This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Brett Trout In a significant decision for copyright law and legal technology, Judge Stephanos Bibas granted partial summary judgment in favor of Thomson Reuters, rejecting ROSS Intelligences fair use defense in a closely watched lawsuit over the use of Westlaws legal content.
The standard attendance was up from 600 to 800 this year, but with new found collaborations from additional organizations including the California Judges Association, there were 1,300 legal professionals gathered to participate in cross-over programming designed to benefit everyone involved. . CLAAnnualMeeting19 pic.twitter.com/famxE2jXs0.
In a ruling with potential implications for other pending generative artificial intelligence (AI) copyright cases, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH & West Publishing Corp. ROSS Intelligence Inc. some creative spark.
After many rounds of motions to dismiss, intellectualproperty cases against AI developers are moving into the discovery phase. Just weeks into 2025, we got our first answer, with a court ordering OpenAI to produce a complete training dataset to plaintiffs. What Happened?
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectualproperty rights.
Palmer Chief Counsel, Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism and Adjunct Professor Comment on his posts with your two cents on anything from incomprehensible law language to AI ethics in law to the power of youth mentorshipwe bet hell comment back. Engage on topics like legal blogging or networking and follow his starter pack.
I’m pleased to share a draft of a new paper, “ A SAD New Category of Abusive IntellectualProperty Litigation.” This paper explains the scheme, how it bypasses standard legal safeguards, how it’s affected hundreds of thousands of defendants, and how it may have cost the federal courts a quarter-billion dollars.
Why Litigation Experience Matters in a Patent Attorney One of the most overlooked but highly valuable assets in a patent attorney is litigation experience specifically, experience arguing patent cases in federal court. It could be the difference between owning IP that looks good on paper and IP that actually protects your market.
Developers of artificial intelligence (“AI”) systems notched a victory last week when a federal judge dismissed claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) premised on the use of copyrighted works in AI training data, holding that the plaintiffs had failed to show any concrete harm and therefore lacked standing to bring their claims.
Intellectualproperty law sparked her interest until she found it to be boring. “In I then dabbled in patents and trademarks and intellectualproperty law. Supreme Court. Immigration Courts and the Board of Immigration Appeals. . But it was too dry for me,” she says. “I She is admitted in all 58 U.S.
Or should courts apply the strict liability used for product defects? In the book, Abbott argues that laws should be AI neutral and that the acts of artificial intelligence should not be judged differently than humans’. If a human uses artificial intelligence to invent something, should the invention be patentable?
But this assertion is belied by the “Create-a-Star” feature and by evidence produced at trial establishing that Defendants previously altered tattoos of wrestlers to avoid infringing on others’ intellectualproperty.” Obviously the court was bothered by the Create-a-Star feature.
There are a number of litigation analytics products on the market, and what they all have in common is that they extract data from court dockets and apply analytics to provide insights into how judges rule in particular times of matters. That is useful information, because it provides insights into a judge’s propensities.
I’m pleased to share the final published version of my article, “ A SAD Scheme of Abusive IntellectualProperty Litigation.” Prior Blog Posts on the SAD Scheme In a SAD Scheme Case, Court Rejects Injunction Over “Emoji” Trademark Schedule A (SAD Scheme) Plaintiff Sanctioned for “Fraud on the Court”–Xped v.
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
This post covers an opinion where the court assumes such vertical integration based on the pleadings (it remains to be seen if that’s actually the case). The court says that Pixels could be “counterfeiting” the Canvasfish online store (?) That story is still being written. Trademark Infringement. ” UGH.
Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. While we are happy to lead an industry disruption, we welcome new competition, which we believe will help accelerate adoption of new AI-powered eDiscovery technologies by courts, law firms, and other stakeholders.
But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. It’s not that half of federal judges have adopted one clear stance on copyright preemption of contracts and the other half have adopted another clear stance. Three courts of appeals have answered “no.”
Massive Open Online Course on AI and the Rule of Law by UNESCO This free online course on AI and the rule of law, available in seven languages, features 20 speakers from around the world, including sitting judges from Supreme Courts and Human Right Courts, legal experts and technology experts.
Ana Juneja Platform: TikTok Why follow: Ana Juneja captivates her audience with engaging videos on intellectualproperty law , simplifying complex issues into easy-to-understand content. Judge Victoria Pratt will also be sharing her knowledge as a keynote speaker at the 2024 Clio Cloud Conference.
In a November ruling, a magistrate judge notes that the lawsuit appears to be the first of its kindone in which a social media influencer accuses another influencer of (among other things) copyright infringement based on the similarities between their posts that promote the same products. Sydney Nicole LLC v.
Litigators possess extensive experience in handling civil cases, such as personal injury claims , commercial disputes, and intellectualproperty matters. Their primary responsibility is to represent clients in litigation, which involves preparing and presenting cases before judges and juries.
Michael Sander , the founder of Docket Alarm , a product that mines federal and state court dockets to provide litigation alerts and case analytics, has left the company, seven months after its acquisition by legal research company vLex in April. ” Daniel Ivtsan vLex has named Daniel Ivtsan as the new head of product for Docket Alarm.
