This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectual property rights. one (atypical) case filed in 2024, Raw Story Media, Inc.
Voting is now closed and your votes have been tallied to decide the 15 legal tech startups that will get to participate as finalists in the eighth-annual Startup Alley at ABA TECHSHOW 2024, taking place Feb. From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 25, which we posted on Dec.
Help pick the 15 legal tech startups that will get to compete at the eighth-annual Startup Alley at ABA TECHSHOW 2024. 14-17, 2024, in Chicago. Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. Please review them. DEADLINE FOR VOTING IS FRIDAY, DEC.
” [The $2,500 amount was suggested by the presiding judge at a settlement conference, which the defendant turned into an offer of judgment.] However we get there, the overall litigation enterprise here makes no economic sense. 2024 WL 4799751 (E.D.N.Y. On the other hand, the plaintiff never sent a C&D.
Another example of procedural justice is alternative dispute resolution (ADR) processes, such as mediation, arbitration, and neutral evaluation, which allow litigants to use the assistance of a neutral third party to help resolve a legal dispute in a more collaborative space. What are the 4 pillars of procedural justice?
At the Committees last meeting in November 2024, it agreed to develop a formal proposal for a new rule which, if adopted, would become Rule 707 of the FRE that would require federal courts to apply Rule 702s standards to machine-generated evidence. 1, 2024), at 3 (Committee Dec. District Judge Edgardo Ramos of the U.S.
Yet, the SAD Scheme jurisprudential distortion field worked its magic once again, and the judge rejected their legitimate pushback. It is baffling to see how acquiescent judges can be when it comes to obvious deficiencies of the SAD Scheme. The judge subsequently held the marketplaces in contempt for violating the injunction.
Developers of artificial intelligence (“AI”) systems notched a victory last week when a federal judge dismissed claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) premised on the use of copyrighted works in AI training data, holding that the plaintiffs had failed to show any concrete harm and therefore lacked standing to bring their claims.
And the legal industry is taking notice: according to the American Bar Associations 2024 Legal Technology Survey Report , 47% of firms used legal analytics in the previous year. Further insights could be gleaned based on the type of case, jurisdiction, judge, or even opposing counsel. The result?
This case got assigned to Judge Alsup’s courtroom. I previously summarized Judge Alsup’s modus operandi about motions to dismiss: Judge Alsup gives the benefit of the doubt to plaintiffs on motions to dismiss, only to hammer them on summary judgment if their evidence doesn’t hold up to scrutiny.
Welcome to the first of a few special Legal Week 2024 edition episodes of “The Geek in Review,” where we looked for innovative and creative ideas on the road and recorded live from the bustling environment of the 2024 Legal Week conference in New York. I thought he was still in the judge, but apparently he’s not. Cool, cool.
After a couple of defendants showed up, the judge denied a TRO extension because of the possible lack of merit in the plaintiff’s infringement allegations. In other words, the plaintiff can completely abuse their litigation but get more chances. Then, the case fell apart. That’s unacceptable. Emoji GmbH v.
” We might expect the judge to push on these vague and conclusory allegations and demand specifics. Instead, the judge accepts these allegations as good enough to survive the motion to dismiss. This sounds like the recipe for an infinite litigation machine. Exactly what did Facebook do? Note: the court cites Facebook v.
As we previewed in our 2024 AI year in review , one of the big areas to watch in 2025 will be how much discovery courts are prepared to order into the inner workings of AI companies, especially in the face of arguments that discovery would reveal trade secrets or would be overbroad in cases based on specific claimed works. What Happened?
It was in 1917 that a judge ruled there were protections for the contents of sealed mail. Seven more states passed such laws in 2024. Although there was a federal law proposed in 2024 that would impose some comprehensive standards, this has yet to be passed by Congress. go back further than one might think.
It’s a nice legal trick if a website can get a judge to adopt it. I wouldn’t expect many other judges to do so, and I wouldn’t be surprised if this ruling gets reversed on appeal. That put their litigation team in the position of needing to make a hail-mary argument of “enforceable browsewrap.”
Rich was sworn in as the Chicago Bar Association’s 2023 – 2024 Secretary at the organization’s Annual Meeting on June 29, 2023. The Annual Meeting celebrated the CBA’s 150 th anniversary, recognized the outgoing 2022 – 2023 officers and board members, and welcomed the 2023 – 2024 officers and board members. In addition to Ms.
Instead, a Buffalo-based New York trial judge rejected the motion to dismiss. Some judges recognize that product design theory just rearticulates claims based on third-party content, as it does here because any radicalizing content came from third-parties, not the social media services themselves. Section 230. Craigslist and Godwin v.
