This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Justis, powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4, was able to have a natural conversation with Greg and provide insightful perspectives on the use of generative AI in the legal industry, specifically in law firms. While many law firm leaders recognize its potential, some are unsure of how it fits into legal work or worry about risks.
Most recently, lawyers from Morgan & Morgan the largest personal injury law firm in the United Stateswere sanctioned for submitting court filings that contained cases hallucinated by artificial intelligence. The AI platform generated citationsbut, it turns out, they werent real cases. Learn how it works.
Unlike most of the CCB cases to date, this case involves Section 512(f), the DMCA cause of action for bogus takedown notices. Consistent with the CCB’s small claims court ethos, the case involved both a pro se claimant and respondent. Mitrakos, 22-CCB-0035 , February 15, 2023, and Oppenheimer v. Let’s take a look.
Also, lawyers can rely on the software to maintain accurate information at all times. Ensuring that legal professionals are always aware of upcoming deadlines, court appearances, and other critical events. It incorporates features like user access controls, encryption, and regular data backups to protect sensitive information.
The CCPA provides a cause of action to “[a]ny consumer whose nonencrypted and nonredacted personal information. Not surprisingly, in these early days of CCPA private actions, plaintiffs are trying to push the boundaries of the law and testing who, when, and why a CCPA claim may be brought. In Rahman v. Marriott Int’l, Inc.,
Motion practice shapes the case, and if you want to handle your cases more professionally, understanding motion practice is essential. Legal motions allow parties to assert their rights, and seek relief from the court regarding certain cases. This motion asks the court to dismiss the case.
In the realm of law, effective communication can be the difference between success and failure. Whether you’re a practicing attorney, a law student, or simply someone interested in the art of persuasion, To understand the nuances of persuasive legal writing is essential. Cite relevant statutes, caselaw, and precedents.
Justis, powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4, was able to have a natural conversation with Greg and provide insightful perspectives on the use of generative AI in the legal industry, specifically in law firms. While many law firm leaders recognize its potential, some are unsure of how it fits into legal work or worry about risks.
Oracle software case. (See See my commentary on that case here.) For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. [Eric’s note: this is the post you’ve been waiting for: Prof. Goldsmith , No.
I’m still blogging Section 230 cases as I see them, even though these posts are likely to have only historical value. ] * * * The court summarizes the horrifying allegations: In April 2022, Defendant Bendjy Charles (“Charles”) and Romelus raped Plaintiff. Charles and Romelus filmed each other while they raped Plaintiff.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content