This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
But the rise in dupes has brought a corresponding rise in dupe lawsuits, or at least lawsuits that offer up defendants’ or consumers’ use of the term “dupe” as evidence of confusing similarity or intent to deceive. But the caselaw makes clear that establishing acquired distinctiveness for trade dress features is more complicated.
26] The Office released its first report on July 31, 2024; it concluded that federal legislation was urgently needed to address the unauthorized distribution of digital replicas and provided recommendations for the contours of such a law. [27] Many uses, however, will fall somewhere in between. [2] In late May, she sued to be reinstated.
Instead, Hunley and Brauer filed a class-action lawsuit against Instagram, alleging that Instagram was vicariously liable for, or was liable for encouraging or contributing to, the alleged direct infringement by others, by providing an “embedding” tool that easily could be used to facilitate public display of their photos. 94-1476, at 159-60.
Based on my reading of the caselaw, the Fourth and Eighth Circuits broadly follow this approach. Based on my reading of lower court opinions, to date, courts in the Third Circuit also seem to follow the case-by-case approach. However, it was sometimes not as clear as the caselaw of other circuits.”
For any lawyer defending a client in a lawsuit, they require the ability to utilize a powerful tool in their arsenal–the motion to dismiss. By seeking to dismiss a case early in the litigation, you can potentially prevail without the trouble of full-blown discovery and a trial. This article is provided for informational purposes only.
In this article, we will cover some of the critical professional conduct rules that affect lawyers daily. That’s really empowering for my clients, that they feel that they can participate and take charge in managing their own cases.” A 2016 class action against a Chicago-based law firm demonstrates the gravity of a breach of this duty.
There was an article in May, which talked about how you were approaching YCN bots functionality. And we potentially contaminate caselaw. But when you’ve got a decentralized process, like common law, where you’ve got a circuit court in the foothills of Wisconsin with one judge and one local solicitor.
Lawyers and law firms are increasingly finding innovative ways to use technology to help clients. While law firm innovation is exciting, there are important considerations to keep in mind. In this article, we dig into law firm innovation, including its challenges and benefits.
There was an article in May, which talked about how you were approaching YCN bots functionality. And we potentially contaminate caselaw. But when you’ve got a decentralized process, like common law, where you’ve got a circuit court in the foothills of Wisconsin with one judge and one local solicitor.
Greg Lambert 24:19 Now, I know you did a test on and I think you posted it on Twitter, and wrote an article, a quick article about it this week, and where you did that where you gave it certain issues you and then you fed it and in more information and then said Alright, now that we have this, come back with x and it was just a process that you did.
To fully understand these conflicting views of the majority opinion, it is necessary to understand both the specific facts of the case and the history of the Supreme Court’s caselaw concerning the fair-use doctrine. Vanity Fair selected one of the illustrations to accompany its article, titled “Purple Fame.”
Legal blog posts follow one of three formats: the caselaw breakdown, evergreen analysis or future forecast. Here’s how to write a well-structured caselaw breakdown post. This article is mostly about style. The caselaw breakdown is the most common type of blog post, so we’ll use it as our example.
That increases the government’s ability, and specifically, in many cases, law enforcement ability to watch people, to watch list people, to bring the light weight of the criminal justice system and the carceral system down on people. And with that comes power, right? Matt] 13:00 That’s a great question.
By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa Last week, a federal judge in New York dismissed a lawsuit filed two-and-a-half years ago by then-former President Donald Trump against journalist Bob Woodward and his publisher, Simon & Schuster, over publication of The Trump Tapes: Bob Woodward’s Twenty Interviews with President Donald Trump. July 18, 2025).
This post focuses only on one corner of the lawsuit. Here is Eric Trump’s tweet: (Today, Twitter strips all metadata about the linked article other than the preview image. In 2020, there would have been more preview information of the linked article. The court says Section 230 protects these tweets.
In that filing the public statements and of these lawsuits, you saw, we found an increase in the dissents of Enforcement and Removal officers, which had the result of keeping more people detained. Professor Koulish ] 45:58 Yeah, I think the caselaw is pretty clear on that you go back to the Zadvydas decision of 2001.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content