This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. What Can You Ask a Court To Do? What you want the court to do is usually called a remedy. What you want the court to do is usually called a remedy.
In a judicial foreclosure , the lender seeks a judgment from a court to foreclose on the home. On the other hand, a non-judicial foreclosure allows a lender to foreclose on the property outside court. A homeowner who has a defense would need to file a new lawsuit in court. This may take several months or more.
This means your law firms website needs to be accessible to people with vision, hearing, mobility, and cognitive impairments. Provide captions for videos and transcripts for audio content to support users who are deaf or hard of hearing. Alternative Text & Multimedia Accessibility Add descriptive alt text for all images.
This blog post presents an overview of existing examples of judges responding to allegedly deepfaked evidence. In a colloquy with the court, the prosecution argued that a witness familiar with the defendant’s voice could listen to the audio and affirm that it sounds like the defendant. Finally, during the US v. Prosecution objected.
Want to hear from more inspiring speakers? For instance, you’ll see language in Supreme Court opinions suggesting that no one can penetrate the mind. Maintaining a blog that shows your firm is following neurotech developments is a great way to demonstrate you’re at the forefront of this space.”
The court summarizes the case: Rodney Woodland, a freelance artist and model, posts semi-naked photographs of himself in different poses on Instagram. The court displayed all of the photos side-by-side, so of course we’re going to look at them. I guess that makes me old-school. So I think this is a SFW post.
To have case information at your fingertips, whether you are heading into court or running in and out of the office, try Clio Manage and see how this cloud-based practice management tool can simplify your trial work. Another aspect of trial preparation is dealing with opposing counsel and the court prior to trial.
Example: Having AI draft a legal brief for an important court filing. But theAI cant tell who is actuallyyelling(which is improper conduct that only occursinfrequently) and who is appropriately speaking loudly because a customer is hearing-impaired or is in a noisy location (which happens frequently).
Public opinion of the nations judicial system and courts fell to a record-low in 2024, according to the latest Gallup poll. For example, historically the Supreme Court employed antitrust doctrine to ease competitive barriers and reduce costs for things like real estate title searches and bar exam review courses.
Generative AI has transformed how people around the world work; how they create; and what they see, hear, and watch online. There are also likely to be fundamental disagreements among judges as to the strength of core defenses like fair use, which in the past have split appellate courts and even the Supreme Court.
By filing such a motion, youre asking the court to intervene in the discovery process on your behalf. Motions for discovery are important for getting the court to enforce discovery rules. E-discovery often requires more extensive court supervision and oversight. What is a motion for discovery? What is a motion to compel?
Invisible Narratives sought an ex parte TRO to prevent that from happening, which the court grants. The court relies on 512(f) as the basis of the TRO: “Invisible Narratives has presented evidence that Next Level was neither the original creator of Skibidi Toilet nor the lawful copyright owner of Skibidi Toilet characters.
” Toyota cited the 2020 Bose decision, which said that online marketplace alleged counterfeiters could be analogized to BitTorrent infringers, where courts have held that joinder against BitTorrent participants can be supported when they are all part of the same swarm. The rule establishes the standard.
The court says it found “his testimony and opinion not credible,” something no expert witness ever wants to see published in a court opinion. The reason I’m blogging this case is that Ranson used Microsoft Copilot to compute the theoretical value of the reinvested proceeds. Why would he do that?
The rival bought competitive keyword ads (the court uses the term “conquesting,” which I objected to here ) but didn’t include the third-party trademark in the ad copy. The trademark owner sued the advertiser for trademark infringement and lost in the district court. Prior blog post on the district court ruling.
The court says that Viral DRM’s exclusive “management” rights is not the same as ownership or an exclusive license to the copyright. The court says that Viral DRM doesn’t have standing to enforce the copyright. To be clear, the ruling I’m blogging today isn’t a SAD Scheme case.
The district court dismissed the case. The Ninth Circuit affirms every point of the district court’s decision. ” BTW, I disagree with the court’s summation of the Internet Brands case; I feel the Ninth Circuit got that one wrong because that case was always about third-party content. .”
9) Supreme Court Tamps Down on Jawboning and Government Social Media Lawsuits. The Supreme Court is taking a steady stream of Internet Law cases, a trend that will continue for some time. Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the TikTok ban, and Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Free Speech Coalition v.
9] Hearing the case on appeal, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of anti-monopolistic requirements, ordering the divestment of these major studios from their cinemas to ensure more widespread competition. [10] Paramount Pictures, Inc. 8] Functionally, this alleged conspiracy amounted to vertical integration across the film industry. [9]
As a family lawyer, you likely hear the same questions daily: “How long will the divorce take?” We’ve analyzed the latest family law statistics to uncover key trends in divorce outcomes, custody arrangements, and court decisions that impact your daily practice. Family courts are handling diverse caseloads.
The court reaches none of those questions. Instead, the court succinctly says that the case isn’t ripe, so Zuckerman is requesting an unconstitutional advisory opinion. Federal courts do not, and cannot, exist to give advisory opinions to assist investment decisions. from” various precedential cases.
As we know, Generative AI has a bias towards telling the engagers what they want to hear, so this type of “encouragement” is currently inherent in Generative AI models). Component Part Manufacturer The court allows the plaintiff to proceed on the argument that Google is a “component part manufacturer” of Character.ai
[Note: my blogging hiatus is due to a trip to China. I will return to the US this weekend and presumably resume my regular blogging cadence then.] The court previously dismissed the case on Section 230 grounds and rejected the FOSTA workaround. Google” and “Unknown Parties v.
