This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
If youre considering bringing a lawsuit, or if youve been sued by someone else, you may come across a lot of unfamiliar terms and concepts. A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. Whats a Statute of Limitations?
This blog post presents an overview of existing examples of judges responding to allegedly deepfaked evidence. What our limited case law tells us In some cases, judges have displayed strong displeasure at a party trying to pass the buck by crying “deepfake” without basis. At the Wisconsin v.
In September 2023, the FTC, along with 19 states, filed a lawsuit against Amazon , alleging that the company used three different algorithmic pricing models to sustain its monopoly power. The lawsuit is scheduled to go to trial in October 2026. In August 2024, the DOJ, along with 8 other states, filed a lawsuit against RealPage Inc.,
I hope other judges will consider this opinion when confronted with similar plaintiffs’ arguments. If I were the plaintiffs, I would file an amended complaint trying to address the judge’s issues, then appeal if that isn’t successful. Activision appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
What Do You Need To Prove in a Birth Injury Lawsuit? Birth injury lawsuits usually involve negligence claims. Jurors and judges generally arent familiar with the medical profession. Frivolous lawsuits could increase the costs of malpractice insurance, which are passed down to consumers. How Is Cerebral Palsy Treated?
Whether youre a law student attempting to master case briefing, or a lawyer seeking to re-learn this skill to advocate more effectively, this blog post provides a useful cheat sheet to make tackling case briefs more efficient. If you include these summaries, be sure to address why a judge decided to write their separate opinion.
Toyota brought a SAD Scheme case against 103 defendants before Judge Daniel in the Northern District of Illinois. As I recently mentioned , Judge Daniel is calling out overreaching joinder allegations in SAD Scheme cases. Judge Daniel responds unambiguously: “None of these arguments are persuasive.” Do better).
Last year, the Ninth Circuit said that plaintiffs could get around Section 230 in their lawsuit against the app maker YOLO because the app maker said it would ban users for inappropriate statements and would unmask harassers. This blog post covers the YOLO case remand after that Section 230 ruling. I don’t know.
This is a copyright SAD Scheme case before Judge Harjani , appointed to the Northern District of Illinois ealirer this year. In this ruling, Judge Harjani questions joinder on his own initiative. In this ruling, Judge Harjani questions joinder on his own initiative. But I did blog one such case recently (Dongguan Juyuan v.
The past year was marked by many more filed cases than decisions, and those decisions that were issued largely demonstrated how well-known pitfalls will also hamper this new wave of AI lawsuits. 6] Despite these challenges, plaintiffs are not slowing down, and new lawsuits were filed at a steady clip over the course of 2024.
This is the instant-classic lawsuit involving a Saskatchewan farmer who text-messaged a “thumbs-up” emoji in response to an offer to buy his flax. Prior blog post. The lower court judge should feel good about his work. Nevertheless, the lower court judge wrote a strong and thoughtful opinion that held up on appeal.
But I’m pretty sure getting 8-75 likes at Instagram, especially for posts that might be considered thirst traps, isn’t impressive, and I think the court is silently judging that. ” I will have you know that I am fully showered and wearing (mostly) clean clothes (and not my jammies) as I write this blog post.
Further insights could be gleaned based on the type of case, jurisdiction, judge, or even opposing counsel. If your plaintiffs firm is consistently appearing before a judge that statistically favors motions to dismiss from defendants, you can factor that into your revenue projections and estimated timelines. The result?
Prior Blog Posts on the SAD Scheme Serial Copyright Plaintiff Lacks Standing to Enforce Third-Party CopyrightsViral DRM v 7News Another N.D. Judge Balks at SAD Scheme JoinderZaful v. Schedule A Defendants Judge Rejects SAD Scheme JoinderToyota v. Schedule A Defendants Another Judge Balks at SAD Scheme JoinderXie v.
In other circumstances where a SAD Scheme plaintiff gets caught making a serious litigation error, the judge typically will resolve the motion on its desk and move on. If I were a judge, and I realized that Modlily’s bad case prep had led me to grant extraordinary relief to Modlily, I would be PISSED.
