This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Creating an effective lawyer blog post in 2025 requires a strategic approach that combines timeless principles with modern technological advancements. While foundational blogging practices remain essential, integrating AI and other cutting-edge tools can maximize your blogs impact. Individuals facing family law issues?
In July, Professors Vikram Amar & Michael Dorf addressed many key decisions by the Supreme Court, discussing the ways they may have changed the legal landscape. Our trusted professors are now back again to provide an engaging dialogue as to what is on the docket for the upcoming Supreme Court Term. credit hours. More Questions?
The Foreclosure Law Center provided by Justia aims to illuminate what can be a complex process. In a judicial foreclosure , the lender seeks a judgment from a court to foreclose on the home. On the other hand, a non-judicial foreclosure allows a lender to foreclose on the property outside court.
A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. What Can You Ask a Court To Do? What you want the court to do is usually called a remedy. What you want the court to do is usually called a remedy.
The Workers’ Compensation Law Center at Justia provides insights on how the process unfolds. Even if a business labels a worker as an independent contractor, they still are considered an employee if they meet the definition of this term under state law. Ultimately, they might pursue an appeal in state court.
Your website plays a critical role in how potential clients discover, evaluate, and ultimately choose your law firm. This means your law firms website needs to be accessible to people with vision, hearing, mobility, and cognitive impairments. So, which level should your law firm aim for? Law firms are not exempt.
Mercado for an overview of the current state of domestic violence law. Specifically, it explores the intersection with both family and criminal law, and how those intersections are being transformed by new legal interpretations and legislative efforts. Hascup and Angelica M. Register for free today ! ET/10:00 a.m. Angelica M.
On January 22, Booking.coms renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law (JMOL) was granted. The JMOL had two primary conclusions: First , that the CFAA has extraterritorial application, and therefore it was appropriate for this court to apply the CFAA here. But this court says, not so. Van Buren v. United States , 593 U.S.
This blog post presents an overview of existing examples of judges responding to allegedly deepfaked evidence. What our limited case law tells us In some cases, judges have displayed strong displeasure at a party trying to pass the buck by crying “deepfake” without basis. The Court responded , “That’s probably enough to get it in.”
A journey in the legal profession starts with getting a degree from a law school. Prospective law students can consider a broad range of programs across the country, each with its own strengths. In an effort to help prospective law students compare their options, Justia has significantly enhanced the law school profiles in our U.S.
As neurotechnology advances at lightning speed, one thing is clear: the law is struggling to keep up. Nita Farahany , a leading expert in neurotechnology, ethics, and law, has dedicated her career to exploring how emerging technologies intersect with cognitive rights. I had always been passionate about science and the law.
Guest blog post by Profs. The first product Lululemon discusses in its complaint is the DEFINE jacket, for which the company owns two federal trade dress registrations and, it alleges, common law trade dress rights. But the case law makes clear that establishing acquired distinctiveness for trade dress features is more complicated.
McDermott, represented by the Sanders Law Group, sued KMC for copyright infringement. The defendant conceded summary judgment on liability, and the court held a trial on damages. This post covers the court’s ruling following the damages trial. The court runs through multiple considerations: Defendant’s state of mind.
They also may want to learn about the procedures in these situations, such as what happens during a traffic stop and in court. The Traffic Tickets Legal Center at Justia addresses substantive and procedural issues in this area of law. Drivers in most states do not have a right to a jury in traffic court.
If you are a claimant, there is an 88% chance that your claim will be dismissed because you gave up, failed to comply with the rules, or the defendant opted out (forcing you to go to federal district court if you want to pursue the claim, which is even more costly and complicated).
In the Bannon case, the appeals court held that Bannon’s post could qualify for anti-SLAPP protection and remanded to explore if Nelson met his pleading burdens. The court easily disagrees. The court says the test for public interest is measured objectively, not subjectively, and was satisfied here.
As we approach the end of the year, here are the Top 10 SEC Cyber/AI posts on the Debevoise Data Blog in 2024 by page views. If you are not already a Blog subscriber, click here to sign up. The authors would like to thank Debevoise Law Clerk Achutha Raman for his contribution to this blog post.
Whether youre a law student attempting to master case briefing, or a lawyer seeking to re-learn this skill to advocate more effectively, this blog post provides a useful cheat sheet to make tackling case briefs more efficient. Unlike legal briefs , case briefs are not submitted to the court or opposing counsel.
In other words… plaintiffs are once again arguing that deploying biometric-based age authentication violates privacy law. (I I previously blogged on this issue in 2023. If they comply with those laws, will they get hammered for privacy violations? Second, the court turns to the TOS formation question.
This blog post unpacks the proposed CCPA rules on ADMTs, compares them with GDPRs Article 22 protections on automated decision making. While the CCPAs proposed rules are promising, they still diverge in key respects from the GDPR Europes comprehensive data protection law that has been setting the standard since 2018.
For one, the law aimed to shield online platforms services from liability for unlawful third-party content, avoiding overburdening online platforms in monitoring user-generated content. On the other hand, the law was supposed to encourage self-policing of offensive material. In Manhattan Community Access Corp. In Moody v.
Shopify said California courts lack personal jurisdiction over it. The district court agreed with Shopify, as did a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit. The en banc court issues a total of four opinions, and collectively they show Shopify was never close. Briskin sued Shopify for a variety of privacy violations in California.
