This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy This summer, I wrote that the jury trial between Ryanair and Booking Holdings ended in the strangest way possible. The jury returned a verdict that Booking Holdings had caused exactly $5,000 in legally cognizable loss to Ryanair under the CFAAthe statutory minimum to establish a CFAA claim. Van Buren v.
Federal statutes do not provide clear answers to these questions, so courts will need to confront them. Already, lawsuits involving AI-generated works have been filed in federal courts from coast to coast. This free database provides public records of lawsuits in federal trial and appellate courts. However, the U.S.
As for the legal briefing on your own cases, book a demo with Clio to see how our practice management solution can help you keep case information and documents organized and boost your productivity. Unlike legal briefs , case briefs are not submitted to the court or opposing counsel. What is a case brief?
Not only that, but this case makes it more likely that other plaintiffs and defendants will suffer lengthy, protracted litigation to reach similarly absurd conclusions. Booking Holdings Inc. A few days after the summary judgment decision, three of the defendants, Booking Holdings, Inc.,
The court summarizes the plaintiffs’ allegations: D.G. Seeking redress, Plaintiffs sued Defendants on the theory that their design decisions and failure to disclose the dangers of their products were the cause of D.G.s The court dismisses Roblox, Google, and Apple from the case. Plaintiffs further allege that D.G.s
Flixbus successfully defends by saying that the plaintiff consented to the disclosures via its TOS. The court correctly calls this a “clickwrap.” ” The court says that the TOS made adequate disclosures of the pixel’s conduct. This is a Meta Pixels case involving the bus service Flixbus.
The Court Opinion Greer was a target of one of Kiwi Farms’ attacks. He self-published a book about the experience (“ Why I Sued Taylor Swift and How I Became Falsely Known as Frivolous, Litigious and Crazy “). “Kiwi Farms users provided a Google Drive link to a full copy of Mr. Greer’s book.”
He orally licensed the beats to Rivers for a 50% royalty and a promise to keep booking live performances for White. White alleges that Rivers stopped booking live performances and thereby abrogated the beats license. DistroKid defends against the direct copyright infringement claim using the volitional conduct argument.
Tomelleri (who has appeared on this blog before ) illustrates fishes (see court exhibit on the right). Note: this case is functionally moot because the defendant, Sunfrog, is already defunct. The question on the table is supposed to be: did the defendant take a legally significant action that resulted in the infringement?
Clio Payments helps automate the invoice creation process and lets you schedule automated payment reminders, ensuring follow-ups happeneven when youre tied up in court or meeting with clients. Automated billing tools like those found in Clio Manage simplify time tracking so you capture every billable moment.
The low grade the court earned is a consequence of it losing many points by misstating the law, misapplying the law, and especially skipping over the part where it was supposed to share its analysis and instead just stated its conclusion. Nope, the Supreme Court didn’t say that. MSCHF Prod. Studio, Inc. LEXIS 32063 (2d Cir.
Let us show you around book a demo today ! A motion for a change of venue is a legal request where a case is transferred from one court jurisdiction to another to ensure a fair trial and avoid bias or undue influence. You will then file the motion with the court and Homeland Security. What is a motion for change of venue?
In an unprecedented move, Broward County Circuit Court Judge Andrew Siegel recently used virtual reality (VR) technology during a stand-your-ground hearing. By immersing himself in the VR simulation, the judge was able to view the crime scene from the defendants point of view, offering a unique perspective on the incident.
She started her legal career in legal aid and as a public defender handling trials and appeals. After her stint as an educator, she decided she wanted to help foster even more change and won a seat on the Michigan Supreme Court where she ultimately ascended to the position of Chief Justice.
11, 2023): Time and again we have declared that “prevailing defendants in copyright cases are presumptively entitled (and strongly so) to recover attorney fees.” A successful defendant, by contrast, recovers nothing he didn’t already have. to Defend Rights” * United Federation of Churches LLC v. .” Johnson, No.
The court doesn’t include a screenshot of the online TOS formation process. The TOS contained an arbitration clause that the defendants seek to invoke. The court characterizes the formation process as a “clickwrap,” which the court says usually create binding contracts.
Weve written extensively on how lawyers can use AI responsibly and, as yet another court decision is released addressing lawyers use of AI, its never been more important to understand the risks and limitations of AI use. How did the court respond to the hallucinations? What does the law say about sanctions and AI hallucinations?
Come let us show you around and book your demo. These predictions are based on analysis of large datasets, often including judicial decisions, court filings, case law, and other legal data. What is predictive analytics? Predictive analytics is the process of forecasting future outcomes using data, statistics, and modeling techniques.
The costs of defending those lawsuits is a financial punishment with censorial consequences, even if the defendant never violated the law. These laws instead sit unused on the books as a drain on society’s resources. Instead, any constitutional challenge will be timely only if/when a bounty claim is filed in court.
The court dismissed all claims on summary judgment except contributory trademark infringement and counterfeiting. The Ninth Circuit overturns much of the lower court’s resolution. Without that knowledge, the defendant need not search for infringement. YYGM owns the Brandy Melville Heart and LA Lightning trademarks.
This post covers an opinion where the court assumes such vertical integration based on the pleadings (it remains to be seen if that’s actually the case). The court says that Pixels could be “counterfeiting” the Canvasfish online store (?) That story is still being written. Trademark Infringement. ” UGH.
At the Committees last meeting in November 2024, it agreed to develop a formal proposal for a new rule which, if adopted, would become Rule 707 of the FRE that would require federal courts to apply Rule 702s standards to machine-generated evidence. See Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules Agenda Book (Nov. 24 Report). Puloka , No.