”] This lawsuits raises one of the venerable but surprisingly vexing copyright law questions: when is a price copyrightable? This lawsuit was filed in early January. Kudos to the judge for getting this case to a resolution in four months. Nivoda appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. May 2, 2025).
This lawsuit purports to focuses on the allegedly defective operation of the services’ reporting tools, but the plaintiffs’ goal was to hold the services accountable for their alleged inaction in response to some reports. Thus far, the entire lawsuit failed on prima facie grounds, before the court reached Section 230.
I’m blogging this otherwise-routine opinion because I blogged another opinion involving Viral DRM where it tried a SAD Scheme attack on various YouTube uploaders. To be clear, the ruling I’m blogging today isn’t a SAD Scheme case. 28, 2025) Prior Blog Posts on the SAD Scheme Another N.D. Alibaba N.D.
Prior blog post on the district court ruling. Back in the old days, judges were baffled by keyword advertising. ” Wow, talk about appellate judge making up facts. The Concurrence In her concurrence, Judge Desai would have gone further to say that competitive keyword advertising isn’t a trademark use in commerce.
Bell has filed at least 25 copyright lawsuits. Two prior blog posts on Bell’s litigation efforts: Fair Use Protects High Schools Use of Inspirational MemeBell v. The judge doesn’t appear to be a fantasy/sci-fi fan, because better candidates for most-read literary works would include the Harry Potter and Tolkien series.
Whether copyrighted works can be freely used to train generative artificial intelligence (“AI”) models is at the core of dozens of lawsuits filed since AI burst onto the scene several years ago. Just one day later, on June 25, 2025, Judge Chhabria handed down a decision in Meta , which cited Anthropic.
I imagine many judges would have been less sanguine about the defendant’s mistakes/sloppy practices. The post Copyright Owner Prevails in Lawsuit Over Form Contracts–Equine Legal v. Fireline Farms appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. 12, 2025) Want more about the Internet law of horses?
A few recent copyright cases worthy of blog coverage, but not worthy of a standalone post. Shockingly, the plaintiff didnt contest any of the other 512 elements, so Joybuy defeats the lawsuit. I can’t tell why the plaintiff’s narrative fell so flat before this judge, but I don’t know how repeatable this ruling is.
Even though the legal system punished the wrongdoers, the lawsuits continue. In those cases, the district court judge has drawn its distinctions between claims based on third-party content and claims that don’t depend on the content per se. Salesforce * Omegle Defeats Lawsuit Over Users CappingMH v. Case Citation : Doe v.
Prior blog post. ” Judge Ho concurs in the judgment, saying that he agrees with Justice Thomas’ dissent in Brown v. However, because Justice Thomas’ view didn’t carry the day then, Judge Ho grudingly is forced to apply the actual law. Bonta Section 230 Defeats Underage Users Lawsuit Against GrindrDoll v.
Still, it’s a troubling ruling as a standalone microcosm of how judges’ attitudes towards censorship and free speech are flexible. Garland appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Trump * WeChat Executive Order Enjoined Because (Of Course) Its UnconstitutionalWeChat Users v.
9) Supreme Court Tamps Down on Jawboning and Government Social Media Lawsuits. If any of those lawsuits succeed, they pose a potential existential threat to the entire industry. Many judges have turned against Section 230, so we’re seeing a proliferation of jurisprudential experimentation with ideas of how to gut it.
Policymakers who support harming children–intentionally or not–deserve our opprobrium…and maybe do not deserve our votes… Blog Posts on Segregate-and-Suppress Obligations Prof. Bonta Section 230 Defeats Underage User’s Lawsuit Against Grindr–Doll v. Paxton Snapchat Isn’t Liable for Offline Sexual Abuse–VV v.
March 31, 2025) Blog Posts on Segregate-and-Suppress Obligations Why I Emphatically Oppose Online Age Verification Mandates Californias Age-Appropriate Design Code (AADC) Is Completely Unconstitutional (Multiple Ways)NetChoice v. Bonta Section 230 Defeats Underage Users Lawsuit Against GrindrDoll v. Case Citation : NetChoice LLC v.
Given how judges have turned against Section 230, at this point any appellate ruling that applies Section 230 without narrowing its scope is important. The majority says that if 230 is a policy problem, the “question whether, and to what extent, Section 230 should be modified is a question for Congress, not for judges.”