Competition and Markets Authority, and the European Commission pledged to remain vigilant about the risk that algorithms can allow competitors to share competitively sensitive information, fix prices, or collude on other terms or business strategies in violation of our competition laws.
Extensively citing Chabolla , the court rejects the arbitration request. The court says Plex’s relationship context cuts against TOS formation. The court’s treatment of the sign-up screen’s call-to-action is perplexing (no pun intended). Plex offers free video streaming.
” The plaintiffs brought a pre-enforcement challenge to the law, but the court denies a preliminary injunction. The court explains: Deepfakes are image, audio, or video files that mimic real or nonexistent people saying and doing things that never happened. The court does realize the overlap here, right?
From defining what actually constitutes the unauthorized practice of law to dissecting real disciplinary cases, this webinar equips lawyers, especially those early in their careers, with the insights needed to avoid common ethical pitfalls and practice confidently within legal bounds.
When I started the blog, I didn’t contemplate having guest bloggers. As it turns out, about 20% of the blog posts have been made by guest bloggers. Mark Bartholomew (Buffalo Law) Sam Bayard Prof. Law) Nyssa Chopra Prof. Stephen Diamond (Santa Clara Law) Prof. Leah Chan Grinvald (now at UNLV Law) Prof.
In a ruling with potential implications for other pending generative artificial intelligence (AI) copyright cases, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in Thomson Reuters Enterprise Centre GmbH & West Publishing Corp. ROSS Intelligence Inc. some creative spark.
In a law firm, one of the most time-consuming and resource-intensive tasks is client engagement—gathering client information, obtaining case facts, and organizing supporting documents. Enter AI, specifically large language models (LLMs) and AI agents, which are revolutionizing how law firms handle client intake and case management.
Although technical SEO alone won’t guarantee top rankings, it is crucial for effectively managing a law firm’s website. For law firm websites, HTTPS protects sensitive information and builds trust by showing users that the site is safe and secure. It is critical for website security and search engine rankings.
A few initial remarks] The Supreme Court’s ruling will foster more online censorship. The Supreme Court endorses a “Fortress USA” approach, i.e., that legislatures can impose special rules that create a bordered Internet customized for the US and more heavily censored than the Internet in other countries.
” (Plus, the court notes that while he’s in prison, his job prospects are limited). Section 230 The court says it doesn’t need to address Section 230 because the claims all fail on their prima facie elements. Defendant-victimization is also a main justification for broadly applicable anti-SLAPP laws.
The court summarizes the case: Rodney Woodland, a freelance artist and model, posts semi-naked photographs of himself in different poses on Instagram. The court displayed all of the photos side-by-side, so of course we’re going to look at them. I guess that makes me old-school. So I think this is a SFW post.
Some people also may find it a hassle to comply with the strict requirements under state law for starting and operating a corporation. Advantages include tax benefits and a court system with special expertise in corporate issues. In states where theyre more often allowed, courts will look at whether theyre reasonable.
You’ll discover how law firms can harness the power of AI and state court data to… Continue reading → The post Podcast Alert: Making Court Data Actionable with AI Trellis CEO Shares Insights with Host Bim Dave on Legal Helm Show first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog.
The court disagrees but gives plaintiffs leave to amend. (As As usual, there is a lot more going on in this case beyond trespass to chattels, but I’m focusing this blog post just on that claim). The court says these allegations aren’t good enough in light of Hamidi. The court cites Doe I v.
The court says the plaintiff had standing: “Salazar’s alleged injury stems from the unauthorized disclosure of his personal viewing information, which is closely related to at least one common-law analog traditionally recognized as providing a basis for a lawsuit in American courts: public disclosure of private facts.”
However, courts have not yet adopted this opinion. Ross Intelligence , the first significant judicial ruling on AI training and fair use, the court rejected Ross Intelligence’s fair use defense. Additionally, courts should not only focus on the training process, but also on the output of such voice models when assessing market harm.
This post is all about you…readers of the blog! My blog post usually aren’t meant to be accessible to beginners. As a result, since nearly the blog’s beginning, I’ve done little to cater to beginners. I’m very grateful for your blog!” You help me push my own thinking.”
Today, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, regarding a Texas law that requires adult-oriented websites to age-authenticate all users–minors and adults alike–before they can enter their “virtual” premises. Texas’ legislative approach wasn’t clever or subtle.
This is where law firm predictive analytics come to the rescue. By leveraging AI and other technologies, law firms can uncover patterns and trends across vast datasetsturning raw information into actionable insight. What is predictive analytics for law firms?
To have case information at your fingertips, whether you are heading into court or running in and out of the office, try Clio Manage and see how this cloud-based practice management tool can simplify your trial work. Another aspect of trial preparation is dealing with opposing counsel and the court prior to trial.
G6 presented the court with a screenshot of Motel 6’s standard account creation process: G6 added the red box for the court. Normally, we’d expect the court to pixel-police this screen, looking for defects. Thus, the court denies arbitration of this case. G6 sought to arbitrate the case per its TOS.
Under California law, “oppression is even more onerous” when a “clause pegs both the scope and procedure of the arbitration to rules which might change.” The court’s reaction is predictable if chilling. RMG decision in my Internet Law course, a terrible browsewrap decision. I still teach the 2007 Ticketmaster v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content