Debevoise Data Blog

JANUARY 25, 2024

Nevertheless, when considering the appropriateness of protective measures, the obligation rests on the data controller to prove that they met the required standard. The rulings arose at the request of both the German and Lithuanian courts, following local administrative fines. The Court ruled that: “Scoring” (i.e.,

Data protection 40

Data protection Court e-records Compliance 40

Clio

OCTOBER 8, 2024

Jack also announced exciting new Clio features for 2025, including automated workflows, custom reporting, and new payment methods. To cap off his exhilarating keynote, Jack revealed that ClioCon 2025 will take place in Boston, Massachusetts. Secure your tickets for ClioCon 2025 today!

Time-tracking 59

Time-tracking Judge Law firm Data protection 59

Inside Privacy

FEBRUARY 1, 2024

Note that the data localization prohibition in this Regulation applies to individual EU Member States’ laws; it does not preclude the EU from implementing data localization requirements. The restrictions on transfers of non-personal data appear to serve two main purposes. X (Recent Council versions remove this obligation.)

Intellectual Property 72

Intellectual Property State law Court Compliance 72

Debevoise Data Blog

MAY 23, 2022

This contrasts with the VCDPA’s and the UCPA’s definition of “sale,” which is limited to an exchange of personal data for only monetary consideration. The CTPA bolsters opt-out rights by requiring controllers to recognize a global opt-out preference by January 1, 2025. CTPA § 6(e)(1)(A)(ii). CTPA § 11(b).

Law 40

Law Law Compliance Attorney 40

Eric Goldman

APRIL 28, 2023

If passed, the bill goes into effect July 1, 2024 with the first round of DPIAs due July 1, 2025. Among their targets were the Data Protection Impact Assessment requirements, which NetChoice argued amounted to prior restraint and compelled speech. The bill is currently pending approval by both chambers.

Data protection 133

Data protection Court Hearing Judge 133

Richmond Journal of Law and Technology

MARCH 16, 2025

2] Bookmakers—teams comprised of sports experts, analysts, and statisticians—set the initial betting odds for the public, relying on complex mathematical calculations, statistical models, and historical data. [3] billion between 2025 to 2029 thanks to AI. [10] 15] As such, AI can inadvertently leak users’ private data. [16]

Time-tracking 52

Time-tracking Data protection Analytics Court 52

Richmond Journal of Law and Technology

MARCH 7, 2025

By: Evan Lees In 2014, the Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling in Riley v. California , mandating that law enforcement obtain a warrant before searching digital information and underscoring the critical need for privacy protections in the digital age. [1] The Supreme Court Must Step In., 1149, 1193–94 (2021). [17]

Compliance 52

Compliance Data protection Federal law Court 52

Eric Goldman

MAY 26, 2025

2025 WL 1314179 (N.D. May 6, 2025) Prior blog posts ( 1 , 2 ). The court says this isn’t a dispositive issue because “Judge Coogler would have come to the conclusion that Defendants were content providers and thus not entitled to immunity under Section 230 even if he had not considered Anderson.” TikTok ruling.

Defendant 57

Defendant Failure-to-appear Court Judge 57

Debevoise Data Blog

JANUARY 16, 2025

Alleged violators may seek additional judicial review in federal district court. The Final Rule takes effect 90 days after publication in the Federal Register, which is expected for January 8, 2025, although certain compliance requirements will not take effect until 270 days following publication.

Compliance 52

Compliance Due diligence e-records Time-tracking 52