Remove Defendant Remove Federal law Remove Time-tracking
article thumbnail

Justia Legal Resources: Foreclosure Law Center

Justia Legal Marketing & Technology blog

Only a relatively small number of states allow for an expedited (or fast-track) foreclosure. Some states extend this right for a certain time after the sale. Under federal law, a tenant generally can stay until the lease ends even if their landlord loses ownership of the property. How Can You Defend Against a Foreclosure?

Law 263
article thumbnail

Justia Legal Guides: Child Safety Center

Justia Legal Marketing & Technology blog

Most parents devote lots of time, energy, and expense to keeping their children as safe as possible. When this happens, parents could hold a defendant liable by proving that they were negligent. Online Safety Parents often have trouble keeping track of their children’s activities when they venture onto the internet.

Defendant 246
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Guest Post: David the Inventor vs. the Biglaw Goliath – What Drives A Goliath To Take On A David?

LawSites

At great cost, Xcential has been forced to defend itself with counterclaims and motions for dismissal. What’s particularly important about the invention is that it can automate some of the more complicated, time-consuming and error-prone steps for drafting a federal bill. million on federal lobbying with Akin Gump last year).

article thumbnail

Face Forward: Strategies for Complying with Facial Recognition Laws

Debevoise Data Blog

Marketing: In the retail context, facial recognition or “facial detection” technologies can scan shoppers for features such as age, gender, and mood—then deliver tailored advertisements in real time. Particularly scrutinized is the use of “real-time” facial recognition to scan crowds in public places, such as marches and protests.

Law 52
article thumbnail

A Takedown of the Take It Down Act

Eric Goldman

As discussed, the definition of intimate imagery covers non-sexually explicit content, which covers content that is likely broader than existing CSAM or obscenity laws. This means that the law creates a lower-tier criminal offense for visual content involving minors, even if the images are not illegal under current federal law.