Eric Goldman

APRIL 8, 2025

However, the case fell apart on further proceedings when the court reconsidered jurisdiction and joinder. It’s so typical that SAD Scheme cases can’t survive actual scrutiny, unlike the deferential reviews courts apply at the ex parte TRO stage. Sloppy or nefariousporque no los dos?

Defendant 52

Defendant Court Lawsuit State law 52

Eric Goldman

FEBRUARY 21, 2025

Invisible Narratives sought an ex parte TRO to prevent that from happening, which the court grants. The court relies on 512(f) as the basis of the TRO: “Invisible Narratives has presented evidence that Next Level was neither the original creator of Skibidi Toilet nor the lawful copyright owner of Skibidi Toilet characters.

Intellectual Property 40

Intellectual Property Court Hearing State law 40

Eric Goldman

JANUARY 11, 2025

The court summarizes the facts: The two videos at issue comprise excerpts from Lakeway City Council meetings and a presentation Kilgore gave as mayor to Lakeway residents, sitting at a desk in front of United States and Texas flags. 2025 WL 35245 (D. Kilgore , 2024 WL 5295080 (W.D. Channel 781 News v. Alper Automotive v.

Court 40

Court Judge Defendant Case predictions 40

Inside Privacy

FEBRUARY 1, 2024

Note that the data localization prohibition in this Regulation applies to individual EU Member States’ laws; it does not preclude the EU from implementing data localization requirements.

Intellectual Property 72

Intellectual Property State law Court Compliance 72

Debevoise Data Blog

MAY 23, 2022

Like other state privacy laws, the CTPA contains a number of entity-based and data-based exemptions, including financial institutions covered by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, national securities associations that are registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and data regulated by the Fair Credit Reporting Act, among other exemptions.

Law 40

Law Law Compliance Attorney 40

Percipient

JULY 1, 2025

Civil Subpoenas: These are issued by courts upon the request of parties involved in civil litigation. United States , Misc. 2025) (Noting that [the SCA] provides a sliding scale of protections and data requests by subpoena “require a service provider to disclose certain basic subscriber information and content.”)

Compliance 52

Compliance Litigator Litigation Failure-to-appear 52

Eric Goldman

JUNE 26, 2025

” The court previously described the core allegations: The plaintiffs allege that Onision “ran several YouTube channels” that “targeted minor audiences” and allowed Onision to “groom and lure underage girls.” The court previously dismissed the case on Section 230 grounds and rejected the FOSTA workaround.

Lawsuit 93

Lawsuit Litigator Litigation Court 93

Richmond Journal of Law and Technology

APRIL 12, 2025

Unbeknownst to most, however, is that 167 law enforcement agencies across Virginia are now using public-facing surveillance technology such as Automatic License Plate Readers (“ALPR”) and gunshot listening devices. [1] In 2022, it was discovered that state law enforcement agencies had begun putting up ALPRs on state roadways. [15]

Judge 52

Judge Lawsuit Time-tracking Court 52

Eric Goldman

FEBRUARY 18, 2025

The district court dismissed the case. The Ninth Circuit affirms every point of the district court’s decision. The panel summarizes: “Because Does state law claims necessarily implicate Grindrs role as a publisher of third-party content, 230 bars those claims. .” Will a Ninth Circuit panel agree?

Lawsuit 64

Lawsuit Failure-to-appear Defendant Court 64

Richmond Journal of Law and Technology

MARCH 7, 2025

By: Evan Lees In 2014, the Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Riley v. California , mandating that law enforcement obtain a warrant before searching digital information and underscoring the critical need for privacy protections in the digital age. [1] The Supreme Court Must Step In., 1149, 1193–94 (2021). [17]

Compliance 52

Compliance Data protection Federal law Court 52

Eric Goldman

MAY 15, 2025

” The court summarizes: “In response to the Garniers numerous critical and often repetitive comments on the Trustees social media pages, the Trustees deleted or hid the Garniers comments. Prior blog posts on the district court and Ninth Circuit rulings. Freed and remanded this case for reconsideration.

Court 52

Court Lawsuit State law Attorney 52

Eric Goldman

FEBRUARY 8, 2025

A prior ruling summarized the facts the court describes as “harrowing”: In April 2022, Defendant Bendjy Charles (Charles) and Romelus raped Plaintiff. 2025 WL 336741 (S.D. 30, 2025) MORE ON DOE V. The court denied summary judgment for both sides, likely sending this case to trial. Fenix International, Ltd.

Defendant 59

Defendant Lawsuit Judge Court 59

Eric Goldman

MAY 1, 2025

2025 WL 1249157 (D. April 29, 2025) This is a pro se/in pro per case. Indeed, there is nothing available to the Court demonstrating the private entities Plaintiff sues could meet this standard. 2025 WL 1237550 (N.D. April 28, 2025) Another pro se/in pro per case. The court summarizes: Plaintiff Steven M.

Court 72

Court Lawsuit Defendant Litigator 72

Eric Goldman

MAY 26, 2025

2025 WL 1314179 (N.D. May 6, 2025) Prior blog posts ( 1 , 2 ). The court says this isn’t a dispositive issue because “Judge Coogler would have come to the conclusion that Defendants were content providers and thus not entitled to immunity under Section 230 even if he had not considered Anderson.” TikTok ruling.

Defendant 55

Defendant Failure-to-appear Court Judge 55

Eric Goldman

DECEMBER 23, 2024

To the extent that courts have acknowledged this issue, they have presumed that everyone knew Backpage was providing illegal services to sex traffickers. So for purposes of a motion to dismiss, courts can simply assume the upstream violations. Add Section 230 into the mix and tertiary liability looks even weirder.

Defendant 59

Defendant Court Lawsuit Judge 59