This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. What Can You Ask a Court To Do? What you want the court to do is usually called a remedy. This is an order that tells the defendant to do or not do something.
The defendant, Kalita Mukul Creative, ran community-focused newsletters. The defendant published a bio on Sewell and included one of McDermott’s photos–apparently sourced from an unrelated Instagram account (possibly another infringer, or perhaps that account has a fair use defense?). Defendant’s financial benefit.
According to Pandabuy’s website, “All the searched products are from third party platforms, Pandabuy only provides information search, agent shopping and shipping services. Pandabuy initially no-showed in the case, so the court converted the TRO to a preliminary injunction. The court distinguishes Atari v.
While AI promises efficiency and cost savings, a recent case in the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming serves as a stark reminder of the dangers of including unverified AI-generated content in court filings. The court discovered that eight of those cases did not exist. Walmart Inc. &
” (Plus, the court notes that while he’s in prison, his job prospects are limited). ” Doxing The relevant statute applies when a defendant intentionally published the plaintiff’s personally identifiable information without the consent of the person whose information is published.”
Toyota brought a SAD Scheme case against 103 defendants before Judge Daniel in the Northern District of Illinois. If these justifications sound familiar, it’s because these are the generic rotely-made defendant-unspecific allegations that are copied and pasted into most SAD Scheme complaints. .” Seriously, Toyota?
As for the legal briefing on your own cases, book a demo with Clio to see how our practice management solution can help you keep case information and documents organized and boost your productivity. Unlike legal briefs , case briefs are not submitted to the court or opposing counsel. What is a case brief?
Shopify said California courts lack personal jurisdiction over it. The district court agreed with Shopify, as did a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit. The en banc court issues a total of four opinions, and collectively they show Shopify was never close. Briskin sued Shopify for a variety of privacy violations in California.
In a ruling with potential implications for other pending generative artificial intelligence (AI) copyright cases, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH & West Publishing Corp. ROSS Intelligence Inc. some creative spark.
This includes survivors, witnesses, criminal defendants, and convicts. In other words, what are the advantages of a trauma-informed justice system? Here, we explore what we mean by a trauma-informed justice system and its potential benefits. What is a trauma-informed justice system?
The defendant invoked the arbitration clause in its TOS. Extensively citing Chabolla , the court rejects the arbitration request. The court says Plex’s relationship context cuts against TOS formation. The court’s treatment of the sign-up screen’s call-to-action is perplexing (no pun intended).
To dispose of various motions, the court must construe the statutory term “social media platform.” ” Florida’s statutory definition: Social media platform means any information service, system, Internet search engine, or access software provider that: 1. This is the post-SCOTUS remand of Moody v.
The court summarizes the case: Rodney Woodland, a freelance artist and model, posts semi-naked photographs of himself in different poses on Instagram. The court displayed all of the photos side-by-side, so of course we’re going to look at them. I guess that makes me old-school. So I think this is a SFW post.
The court summarizes the plaintiffs’ allegations: D.G. Seeking redress, Plaintiffs sued Defendants on the theory that their design decisions and failure to disclose the dangers of their products were the cause of D.G.s The court dismisses Roblox, Google, and Apple from the case. Plaintiffs further allege that D.G.s
As we previewed in our 2024 AI year in review , one of the big areas to watch in 2025 will be how much discovery courts are prepared to order into the inner workings of AI companies, especially in the face of arguments that discovery would reveal trade secrets or would be overbroad in cases based on specific claimed works. OpenAI, Inc.
The problem is that the date you establish with your provisional application only applies to the information you filed in your provisional patent application. Produce a patent that will stand up in court. Draft an application that will support those claims and stand up in court. What happens after I receive a patent?
A look back at 2024 shows that plaintiffs are learning from the initial wave of cases filed against AI developers, and that plaintiffs are now adapting their claimsas well as the defendants they are suingto meet the shifting legal terrain. 1] Proving Defendants Use of Training Data Inputs. Meeting the DMCAs Statutory Requirements.
It creates a legal mechanism to block access to entire websiteson the mere allegation of copyright infringementwithout giving those websites a meaningful chance to defend themselves. Worse, the process is often ex parte, meaning the accused website operator isnt even present to defend themselves. Who Watches the Watchmen?
Prepare for Litigation Draft contracts that account for AI-generated trade secrets Work with counsel to ensure NDAs and IP clauses hold up in court If a breach happens, move fast—evidence disappears quickly 5. laws, like the Defend Trade Secrets Act, offer some protection. Brett Trout What is a Trade Secret?
Three proposed billsthePREVAIL Act, RESTORE Act, and PERA (Patent Eligibility Restoration Act)aim to fix longstanding issues in patent law, making iteasier for inventors to obtain patents, defend them in court, and monetize their innovations. This law would give inventors a real weapon against infringers? Aligning the U.S.
The journalists did not assert straightforward copyright infringement claims: they instead argued that OpenAI had removed copyright management information (“CMI”) before using their works to train ChatGPT, in violation of the DMCA. Some courts considering Section 1202 claims have also required that the work at issue be reproduced exactly.
At this point, I’ve not paid close attention to the proceedings because everything at the district court level is a rehearsal for the inevitable appellate court review. I’m sure the appellate court will be eager to docket this one. A reminder: this lawsuit is a battle royale. They will need to clear their calendar.