Copyrights safeguard your intellectualproperty , such as books, music, or artwork, from unauthorized use. Licensing Agreements Monetize your intellectualproperty and retain control over its usage through licensing agreements.
We celebrate Women’s History Month by acknowledging some remarkable female figures who have made significant contributions to the field of law: Sandra Day O’Connor (1930-2023): The first woman to serve on the Supreme Court, O’Connor paved the way for future generations of female jurists. a national law firm marketing agency.
For litigation lawyers, it can predict how a case might play out in court, which makes it easier to decide if its worth settling or going all the way. Its particularly useful for litigation teams looking to analyze case trends, predict outcomes, and gain insights into opposing counsel or judges. Not really.
In litigation and intellectualproperty matters, it is the responsibility of docketing professionals to ensure that electronic court pleadings and documents are properly and timely filed, to maintain internal databases of docketed documents, and to facilitate access to documents by the firm’s legal professionals.
Developing friendships with attorneys, judges, and legal vendors through your state and local bar associations can be a productive way to have your own silent sales force, ready to send qualified candidates your way. Take advantage of complimentary our “ Courting Your Clients ” e-book to help create your own law firm marketing plan.
Michael Sander , the founder of Docket Alarm , a product that mines federal and state court dockets to provide litigation alerts and case analytics, has left the company, seven months after its acquisition by legal research company vLex in April. Daniel Ivtsan vLex has named Daniel Ivtsan as the new head of product for Docket Alarm.
As a result, courts have recognized three types of liability for copyright infringement: direct infringement (“to do” any one of the five exclusive rights), contributory infringement (“to authorize” another to directly infringe) and vicarious liability (based on the relationship between the direct infringer and the person sought to be held liable).
Legal experts might say the movie has an intellectualproperty issue. The film portrays the difficulty of being a district attorney and judge in a high-profile case. The movie explores the boundaries between belief and evidence in a court of law. He broke in and stole all the Christmas gifts.
And that’s one thing, providing it a change control clause, which is proprietary, valuable intellectualproperty for that organization. But when you’ve got a decentralized process, like common law, where you’ve got a circuit court in the foothills of Wisconsin with one judge and one local solicitor.
The investigations come just one month after a class action was filed in the English High Court against YouTube for allegedly processing children’s data without obtaining parental permission or providing appropriate disclosures (see our September Round Up ).
Despite initial restrictions, like those imposed by US District Courtjudges and law schools like Berkeley and the University of Michigan, legal tech evangelist Nicole Black argues that these technologies should be embraced as valuable tools to streamline work and increase efficiencies. is from the 9th Circuit Court, 'Johnson v.
In past years, the judges narrowed the ballot to 25 semifinalists. This year, out of the 55 applications we received, the judges felt that so many deserved the opportunity to compete that we eliminated only 15 and we are putting the rest out for your votes. You may vote for your top-five favorites or five times for top favorite.
It even wrote me a funny Limerick about the Supreme Court: “ There once were nine judges supreme whose robes were a legal dream. We’ll explore the potential impacts of ChatGPT not only on everyday life, but also on the legal industry, education, intellectualproperty law, geopolitics, and more. You know, did?
And that’s one thing, providing it a change control clause, which is proprietary, valuable intellectualproperty for that organization. But when you’ve got a decentralized process, like common law, where you’ve got a circuit court in the foothills of Wisconsin with one judge and one local solicitor.
Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. While we are happy to lead an industry disruption, we welcome new competition, which we believe will help accelerate adoption of new AI-powered eDiscovery technologies by courts, law firms, and other stakeholders.
Here are some ideas: Groups Based on Personas Drawn from Real People • Getting reactions on an arbitration with a panel of three arbitrators where you have sufficient biographical information to create reasonably helpful personas • Similarly, getting quick reactions to legal arguments on an appeal to a multi-judge panel.
The court opinion includes a screengrab of the tweet (see page 3). This extraordinary assertion, with which Shakespeare, Tolstoy and Faulkner might take issue, [FN] frankly causes this court to wonder whether it is dealing with a litigant whose feet are firmly planted on the ground.
Here are some ideas: Groups Based on Personas Drawn from Real People • Getting reactions on an arbitration with a panel of three arbitrators where you have sufficient biographical information to create reasonably helpful personas • Similarly, getting quick reactions to legal arguments on an appeal to a multi-judge panel.
Ochoa’s definitive analysis of the Supreme Court’s Warhol opinion. Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit’s ruling that the reproduction of Andy Warhol’s Orange Prince on the cover of a magazine tribute was not a fair use of Lynn Goldsmith’s photo of the singer-songwriter Prince, on which the Warhol portrait was based.
The court says that using scraped data after receiving a cease-and-desist notice is not a violation of the CFAA, even if the data was collected from beneath a log-in from a site that prohibits scraping. That’s a reasonable inference from Van Buren , but no court has explicitly said as much before. The terms prohibited scraping.
Companies such as Apple have already expressed their displeasure, stating that the regulations will lead to unnecessary privacy and security vulnerabilities for its users and prevent the company from charging for the intellectualproperty. And it’s going to be checked by the European Court of Justice.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content