, Atari sought a preliminary injunction, which the court denies because “Atari has not shown that it is likely to succeed on the merits.” ” In support of Printify’s position, the court summarizes: Printify does not design the products, does not manufacture or print the products, and does not ship the products.
While we are happy to lead an industry disruption, we welcome new competition, which we believe will help accelerate adoption of new AI-powered eDiscovery technologies by courts, law firms, and other stakeholders. We securely give fiduciaries access to assets when required with no password-sharing, no court orders, and correct titling.
A recent Bloomberg Law story by Jacqueline Thomson reminded me of the question posed by Richard Susskind a few years ago: Is a court a service or a place?” The pandemic and other factors suggest the answer is that fundamental fairness demands our courts be less of a place and more of a service. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
A recent Bloomberg Law story by Jacqueline Thomson reminded me of the question posed by Richard Susskind a few years ago: Is a court a service or a place?” The pandemic and other factors suggest the answer is that fundamental fairness demands our courts be less of a place and more of a service. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit.
Get free e-book Lawyers lose 40% of the time they spend working to inefficient, manual processes that cover work outside the practice of law. On top of this, Rocket Matters Event Logic makes sure that tasks and calendar events are properly linked , preventing scheduling conflicts and keeping case deadlines, meetings, and court dates aligned.
Get free e-book Lawyers lose 40% of the time they spend working to inefficient, manual processes that cover work outside the practice of law. On top of this, Rocket Matters Event Logic makes sure that tasks and calendar events are properly linked , preventing scheduling conflicts and keeping case deadlines, meetings, and court dates aligned.
First, NYT alleged that the defendants engaged in copying substantial NYT content when building their Large Language Models. ” Defendants are accused of such “copying” without permission or payment. Finally, the NYT accuses the defendants of attributing false information to the NYT, raising concerns about its credibility.
In litigation and intellectual property matters, it is the responsibility of docketing professionals to ensure that electronic court pleadings and documents are properly and timely filed, to maintain internal databases of docketed documents, and to facilitate access to documents by the firm’s legal professionals. I don’t care.
Mike Dahn , SVP and head of Westlaw product management, went even farther, calling the launch “the biggest transformational change in legal research since the move from books to online legal research.” Smith case include a situation with a supervisor as a defendant?” An answer provided by AI-Assisted Research.
She started her legal career in legal aid and as a public defender handling trials and appeals. After her stint as an educator, she decided she wanted to help foster even more change and won a seat on the Michigan Supreme Court where she ultimately ascended to the position of Chief Justice.
Discover how to speed up court filing and document processes with Clio Draft’s automation features –preparing court forms has never been easier. Since post-trial motions are filed with the trial court, not the appellate court, they are generally the parties’ last chance to ask for relief from the trial court.
In 2021, an application was filed to the US Copyright office, for copyright registration of a comic book consisting of text and images (created partly by a human and partly by AI tool “ Midjourney ”). The US Copyright Office refused to grant copyright protection to that portion of the comic book which was created by the AI tool.
The Supreme Court in Chevron, U.S.A., The Supreme Court ordered two factually similar cases consolidated, Loper Bright Enterprises v. The Supreme Court granted certiorari to determine the future of Chevron. 4] The second step applies when the court cannot clearly discern the meaning of the statute.
Admissibility of evidence: a brief summary There are various forms of evidence that are admissible in court. The court has discretion to make its own determinations on evidentiary rulings within some guidelines. Hearsay evidence Hearsay is an out-of-court statement offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
We help lawyers make evidence-based decisions about the venues they choose and the arguments they make by focusing on the jurisprudence of the judges and courts they interact with. Traction: Active in all 50 states, we have a network of over 12,000 attorneys, 12,000+ expert witnesses, 300+ court reporters, and 150+ interpreters.
It even wrote me a funny Limerick about the Supreme Court: “ There once were nine judges supreme whose robes were a legal dream. Or it could be books. It could be the, you know, Google has a real ability to look at most of the books in the world, through the HathiTrust, and so on. Where are those high quality data?
For lawyers, it’s essential to be able to explain to clients, courts, and other stakeholders how certain AI-driven decisions or recommendations were reached, ensuring trust and upholding our ethical obligations. Can AI-generated documents be submitted as evidence in court? Why is it important ethically for lawyers?
Lawyers passionate about defending their clients and showcasing their work frequently document their thoughts and provide firm updates in a law firm blog. The Florida Supreme Court also rejected his First Amendment claims and in the end, the attorney agreed to a public reprimand and a $1,250 fine.
Then it responded to the arguments by distinguishing the plaintiff’s cases on behalf of the defendant and citing cases as counterexamples. [As Firms should take stock of the data resources they have available including text corpora such as their court filings, briefs, and memoranda.
They tied-up with lenders (who would lend off their books), sourced borrowers for them, and provided value added services to their customers. They expanded their loan books without added risk of borrower default. And they may not mark unpaid loans as stressed or non-performing assets (in their books). Lenders also benefitted.
“This episode is one for the record books.” Between skewering the poor lawyer who filed bogus cases in court that he found on ChatGPT and pondering the grizzly question of whether a camera mounted on a bear constituted an unlawful search and seizure, it may have been the funniest episode ever of Legaltech Week.
“This episode is one for the record books.” – Stephanie Wilkins , editor-in-chief of Legaltech News. 00:52:14 Niki Black: A court ruling echoes, in digital domains, Striking a balance ‘twixt liberty and chains. Access to algorithms, once veiled and opaque, To the defendant it grants, a truth to partake.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content