This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
When Can a Federal Court Hear a Case? There are two main situations in which a federal court might be able to hear a case. Otherwise, a state court will hear the case. The judge can rule in favor of one party or the other at this point because they dont need the help of the jury to apply the law. (A
This blog post presents an overview of existing examples of judges responding to allegedly deepfaked evidence. What our limited case law tells us In some cases, judges have displayed strong displeasure at a party trying to pass the buck by crying “deepfake” without basis. At the Wisconsin v.
This includes individuals with visual impairments (who might use screen readers), hearing impairments, motor difficulties (who might navigate using a keyboard), or cognitive disabilities. Ideally, supplement this with testing by actual users with disabilities or by simulating the use of various assistive technologies (like screen readers).
Toyota brought a SAD Scheme case against 103 defendants before Judge Daniel in the Northern District of Illinois. As I recently mentioned , Judge Daniel is calling out overreaching joinder allegations in SAD Scheme cases. Judge Daniel responds unambiguously: “None of these arguments are persuasive.” Do better).
But I’m pretty sure getting 8-75 likes at Instagram, especially for posts that might be considered thirst traps, isn’t impressive, and I think the court is silently judging that. ” I will have you know that I am fully showered and wearing (mostly) clean clothes (and not my jammies) as I write this blog post.
Generative AI has transformed how people around the world work; how they create; and what they see, hear, and watch online. There are also likely to be fundamental disagreements among judges as to the strength of core defenses like fair use, which in the past have split appellate courts and even the Supreme Court. Anthropic (Case No.
Both you and opposing counsel may be making pre-trial motions, such as motions in limine or motions for bifurcation of trial, and attending hearings on those motions. For jury trials, you will need to submit proposed jury instructions and plan your juror selection strategy, and the judge will likely require trial briefs.
Since motions for discovery are filed after meet-and-confer efforts have failed, you want those efforts to be well-documented to support your argument at the motion hearing. However, be wary of relying on written communication alone, since many judges will want to see efforts to resolve disputes done over the phone or in person.
One recent session we had: Landing a Clerkship: A Guide for Law Students , offers an in-depth look at the competitive clerkship process, helping students understand what judges seek in applicants and how to craft a standout application. Your legal career starts now let us help you take it to the next level!
I’m blogging this otherwise-routine opinion because I blogged another opinion involving Viral DRM where it tried a SAD Scheme attack on various YouTube uploaders. To be clear, the ruling I’m blogging today isn’t a SAD Scheme case. 28, 2025) Prior Blog Posts on the SAD Scheme Another N.D. Alibaba N.D.
Prior blog post on the district court ruling. Back in the old days, judges were baffled by keyword advertising. ” Wow, talk about appellate judge making up facts. The Concurrence In her concurrence, Judge Desai would have gone further to say that competitive keyword advertising isn’t a trademark use in commerce.
In those cases, the district court judge has drawn its distinctions between claims based on third-party content and claims that don’t depend on the content per se. 18, 2025) Prior Blog Posts About Grindr Section 230 Defeats Underage Users Lawsuit Against GrindrDoll v. This panel reiterated that the 230 exceptions have limits.
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the TikTok ban, and Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Free Speech Coalition v. That outcome conflicts with both prior Ninth Circuit precedent and the jurisprudence in the California state courts, and at least one lower-court judge has already pushed back on it. In Bride v.
As a family lawyer, you likely hear the same questions daily: “How long will the divorce take?” This dynamic places them in the position of guiding both their clients and unrepresented ex-spouses through complex proceduresa burden that extends proceedings and can frustrate judges managing similar procedural assistance.
(As we know, Generative AI has a bias towards telling the engagers what they want to hear, so this type of “encouragement” is currently inherent in Generative AI models). That, combined with the novelty of Generative AI and the judge’s uncertainties about the technology, flummoxes the judge. and Google.
[Note: my blogging hiatus is due to a trip to China. I will return to the US this weekend and presumably resume my regular blogging cadence then.] Omegle * To No One’s Surprise, FOSTA Is Confounding Judges–J.B. This is a confusing lawsuit that has been through several names, including “Sarah v.
Judge Nicholas Ranjan of the Western District of Pennsylvania has issued a standing order titled “‘ SCHEDULE A’ CASE STANDING ORDER.” ” I couldn’t find the order on Judge Ranjan’s website or via standard Google searches. Instead, it appeared on the docket of BUSH v. ” ex parte TROs.
” A reminder that Section 230 cases often require the judges to apply the immunity to tragic facts. The Senate Commerce Committee expressly modified FOSTA to add the higher scienter after its emotionally-wrenching SESTA hearing (one of my least favorite professional moments of my career). raise the scienter bar.
I suspect this was the Kentucky circuit court judge’s first time hearing a Section 230 case, and he navigated Section 230’s complex doctrines and the plaintiff’s murky 230-workaround arguments thoughtfully and precisely. A commendation to Judge Jerry D. Case Citation : Doll v. Pelphrey, 2024 Ky. LEXIS 84 (Ky.
I’m blogging this case as an exemplar, not because it’s unique.] Focus claimed that GM was “counterfeiting,” and a judgehearing an ex parte TRO wouldn’t have had any reason to doubt that–until it heard GM’s grey market goods explanation, in which case Focus’ story would fall apart.
In an explosive exposé last week, The Wall Street Journal reported that 131 federal judges broke the law by hearing cases where they had a financial interest. To uncover those violations, reporters reviewed the financial holdings of some 700 federal judges and compared them against tens of thousands of court cases.
This resource covers topics such as the various types of agencies, the steps for making regulations, and the administrative hearing process. Formal rulemaking generally involves a hearing on the record, including the presentation of evidence. Informal rulemaking can proceed more efficiently because it does not involve a hearing.
