Remove 2025 Remove Defendant Remove Law
article thumbnail

SAD Scheme-Style Case Falls Apart When the Defendant Appears in Court—King Spider v. Pandabuy

Eric Goldman

Redbubble and the Sunfrog cases because the defendants in those cases exhibited sufficiently more indicia of controland presented more opportunity for consumer confusion by using their own tags and labels. Schedule A Defendants Judge Rejects SAD Scheme JoinderToyota v. The court distinguishes Atari v. the $17M asset freeze).

article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit Takes a Wrecking Ball to Internet Personal Jurisdiction Law–Briskin v. Shopify

Eric Goldman

” Purposeful availment can occur if a “defendant (1) commit[s] an intentional act, that is (2) expressly aimed at the forum state, and (3) which causes harm that the defendant knows will be suffered in the forum state.” The first factor is sometimes further subdivided into three subfactors reflecting the Calder v.

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Conflict Checking in 2025: How Legal Teams Avoid Ethical Disasters

MatterSuite

Imagine your law firm takes on a new corporate client, only to discover later that your team previously advised their competitor in a related case. Defend the Firm’s Reputation and Client Trust A single conflict oversight can irreparably damage a firm’s credibility. You worry about compliance gaps in your current process.

article thumbnail

First Amendment Doesn’t Apply to Descriptions of Content Moderation Practices–Bride v. Snap

Eric Goldman

So where exactly is the Ninth Circuit’s law on this topic? The defendant claimed that the First Amendment barred the lawsuit “because the claims would interfere with Defendant’s First Amendment discretion to choose its own content moderation policy,” citing the O’Handley district court case.

article thumbnail

Anthropic’s law firm throws Claude under the bus over citation errors in court filing–theregister.com

lennyesq

AI footnote fail triggers legal palmface in music copyright spat Thomas Claburn An attorney defending AI firm Anthropic in a copyright case brought by music publishers apologized to the court on Thursday for citation errors that slipped into a filing after using the biz’s own AI tool, Claude, to format references.

Court 61
article thumbnail

Leaky TOS Formation = No TOS Formation–Snyder v. G6

Eric Goldman

G6 invoked the TOS, so G6 bore the burden of showing that the plaintiff agreed to it: Defendant has failed to provide adequate evidence to establish which version of the sign-up page Plaintiff used when she signed up for her Motel 6 account. G6 Hospitality LLC , 2025 WL 1254382 (C.D. Case Citation : Snyder v.

article thumbnail

Lessons Learned from 2024 and the Year Ahead in AI Litigation

Debevoise Data Blog

Despite the busy 2024 litigation year against companies offering AI platforms in 2024, significant intellectual property questions remain unanswered as the calendar turns to 2025. 2025 may bring some clarity to the legal status of AI, including through highly anticipated guidance from the U.S.