But the plaintiffs found a judge who gave them enough benefit of the doubt to survive a motion to dismiss. violations; but I also think it’s clear this lawsuit is going to fail eventually. Amazon appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. That’s a litigation strategy, I guess. Amazon.com, Inc.
[Note: my blogging hiatus is due to a trip to China. I will return to the US this weekend and presumably resume my regular blogging cadence then.] This is a confusing lawsuit that has been through several names, including “Sarah v. Salesforce * Omegle Defeats Lawsuit Over User’s “Capping”–MH v.
Online addiction lawsuits are proliferating across the country, a trend that will continue so long as plaintiffs think they can win. What happens at the end of these lawsuits remains to be seen. That, combined with the novelty of Generative AI and the judge’s uncertainties about the technology, flummoxes the judge.
” If that phrase sounds familiar, it’s because I’ve been referencing this paper on the blog for months. Bonta Section 230 Defeats Underage Users Lawsuit Against GrindrDoll v. Yost Many Fifth Circuit Judges Hope to Eviscerate Section 230Doe v. Reyes Another Texas Online Censorship Law Partially EnjoinedCCIA v.
Judge Nicholas Ranjan of the Western District of Pennsylvania has issued a standing order titled “‘ SCHEDULE A’ CASE STANDING ORDER.” ” I couldn’t find the order on Judge Ranjan’s website or via standard Google searches. Instead, it appeared on the docket of BUSH v. ” ex parte TROs.
I’m continuing my coverage of the blog’s 20th blogiversary. I asked readers to share their favorite blog topics, posts, and memes. ” __ “I’ve always turned to your blog when SCOTUS copyright decisions come down. Readers’ Favorite Topics “the emoji law genre.
All of the named Senators deserve condemnation for their censorial mindset (and the named individuals remaining in the Senate have learned nothing from this and the other lawsuits over their jawboning). Facebook Another Jawboning Case Fails in the 9th Circuit (But a TAFS Judge Doesnt Like the Biden Administration)Rogalinksi v.
3] The city of Norfolk has deployed 172 ‘Flock Safety’ ALPRs, resulting in numerous lawsuits. [4] 6] The lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief that would constitute the use of these cameras as a Fourth Amendment violation and would permanently enjoin the City of Norfolk and its police department from operating the Flock cameras. [7]
I did a fairly lengthy blog post on the intersection of copyright law and city council videos a decade ago; and see this piece by Frank LoMonte about the intersection between copyright law and FOIA laws for government records. In the last month, two more copyright lawsuits over city council videos have triggered my alerts.
I’ll restart my normal blogging, but I’m having trouble focusing.] This is a design patent SAD Scheme case before Judge Jeremy C. The joinder problems should be obvious even without any past litigation experience, but at least the judge is now preemptively asking the right questions.
I’m primarily blogging this for the Section 230 discussion, but the Vullo/jawboning discussion is also in-scope. June 3, 2025) Selected Jawboning Posts Facebook Defeats Armslist’s Account Termination Lawsuit–Armslist v. Google Facebook Defeats Jawboning Lawsuit Over COVID Misinformation Removal–Rogalinski v. Kennedy Jr.
The account termination lawsuits keep coming , so I’ll keep blogging them. his first-hand experiences losing this lawsuit might give the plaintiff more inspiration for future political cartoons. Google Twitter Account Suspension Lawsuits Keep FailingHall v. Houston Another Anti-Vaxxer Jawboning Lawsuit FailsICAN v.
” A reminder that Section 230 cases often require the judges to apply the immunity to tragic facts. Yet, its wording was cumbersome enough that plaintiffs have nevertheless sought to overturn that modification–and have gotten some district court judges to agree along the way. raise the scienter bar.
This is another lawsuit against Grindr claiming that Grindr made it too easy for underage users to sign up and meet other users for sex. A commendation to Judge Jerry D. Prior Blog Posts About Grindr Five Decisions Illustrate How Section 230 Is Fading Fast ‘Scruff’ App Qualifies for Section 230 Immunity–J.R. Pelphrey, 2024 Ky.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content