Remove Article Remove Court Remove Defendant
article thumbnail

When a Copyright Owner Gets Only a $1,000 Judgment in Federal Court, They’re the Real Losers–McDermott v. KMC

Eric Goldman

The article included multiple photos of Sewell, including the photo in question , and the Post apparently liked the image so much that they used a portion of the photo as the background for the newspaper cover that day (see screenshot at right). The defendant, Kalita Mukul Creative, ran community-focused newsletters. Not willful.

Court 102
article thumbnail

SAD Scheme-Style Case Falls Apart When the Defendant Appears in Court—King Spider v. Pandabuy

Eric Goldman

Pandabuy initially no-showed in the case, so the court converted the TRO to a preliminary injunction. Pandabuy eventually showed up in court and explained how it operates more like a passive facilitator than a seller or manufacturer. This additional context prompted the court to dissolve the injunction. SAD Scheme Cases Suck.

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Judge Rejects SAD Scheme Joinder–Toyota v. Schedule A Defendants

Eric Goldman

Toyota brought a SAD Scheme case against 103 defendants before Judge Daniel in the Northern District of Illinois. If these justifications sound familiar, it’s because these are the generic rotely-made defendant-unspecific allegations that are copied and pasted into most SAD Scheme complaints. .” Seriously, Toyota?

article thumbnail

Section 230 and the First Amendment Curtail An Online Videogame Addiction Lawsuit–Angelilli v. Activision

Eric Goldman

The court summarizes the plaintiffs’ allegations: D.G. Seeking redress, Plaintiffs sued Defendants on the theory that their design decisions and failure to disclose the dangers of their products were the cause of D.G.s The court dismisses Roblox, Google, and Apple from the case. Plaintiffs further allege that D.G.s

Lawsuit 75
article thumbnail

Lessons Learned from 2024 and the Year Ahead in AI Litigation

Debevoise Data Blog

A look back at 2024 shows that plaintiffs are learning from the initial wave of cases filed against AI developers, and that plaintiffs are now adapting their claimsas well as the defendants they are suingto meet the shifting legal terrain. 1] Proving Defendants Use of Training Data Inputs.

article thumbnail

Journalists’ Lack of Harm Fatal to DMCA Claims Against AI Developer

Debevoise Data Blog

Among the DMCA’s provisions were Section 1202’s protections for CMI: identifying information about the source of the copyrighted work and its owner that is commonly attached to the work via a physical marking, such as a watermark, or in the metadata of file, and which also includes information like the name of an author on an online article.

article thumbnail

Amazon Must Defend “Yelp Law” Claim–Ramos v. Amazon

Eric Goldman

At this point, the plaintiffs are arguing that their claims belong in state court because their allegations are too weak to support Article III standing for federal court. The court also says Amazon’s permission to write reviews may conflict with the trademark restriction, another misreading.