affected litigants in three of the most common types of civil cases: debt claims, evictions and child support. million remote proceedings (civil and criminal) from March 2020 to February 2021.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content