By Neil Amato The deadline for most reporting companies to file beneficial ownership information (BOI) reports was extended to Jan. 13, 2025, by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), hours after a Monday court ruling reinstated the reporting requirement. 1, 2025, BOI reporting deadline pending a further order of the court.
informally called the “Yelp Law” (as in, it protected consumers’ rights to post reviews on Yelp). At this point, the plaintiffs are arguing that their claims belong in state court because their allegations are too weak to support Article III standing for federal court. My primer on that law.
The plaintiffs claim that purchasing the defendant’s initial loss leader offering caused the plaintiffs to subscribe to a hidden monthly recurring charge. Invoking the arbitration clause in the TOS, the defendant sought to send the lawsuit to arbitration. The 2024 district court opinion. I don’t agree with this.
By leveraging AI and other technologies, law firms can uncover patterns and trends across vast datasetsturning raw information into actionable insight. These predictions are based on analysis of large datasets, often including judicial decisions, court filings, case law, and other legal data. The result?
Though Microsoft is the named defendant in the case, the real players here are the New York Times and OpenAI. In April, the court ruled on Microsoft and OpenAI’s motions to dismiss. The court agreed. The court said that it was premature to decide on that question yet. Universal City Studios, Inc., 417, 442, 104 S.Ct.
A motion for a change of venue is a legal request where a case is transferred from one court jurisdiction to another to ensure a fair trial and avoid bias or undue influence. Improper venue : If your case was initially filed in a jurisdiction lacking proper legal authority or was filed to the wrong court, it could be transferred.
Preserving Client Confidentiality at All Costs Conflict checks act as a safeguard, preventing accidental misuse of privileged information across cases, protecting both client trust and the firm from breaches of attorney-client privilege.
Build a Barrier to Imitators Registering your trademark puts competitors and counterfeiters on notice that your brand is legally protected, and that you are prepared to defend it. Having the knowledge of what it takes to win a trademark infringement lawsuit helps inform the best practices on the registration side.
Traditional eDiscovery tools, optimized for emails and PDFs, are ill-equipped to handle the breadth and unstructured nature of this information. With AI-powered correlation tools, automated timeline reconstruction, and defensible review protocols, Lineal helps legal teams transform raw project data into coherent, court-ready narratives.
But the rise in dupes has brought a corresponding rise in dupe lawsuits, or at least lawsuits that offer up defendants’ or consumers’ use of the term “dupe” as evidence of confusing similarity or intent to deceive. [Eric’s note: for a discussion about these physical-space adjacencies, see this paper.]
It claims that 7News Australia downloaded videos from YouTube, stripped out the copyright management information (CMI), and incorporated the videos into its own videos that it uploaded to YouTube. The court says that Viral DRM doesn’t have standing to enforce the copyright. Seven West Media Ltd., 2025 WL 660250 (N.D.
Weve written extensively on how lawyers can use AI responsibly and, as yet another court decision is released addressing lawyers use of AI, its never been more important to understand the risks and limitations of AI use. How did the court respond to the hallucinations? Learn how it works. What are AI hallucinations?
The court is unclear about how Joybuy operates, but it appears that Joybuy (via the entity JD) runs its own online marketplace. The court says that Joybuy sufficiently established that it ran its own online marketplace and thus qualified as a service provider.
Thats the basis for a recent opinion from a Florida federal district court that could have major implications for online services CSAM detection and reporting practices. Now, however, a district court decision suggests that providers can no longer take it for granted that they wont face liability for reporting non-CSAM.
This practice makes it easy for critical information to be misplaced or even compromised, opening up your firm to errors, inconsistencies, and patchy data analysis that can swiftly sour a matters turnout. But leveraging workflow software for law firms can answer this problem.
Electronic Frontier Foundation Lawsuit Argues Defendants Violated the Privacy Act by Disclosing Sensitive Data NEW YORKEFF and a coalition of privacy defenders led by Lex Lumina filed a lawsuit today asking a federal court to stop the U.S.
On the day before the law’s effectiveness, the district court enjoins parts of the law but says that other parts may be constitutional. The court subsequently enjoined all upheld provisions until February 1 to see if the Ninth Circuit will extend the injunction pending its review. The court says that’s not so.
Considering the training provided to HHS students regarding the importance of citing sources generally, Defendants could conclude that RNH understood that it is dishonest to claim credit for work that is not your own. This turned into an expensive federal case that produced a 16k word opinion. ” Seriously?
Allowing employees to use generative AI (“GenAI”) comes with significant risks—such as the loss of confidentiality over sensitive firm and client information, mistakes occurring in important documents or decisions, loss of critical skills, and potential violations of contractual obligations and regulatory requirements. & Exch.
The Truck Accidents Legal Center at Justia provides this information, as well as practical safety tips. If a defendant engaged in serious wrongdoing, a victim might recover punitive damages as well. Here are some answers to basic questions that might arise. What Damages Can I Get for a Truck Accident?
In early 2024, the court granted a preliminary injunction against the law going into effect. Borrowing heavily from its prior opinion, the court has now granted the permanent injunction. Ohio enacted a segregate-and-suppress law that requires regulated websites to obtain parental consent before minors can access certain site features.
Supreme Court, with uncertain prospects, so this is probably not the final word on the matter–or possibly even an important one. This doesn’t sound right–when a law survive strict scrutiny, it’s likely the court didn’t actually apply the scrutiny as vigorously as it should.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content