This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
This engaging, practical session explores how to transform your legal writing using the Betty Flowers framework, a four-stage writing process that every attorney should know: Madman, Architect, Carpenter, and Judge. PT on Friday, July 25th, 2025. Gutierrez of the United States District Court for the Central District of California.
What really happened was that the judge gave a jury instruction that confused the hell out of the jury, and so the jury returned a meaningless and indefensible verdict, one that was certain to be appealed. But this court says, not so. I blame this result on this courts definition of technological harm.
Candidate, 2025 No one wants to be left holding the bag after a break-in, but for chief information security officers (CISOs), the risk of liability is ever-present. District Court for the Southern District of New York suggests that CISOs might be outside of point-blank range. By Gaurav Lalsinghani, J.D.
The DOJ amended the complaint in January 2025 to include the names of six major landlords who participated in this scheme with RealPage. Judge Mehta ruled that Google had illegally maintained monopoly power through exclusive agreements that prevented competition. The recent decision in U.S.
For lawyers, this is an opportunity to provide more complex legal services in 2025. Supreme Court rulings have found that the First, Third, Fourth, and Fifth amendments of the Constitution contain a right to privacy. It was in 1917 that a judge ruled there were protections for the contents of sealed mail. Note the dates.
Pandabuy initially no-showed in the case, so the court converted the TRO to a preliminary injunction. Pandabuy eventually showed up in court and explained how it operates more like a passive facilitator than a seller or manufacturer. This additional context prompted the court to dissolve the injunction. SAD Scheme Cases Suck.
Extensively citing Chabolla , the court rejects the arbitration request. The court says Plex’s relationship context cuts against TOS formation. The court’s treatment of the sign-up screen’s call-to-action is perplexing (no pun intended). Plex offers free video streaming.
Talk about court red-handed Thomas Claburn Demonstrating yet again that uncritically trusting the output of generative AI is dangerous, attorneys involved in a product liability lawsuit have apologized to the presiding judge for submitting documents that cite non-existent legal cases.
Brett Trout On April 18, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (the main court for resolving patent issues) issued a significant decision in Recentive Analytics, Inc. The Court’s Analysis Applying the two-step framework from Alice Corp. Fox Corp. (No.
The Illinois Supreme Court has released its new policy on generative AI use in courts , effective January 1, 2025. Second, the policy maintains that judges and attorneys remain fully accountable for their work product, regardless of the technology used.
The defendant claimed that the First Amendment barred the lawsuit “because the claims would interfere with Defendant’s First Amendment discretion to choose its own content moderation policy,” citing the O’Handley district court case. The court disagrees. 2025 WL 819567 (C.D. ” What? ” What?
The paper also sued because the county barred county employees from talking to reporters, but the court says this equal protection claim is duplicative of the retaliation one. BRIEF / February 25, 2025 Read the ruling here. BINGHAMTON, N.Y.
The court dismisses the case entirely with leave to amend. The court responds: “Plaintiffs do not clearly identify the ‘product’ at issue or the ‘design defect’ it allegedly contains.” ” The court responds: Many of the statements simply describe what content is allowed on the platforms.
The court summarizes the case: Rodney Woodland, a freelance artist and model, posts semi-naked photographs of himself in different poses on Instagram. The court displayed all of the photos side-by-side, so of course we’re going to look at them. I guess that makes me old-school. So I think this is a SFW post.
The court summarizes the plaintiffs’ allegations: D.G. The court dismisses Roblox, Google, and Apple from the case. The Court has no trouble concluding that Roblox Corp. The Court has no trouble concluding that Roblox Corp. In a footnote, the court adds: “Plaintiffs argue that they seek to hold Roblox Corp.
We’ve analyzed the latest family law statistics to uncover key trends in divorce outcomes, custody arrangements, and court decisions that impact your daily practice. Family courts are handling diverse caseloads. Of the 66 million cases handled by state courts each year, nearly 3.8 million are family law cases.
Shopify said California courts lack personal jurisdiction over it. The district court agreed with Shopify, as did a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit. The en banc court issues a total of four opinions, and collectively they show Shopify was never close.
A recent Axios article (June 4, 2025) reminds us that, despite all the hype, AI large language models (LLMs) are still prone to hallucinations. These are moments when AI tools confidently serve up false or fabricated information, citations, or even entire legal precedents listing real courts, judges and lawyers … but completely made up!
To dispose of various motions, the court must construe the statutory term “social media platform.” The court recognizes this drafting flaw: the text of the social media platform definition is broad. –the court sides with the statutory text and its massively overbroad definition. 230(e)(3).
The court credits Robinsons allegations that Roblox employees reviewed and approved Binello’s upload of Robinson’s copyrighted work, created a copy of that work, and stored that copy on the Roblox server. On this basis, the court distinguished VHT v. This court didnt do that. Robinson alleges that it was.
As we previewed in our 2024 AI year in review , one of the big areas to watch in 2025 will be how much discovery courts are prepared to order into the inner workings of AI companies, especially in the face of arguments that discovery would reveal trade secrets or would be overbroad in cases based on specific claimed works. OpenAI, Inc.
The court summarizes: Plaintiff does not argue that Modlily appears in the product name or description of these listings, or anywhere on the webpage itself. Echoing Patmont, the court said the “post-domain path of a URL, however, does not typically signify source. Patmont was followed by Interactive Products Corp.
Despite the busy 2024 litigation year against companies offering AI platforms in 2024, significant intellectual property questions remain unanswered as the calendar turns to 2025. 2025 may bring some clarity to the legal status of AI, including through highly anticipated guidance from the U.S.