On November 22, 2023, the lawsuit against Lizzo by three of her previous backup dancers had its first court hearing. Continue reading → The post Behind the Bench: Unpacking Judge Epstein’s Inquiries in Lizzo Lawsuit Hearing first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog.
In May 2023, a federal judge discovered fake cases cited in a filed brief. The subsequent sanctions hearing incited debates across the legal community. When questioned, the lawyer indicated he used ChatGPT to help with the research and drafting process and was “unaware its contents could be false.”
a live blog post of a College of Law Practice Management virtual event. Sohail Mohammed—electrical engineer, New Jersey Superior Court Judge, court innovator and teacher. In just over one week, 95% of NJ judges and staff were available online. In just over one week, 95% of NJ judges and staff were available online.
The balding, stern-faced judge stares down at me from his bench, framed by flags to either side of him, a judicial seal on the wall behind him. It is just the judge, the jury and me. The judge nods, but it looks like a nod of impatience, not of listening. Click another button, and I see myself from the perspective of the judge.
This case got assigned to Judge Alsup’s courtroom. I previously summarized Judge Alsup’s modus operandi about motions to dismiss: Judge Alsup gives the benefit of the doubt to plaintiffs on motions to dismiss, only to hammer them on summary judgment if their evidence doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.
In other words, the court could have–AND SHOULD HAVE–called out these issues during the ex parte TRO hearing. The judge doesn’t issue a mea culpa for her avoidable mistake or excoriate Viral DRM for getting an undeserved TRO. Judge Pushes Back on Copyright SAD Scheme Cases–Viral DRM v.
So but I hear we have another Schwartz. Then I’m sure the judge is saying sorry, doesn’t cut it. So that was terrifying to honestly, to walk into that final hearing, you get sort of like one shot. Excuse was Sorry, didn’t check it. Basically, if we lost they would be sent back to Honduras and likely murdered. Like, I want it.
After a couple of defendants showed up, the judge denied a TRO extension because of the possible lack of merit in the plaintiff’s infringement allegations. 2, 2024) Prior Blog Posts on the SAD Scheme Why Online Marketplaces Don’t Do More to Combat the SAD Scheme–Squishmallows v. Then, the case fell apart.
This includes the rules as set by rightsowners in ex parte proceedings, which can deviate widely from standard doctrine–it’s whatever the rightsowners can get the judges to agree to–and the rules set by third-party intermediaries, such as online marketplaces. Judge Pushes Back on Copyright SAD Scheme Cases–Viral DRM v.
Step Six: 14 days after the Initial Order and payment of the second fee, the CCB issues a Scheduling Order , which includes a timeline for the respondent’s response, pre-discovery conference, discovery, post-discovery conference, written position statements, a hearing, and determination. We will have to wait and see! Oppenheimer v.
” The majority summarizes this discussion: “judges are not experts in the cybersecurity field. A rehearing would be appropriate because the deciding vote was cast by a visiting judge, not a regular 9th Circuit judge. Blog post on amicus briefs. Blog post on Asurvio v. Blog post on that ruling.
For those reasons, I strongly suspect this will not be the last we hear of this case. Judge Whyte’s ruling has been adopted in all circuits that have considered the issue. One can hear the protests of “that’s socialism!” Instagram, LLC (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
When I first blogged this case in January 2021, I wrote: This lawsuit, like many others before it, claims that UGC services like YouTube commit illegal discrimination based on how they moderate content. Google appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. This long-running lawsuit started in 2019.
I’ve been shocked at how acquiescent judges have been towards SAD Scheme cases, especially in the Northern District of Illinois, where the judges see these cases frequently and surely have witnessed first-hand some litigation abuses. agent, but still represent at the hearing that its home base was his law firm.
Did you hear? This means you can “Google” Colorado state trial court records on Trellis to uncover key intelligence on: judges, opposing counsel, clients, motions, rulings, dockets and other legal issues. first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog. Colorado State Trial Courts are now on Trellis ? COLORADO Whether you want to.
Although the plaintiffs should celebrate the opportunities to get out of Texas and enjoy the wonderful tourism in California, plaintiffs will much prefer Texas judgeshearing Texans’ censorial gripes. * * * The plaintiffs run private Facebook groups. appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
When you hear the name Ralph Waldo Emerson, maybe you think of this 19th-century man as an abolitionist. Blogs , podcasts, books and webinars are readily accessible. Or perhaps the question is: Why aren’t you marketing your practice more? You have too much money? You leave marketing to others in the firm? Or maybe you’re just scared.
If you or members of your team have IoT-connected devices at home like Amazon’s Alexa or a Nest security camera, you need to be wary of what work-related information those devices might see or hear during the day. We tried to participate in virtual court hearings and prayed our video didn’t freeze or our audio wouldn’t get choppy.
This is a live blog post of a 75-minutes video discussion with Richard Susskind and Mark Cohen about “UK vs US – the next decade” and “Skills and education for legal professionals in the 2020s”. This is a live blog post. Mark cites that during law school, he clerked for a judge for three years.
LFI also gives litigators specific insights into judges, opposing counsel tactics, and case outcomes. Ryan McClead also published a three part series that’s on three geeks in a law blog detailing some of the findings that we had. Trellis uses both technology and human QA processes to ensure the accuracy of the raw trial court data.
And you hear a lot of hype. And I think we’re hearing that there’s probably not at least at this point in time, a Mark Noel 4:07 lot of folks haven’t done the math on some of these things. And, you know, you were kind of afraid that people wouldn’t, you know, judges lawyers wouldn’t accept it. We’d love to hear from you.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content