This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
If youre considering bringing a lawsuit, or if youve been sued by someone else, you may come across a lot of unfamiliar terms and concepts. A section of the Lawyers and the Legal Process Center in the Justia Legal Guides tries to make lawsuits and the court process more accessible to the average person. Whats a Statute of Limitations?
This blog post presents an overview of existing examples of judges responding to allegedly deepfaked evidence. What our limited case law tells us In some cases, judges have displayed strong displeasure at a party trying to pass the buck by crying “deepfake” without basis. In Huang v. Similarly, in Valenti v. At the Wisconsin v.
Talk about court red-handed Thomas Claburn Demonstrating yet again that uncritically trusting the output of generative AI is dangerous, attorneys involved in a product liability lawsuit have apologized to the presiding judge for submitting documents that cite non-existent legal cases.
What Do You Need To Prove in a Birth Injury Lawsuit? Birth injury lawsuits usually involve negligence claims. Jurors and judges generally arent familiar with the medical profession. Frivolous lawsuits could increase the costs of malpractice insurance, which are passed down to consumers.
We have all heard about the lawsuit involving Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. After all, one cannot simply turn over their phone to the Court and have a Judge read all the communications between parties. The post Ask Attorney Jennifer B: Are Text Messages Admissible in Divorce Court? Brandt at www.cozen.com.
These are often used as a study aid in law school, but they can be used by practicing attorneys to better understand the implications of case law. Outline the case facts In this section, you will outline the relevant facts that led up to the filing of the lawsuit. Attorneys can think of a case brief as more of a legal memo.
In fact,no two patent attorneys would draft the same patent for the same invention. One attorney might build a tall, narrow tower with thick wallsa highly specific claim thats hard to attack but easy to walk around. But heres the truth that savvy inventors and business owners come to learn: not all patents are created equal.
While there is no guarantee that even a trademark attorney will not run into issues in the registration process, engaging an experienced trademark attorney to ensure your application is thorough, vetted, strategic, and legally sound increases the chances the registration process will avoid pitfalls before the Trademark Office.
Gone are the days when judges were unaware that AI is simply a tool that one may apply to many generic problems. Implications for Patent Filings This decision underscores the importance of claim drafting in patents covering new applications of artificial intelligence.
Further insights could be gleaned based on the type of case, jurisdiction, judge, or even opposing counsel. If your plaintiffs firm is consistently appearing before a judge that statistically favors motions to dismiss from defendants, you can factor that into your revenue projections and estimated timelines. The result?
But I’m pretty sure getting 8-75 likes at Instagram, especially for posts that might be considered thirst traps, isn’t impressive, and I think the court is silently judging that. We’ll get more information about the legitimacy of this case if Lil Nas X requests and gets a 505 fee shift.
Back in the old days, judges were baffled by keyword advertising. ” Wow, talk about appellate judge making up facts. The Concurrence In her concurrence, Judge Desai would have gone further to say that competitive keyword advertising isn’t a trademark use in commerce. ” More manufactured empiricism.
Bell has filed at least 25 copyright lawsuits. While this court might ordinarily suspect that such an assertion was made in jest, there is nothing funny about the dozens of lawsuits which plaintiff has filed against numerous entities which, as the Fifth Circuit noted in Eagle Mountain, were mostly public schools or nonprofits.
I imagine many judges would have been less sanguine about the defendant’s mistakes/sloppy practices. However, the court also says that the plaintiff can get its costs and attorneys’ fees, which will dwarf the damages. Will the attorneys’ fee shift be enough to make this case worthwhile to the plaintiff?
As a personal injury attorney, you’re driven by these human stories. million lawyers in the United States, over 135,000 are personal injury lawyersroughly 10% of all practicing attorneys. For personal injury attorneys, these trends highlight important areas where specialized knowledge will be increasingly valuable.
Online addiction lawsuits are proliferating across the country, a trend that will continue so long as plaintiffs think they can win. What happens at the end of these lawsuits remains to be seen. That, combined with the novelty of Generative AI and the judge’s uncertainties about the technology, flummoxes the judge.
Order requires destruction of departmental data accessed by Musky men Simon Sharwood Trump administration policies that allowed Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency to access systems and data at the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (BFS) have left the org more vulnerable to hacking according to federal Judge Paul A.
3] The city of Norfolk has deployed 172 ‘Flock Safety’ ALPRs, resulting in numerous lawsuits. [4] 6] The lawsuit seeks declaratory and injunctive relief that would constitute the use of these cameras as a Fourth Amendment violation and would permanently enjoin the City of Norfolk and its police department from operating the Flock cameras. [7]
In the last month, two more copyright lawsuits over city council videos have triggered my alerts. 14, 2024) A magistrate judge recommends sending a 512(f) case to trial. On January 6, 2025, the supervising judge summarily approved the magistrate judge’s recommendations. Kilgore , 2024 WL 5295080 (W.D.
Carpenter did not respond to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton ‘s lawsuit accusing her of illegally dispensing abortion-inducing medication in Texas that he says killed a fetus and caused the mother to suffer serious medical complications. Margaret Daley Carpenter of New Paltz, N.Y., The New York Times reported.
By Devan Cole and John Fritze , CNN Concord, New Hampshire CNN — A federal judge agreed Thursday to issue a new nationwide block against President Donald Trump’s executive order seeking to end birthright citizenship.
“We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did. The Toronto-based company recently closed a $2.1
The firm based its lawsuit on DoNotPay’s claims that it allows consumers to “[f]ight corporations, beat bureaucracy and sue anyone at the press of a button,” even though it is not licensed to practice law. District Chief Judge Nancy Rosenstengel. A second California lawsuit, Lee v.