Some of the qualifying disabilities include hearing impairments, speech or language impairments, visual impairments, autism, and specific learning disabilities. In some cases, you also may be able to file a lawsuit in federal court.) However, courts tend to take a close look at these situations.
The appellate court refers to Doe’s behavior as “ capping.” The court dismissed the case on Section 230 grounds. Knowing CSAM Possession The district court dismissed the CSAM civil claim on Section 230 grounds. The 11th Circuit affirms, but relies only partially on Section 230 grounds.
” The court completely dismisses the case per Section 230. The court responds: Grindr’s match function relies upon and publishes a user’s profile and geolocation data, which is third party content generated by the user. ” The court says this is different from Lemmon because “the harm C.D.
I’m blogging this case as an exemplar, not because it’s unique.] The district court dismisses some of GM’s claims but allows others to proceed. Defamation The court says that GM may proceed with a per se defamation claim based on the takedown notices’ alleged injury to its business reputation. (For
Supreme Court handed down its most famous decision involving the powers of government agencies. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the Court in devising a doctrine that has become known as Chevron deference. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the Court in devising a doctrine that has become known as Chevron deference.
Regularly engaging with informative, thought-provoking legal blogs is one of the most effective ways to stay on top of industry news, emerging legal trends, innovations in technology, and more. As a lawyer, you have a lot of choices when it comes to law blogs. What is a legal blog? We’re here to help.
Federal statutes do not provide clear answers to these questions, so courts will need to confront them. Already, lawsuits involving AI-generated works have been filed in federal courts from coast to coast. This free database provides public records of lawsuits in federal trial and appellate courts. A pending lawsuit in the U.S.
” The court says this may have happened here: According to the complaint, TikTok required all content moderators to use its proprietary TCS software. The court also cites the allegation that “TikTok promised its moderators that they could opt out of child pornography by using the queue system, but that system is allegedly faulty.”
When I first blogged this case in January 2021, I wrote: This lawsuit, like many others before it, claims that UGC services like YouTube commit illegal discrimination based on how they moderate content. The latest ruling addresses YouTube’s motion to dismiss the fourth amended complaint, which the court grants with prejudice.
After hearing this allegation at least twice, the Court instructed plaintiffs’ counsel to go present proof of such a bribe and to specifically subpoena the banks that were allegedly involved in laundering the bribe. You can essentially hear Judge Alsup’s teeth gnashing in the opinion. LEXIS 171462 (N.D.
So but I hear we have another Schwartz. Greg Lambert 0:52 Yes, apparently this time in Los Angeles, we in our home, or at least an attorney related to a firm that had to explain why there was a brief submitted to the court that had multiple made up citations in there. Excuse was Sorry, didn’t check it. Like we’re I love the strategy.
I’m going to crank this blog post out before I get swamped with press requests. My takeaways: I did not hear 5 votes in favor of the plaintiffs’ position. I remain unclear why the court granted cert in this case. How would lower courts interpret “aiding & abetting” liability if 230 is lifted?
This tool allows law firms to analyze aggregated and normalized state trial court data to gain competitive intelligence across cases, practice areas, and performance. Collecting this unstructured data from county courts is very challenging, but provides valuable business insights. And I do have to put a warning out for everyone.
There are more than 300 opinions by federal courts dealing with the express preemption of contracts, and within them two main approaches have emerged. Until recently, the Sixth Circuit was the most prominent court that endorsed this approach. In December 2022, the Supreme Court invited the U.S. A third approach?
Step Six: 14 days after the Initial Order and payment of the second fee, the CCB issues a Scheduling Order , which includes a timeline for the respondent’s response, pre-discovery conference, discovery, post-discovery conference, written position statements, a hearing, and determination. b) Alternative Dispute Resolution Process.-A
In addition to their anniversary, Fastcase unveiled their very first new treatise called ‘On Legal AI’ by Joshua Walker which was published by their publishing division called Full Court Press. . Stay tuned to hear their secrets for success and how democratizing the law got them involved in a SCOTUS scuffle. .
Fodder for your blog, email alerts, social media posts, and professional articles is everywhere. Surely you follow the activity of the courts in your jurisdiction so you can properly advise your clients. If your clients hear about news only from others, they may assume you don’t know what’s happening. What should she do?
a live blog post of a College of Law Practice Management virtual event. Sohail Mohammed—electrical engineer, New Jersey Superior Court Judge, court innovator and teacher. Jordan sets the context of all the changes in dispute resolution and courts wrought by the global pandemic. Litigation, ADR, ODR—The Next Normal?
On November 22, 2023, the lawsuit against Lizzo by three of her previous backup dancers had its first courthearing. Continue reading → The post Behind the Bench: Unpacking Judge Epstein’s Inquiries in Lizzo Lawsuit Hearing first appeared on Trellis.Law Blog.
Did you hear? Colorado State Trial Courts are now on Trellis ? This means you can “Google” Colorado state trial court records on Trellis to uncover key intelligence on: judges, opposing counsel, clients, motions, rulings, dockets and other legal issues. Continue reading → The post Trellis Adds Colorado State Trial Courts!
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content