The court says that Viral DRM’s exclusive “management” rights is not the same as ownership or an exclusive license to the copyright. The court says that Viral DRM doesn’t have standing to enforce the copyright. 2025 WL 660250 (N.D. 28, 2025) Prior Blog Posts on the SAD Scheme Another N.D.
Meta Platforms (“Meta” ), the court similarly concluded that training an AI was fair use of copyrighted (and even pirated) works—but strongly suggested the outcome may have been different on a better-developed record. Just one day later, on June 25, 2025, Judge Chhabria handed down a decision in Meta , which cited Anthropic.
If youd like to hear from cutting-edge speakers on the movement toward trauma-informed justice and other relevant topics in the legal industry, be sure to register for ClioCon 2025. Many trauma-informed practices have already been implemented in court systems that deal with sensitive populations, such as juveniles or military veterans.
The district court dismisses some of GM’s claims but allows others to proceed. Defamation The court says that GM may proceed with a per se defamation claim based on the takedown notices’ alleged injury to its business reputation. (For 2025 WL 1226629 (S.D.N.Y. For more on the nomenclature problem, see Prof.
This court, in contrast, treats the copyrightability of prices as the easy question I always thought it should be: The only way to express the price of a particular diamond or type of diamond is with the specific number corresponding to that price. Note: the court surely meant Nivoda, not Rapaport. May 2, 2025).
As the first quarter of 2025 draws to a close and we look ahead to the spring, important changes to the Federal Rules of Evidence (FRE) regarding the use of AI in the courtroom are on the horizon. 7, 2025 ) , Tab 3A Report of the Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules (Dec. See Advisory Committee on Evidence Rules Agenda Book (Nov.
Palmer Chief Counsel, Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism and Adjunct Professor Comment on his posts with your two cents on anything from incomprehensible law language to AI ethics in law to the power of youth mentorshipwe bet hell comment back. Kevin is not alone in these sentiments.
2025 WL 961473 (W.D.N.Y. March 31, 2025) This case involves the service Joybuy, which listed items for sale in Walmart.coms marketplace. The court is unclear about how Joybuy operates, but it appears that Joybuy (via the entity JD) runs its own online marketplace. Omnia Studios Ltd. JD E-Commerce America Ltd.,
The court refuses Temu’s preliminary injunction request. This opinion suggests this judge would have zero interest in enjoining rightsowners from this practice. Shein Technology LLC , 2025 WL 445187 (D.C.D.C. Day to Day Imports * Court Mistakenly Thinks Copyright Owners Have a Duty to Police InfringementSunny Factory v.
JustAnswers’ TOS formation process was rejected in the California state courts. It fares no better in federal court. That seems likely to ensure a steady stream of appeals to the Ninth Circuit. * * * The court classifies all of the screens below as sign-in-wraps. Case Citation : Godun v. JustAnswer LLC , No.
The court takes two elements off the table immediately: “Plaintiffs do not contest that MMA was a user of an interactive computer service, nor that MMA received the Kane Email from another information content provider.” USI Insurance Services, LLC , 2025 WL 711113 (N.D. This turns into an easy Section 230 dismissal.
The webinar demonstrated how tools like Nextpoint can transform case preparation from disconnected documents and transcripts into an integrated story that resonates with judges and juries alike. As Anand noted, “People are just used to watching people appear remotely now.” Privacy Policy | Terms of Use 888.929.NEXT
As the judge says resignedly, “Taking these provisions directly from a law enacted in the United Kingdom, the California Legislature left it to the courts to pass the CAADCA through the filter of our First Amendment.” Unsurprisingly, on remand, the district court declared the rest unconstitutional.
14, 2024) A magistrate judge recommends sending a 512(f) case to trial. The court summarizes the facts: The two videos at issue comprise excerpts from Lakeway City Council meetings and a presentation Kilgore gave as mayor to Lakeway residents, sitting at a desk in front of United States and Texas flags. 2025 WL 35245 (D.
Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. While we are happy to lead an industry disruption, we welcome new competition, which we believe will help accelerate adoption of new AI-powered eDiscovery technologies by courts, law firms, and other stakeholders.
They’re looking for a strategic ally—someone who can: Analyze complex financial data and explain it clearly Prepare credible, courtroom-ready reports Hold up under deposition and cross-examination Communicate findings persuasively to non-experts (including judges and juries) Your marketing should reflect an understanding of their world.
The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism is pleased to announce that Chief Counsel Mark C. The Task Force falls under the Strategic Goal of Fair, Timely, and Efficient Courts. “AI Palmer previously served on an IJC Task Force that supported the development of the Illinois Court’s new website.
Jack also announced exciting new Clio features for 2025, including automated workflows, custom reporting, and new payment methods. To cap off his exhilarating keynote, Jack revealed that ClioCon 2025 will take place in Boston, Massachusetts. Secure your tickets for ClioCon 2025 today!
The legal tech industry is experiencing significant growth and innovation, and Gartner forecasts that 12 percent of in-house legal budgets will be dedicated to legal tech by 2025. 4 Machine Learning (ML) Initially used primarily for billing and invoicing, ML is now used to analyze vast quantities of court data to determine the next steps.
Weve gathered the best highlights with those whove walked the halls of Congress and presided over our nations highest courts because their insights dont just shape policies and decisions; they offer valuable lessons for anyone navigating the complexities of law, leadership, and life itself. Takeaways from Justices Chief Justice Nathan L.
In September, the court enjoined part of the law. Now, the court enjoins much of the rest. ” Paxton argued that the Fifth Circuit rejected strict scrutiny in the NetChoice decision , to which the judge responds that the Supreme Court nuked the 5th Circuit NetChoice decision on appeal. .” See CCIA v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content