BY SAUL ELBEIN AUSTIN — Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton’s attempt to block a voter registration drive in one of his state’s most populous urban counties — and biggest Democratic strongholds — has failed in state district court.
Represented by lawyers Maria Cristina Armenta and Credence Elizabeth Sol (who keep expanding their oeuvre of failed lawsuits against Internet services), Daniels claimed YouTube had to comply with 1983 because YouTube became a state actor. Google requested attorneys’ fees for its 1983 victory. My blog post on that ruling.
Last Friday, the parties stipulated to dismiss their lawsuit, with Meta formally waiving its right to appeal the controversial January 23rd decision from Judge Chen. Given that most observers in this space were surprised by Judge Chen’s summary judgment decision, Meta’s decision not to appeal seems even more surprising.
After applying statutory damages caps, the judge awarded over $10 million, which was affirmed on appeal. However, they may eventually consider bringing a lawsuit against the facility and any individual employees at fault. Some incidents of financial abuse involve an instrument called a power of attorney.
After a couple of defendants showed up, the judge denied a TRO extension because of the possible lack of merit in the plaintiff’s infringement allegations. The court ruled on Hyponix and NinjaSafe’s requests for damages from the bond, dismissal with prejudice, and attorneys’ fees. Then, the case fell apart.
By Charles Lane A federal judge on Friday tossed out a pre-emptive lawsuit from Nassau County Executive Bruce Blakeman, who sought to stave off legal action by New York Attorney General Letitia James over his decision banning transgender women from playing sports at county-owned facilities, James’ office said.
In the lawsuit I’m covering today, Roblox named over 250 defendants. I bet most of Roblox’s lawsuit would unravel if the judge simply asked Roblox the obvious follow-up question, i.e., “what evidence do you have for each of the other 250 defendants that they sold infringing items in Illinois? Seriously, Roblox?
With the insertion of the url, asking that the summary be bulleted and be writtten in the tone of the source (the clerk or judge who wrote the decision), I receive the below. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company’s defamation claim against attorney Kevin O’Keefe and his law firm, Parke O’Flaherty, Ltd., was dismissed by the court.
The path of every single lawsuit is filled with multiple inflection points, moments where attorneys have to make decisions about how the future is likely to unfold. In the past, attorneys navigated these twists and turns by relying on intuition, experience and anecdotal evidence. It all starts with a judge dashboard.
Here are the key steps involved in the personal injury claim process: Consultation with an attorney: The first step in filing a personal injury claim is to consult an experienced attorney who can evaluate the circumstances of your case and advise you on your legal options.
There are more than 40 million lawsuits in the United states alone every year. And only 2% of those will ultimately proceed with a lawsuit. Contract and small claims cases comprise the bulk of the civil caseload, and unfortunately, most of these lawsuits are baseless claims, also known as frivolous lawsuits.
His lawsuit against Facebook was dashed by Section 230 in the district court. The judge’s response might be characterized as: WTF = What The Fyk? Fyk’s alleged injury has no connection whatsoever to any conduct by the United States, the only defendant in this lawsuit. The Supreme Court denied cert.
The law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld has lost its bid to dismiss four of five counterclaims filed by the legal technology company Xcential Legislative Technologies in a lawsuit over ownership rights to legislation-drafting software that each side says was its idea. Superior Court Judge Juliet J. McKenna disagreed.
We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “So They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did. What we offer are explanatory insights into judges’ rulings.” 31, 2021.
Fearing overseas defendants will abscond with ill-gotten gains if served with a lawsuit, plaintiffs seek an ex parte temporary restraining order (“TRO”) to freeze funds held by online merchants, then follow up with a request for a preliminary injunction. The defendant sold the flag below it. ” [note: Jones refers to Patrick M.
Tim Boucher objects to the mischaracterization of his work in authors’ copyright claim Thomas Claburn INTERVIEW Tim Boucher, a Canadian artist, author, and AI activist, sent a letter to the San Francisco judge overseeing an authors’ lawsuit against AI firm Anthropic to object to the way the legal filing characterizes his work.
Invoking the law, he sought an injunction to restore his deactivated accounts, remove all account restrictions, and get his (self-represented) attorneys’ fees. Indeed, As a practicing attorney, Davis is more sophisticated than many of the individual consumers against whom forum-selection clauses are regularly enforced.
Pre/Dicta, which launched within just a few days of Gavelytics’ closure, claims to predict how a judge will rule on a motion to dismiss in federal with an accuracy rate of 86.7%. Later, he served as a trial attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice; general counsel to a Washington, D.C.
We have all heard about the lawsuit involving Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni. After all, one cannot simply turn over their phone to the Court and have a Judge read all the communications between parties. The post Ask Attorney Jennifer B: Are Text Messages Admissible in Divorce Court? Brandt at www.cozen.com.
District Judge Randolph Moss of the District of Columbia allowed two married former Jones Day associates to add a retaliation claim to their bias lawsuit over the firm’s parental leave policy. The retaliation claim is based on a firm press release about the lawsuit after it was filed. Don’t issue a press release!) .
The firm based its lawsuit on DoNotPay’s claims that it allows consumers to “[f]ight corporations, beat bureaucracy and sue anyone at the press of a button,” even though it is not licensed to practice law. District Chief Judge Nancy Rosenstengel. Another lawsuit alleging unauthorized practice of law by DoNotPay, Faridian v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content