The parties then filed renewed motions for summary judgment in October 2024. Likening the process of crafting headnotes to that of a sculptor chiseling through marble, Judge Bibas wrote that a sculptor creates a sculpture by choosing what to cut away and what to leave in place. some creative spark. Feist Publications, Inc. 340 (1991).
head nod to Judge Friendly ). * * * The plaintiff licenses a photo database to grocery stores for $12k/yr. A liberal interpretation of the Copyright Act, therefore, could open the floodgates to endless litigation. 12, 2024) Selected Posts on Liability for Retweeting * Retweets ≠ Endorsements (As a Matter of Law)–Flynn v.
Judith Sheindlin (Judge Judy, 1942 to Present): Known as a household name, Judge Judy has been a trailblazer in the legal world. She is an American court-show arbitrator, media personality, television producer, philanthropist, and former prosecutor and Manhattan family court judge. Connect with Margaret Grisdela on LinkedIn.
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Whether it is by accident or because of who he is, Judge Edward Chen of the Northern District of California has a way of finding himself at the center of the most important cases in the world of web scraping. 2024 WL 251406 (N.D. There were a few steps in Judge Chen’s reasoning. Bright Data Ltd.
I’m not sure if Alexander is eligible for a 505 fee shift; but with zero damages awarded, I can’t imagine a judge would grant it. If not, then Alexander will come up completely dry after years of costly litigation. I don’t know if Alexander is still eligible for an injunction. Case Citation : Alexander v.
CDT on Thursday, April 18, 2024. Early bird pricing of $30 per ticket will be available through Friday, March 15, 2024, when the price will increase to $50 per ticket. The conference will be held virtually from 12 – 4:30 p.m. Tickets are limited. To learn more, visit 2Civility.org and follow us on social media.
After 8 years of litigation, the case ends on essentially a procedural technicality (an important one, but still…). 2024 WL 3331649 (N.D. July 8, 2024) Prior Blog Posts: * More Thoughts about the SCOTUS Twitter and Google Rulings * The Internet Survives SCOTUS Review (This Time)–Twitter v. Case Citation : Gonzalez v.
My previous summary of this litigation campaign: His lawsuit against Facebook was dashed by Section 230 in the district court. The judges response might be characterized as: WTF = What The Fyk? Fyk argued that the law regarding anticompetitive animus had changed during his 6-year-long litigation quest, citing the Enigma v.
On March 1, 2024, our collective efforts on this project — the Caselaw Access Project — culminated in the full, unrestricted release of nearly 7 million U.S. Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. Why Even Do This Project?
December 12, 2023 – HOUSTON—ALM/Law.com has named CloudNine a finalist in their Legalweek Leader in Tech Law 2024 Award program for Best Emerging Tech (Non-AI). The platform is built with the litigation lifecycle in mind, with the full processing, analysis, review, and production incorporated into the technology.
For instance, machine learning can predict litigation risks based on similar cases, identify trends that might impact a client, or flag unusual clauses in contracts that might need extra attention. Its particularly useful for litigation teams looking to analyze case trends, predict outcomes, and gain insights into opposing counsel or judges.
By Rick Clark The Future Lawyer 2024 Conference was held in Boston, MA, and hosted by Ropes & Gray LLP in their Prudential Tower offices. Kirk highlighted that Gen AI is set to revolutionize budgeting and staffing in litigation, particularly in document review, which constitutes up to 80% of litigation costs.
I’d love to see an accounting of the time and money the parties have spent on this litigation. Gutman , 2024 WL 172609 (2d Cir. 17, 2024) Selected Related Posts : Who Owns Social Media Accounts? Case citation : JLM Couture, Inc.
Voting is now closed and your votes have been tallied to decide the 15 legal tech startups that will get to participate as finalists in the eighth-annual Startup Alley at ABA TECHSHOW 2024, taking place Feb. From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 25, which we posted on Dec.
The Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism is pleased to announce that Executive Director Erika Harold is a 2024 recipient of the Earl B. Harold will be presented with the award at the 2024 Dickerson Award Luncheon on February 15, 2024, at the Union League Club in Chicago. The award honors the late Earl B.
The plaintiffs lost al of the framing cases then, but here we are in 2024, still litigating framing cases. It was an audaciously mockable pivot…and yet, the district court judge shockingly bought the argument. In other words, the district court judge was imprecise about exactly what chattel was being trespassed.
Happening in Grand Ballroom EF, the 15 startups will face off in a bracketed pitch competition – judged by TECHSHOW attendees – to pick the most innovative startup. Ai.Law Ai.Law provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. It includes precise links to the relevant parts of the source docs.
Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism Executive Director Erika Harold was selected as a member of the teaching faculty for Harvard Law School’s Winter 2024 Trial Advocacy Workshop (TAW). Prior to joining the Commission, Harold was a commercial and civil litigation attorney at Meyer Capel, P.C.
In a November ruling, a magistrate judge notes that the lawsuit appears to be the first of its kindone in which a social media influencer accuses another influencer of (among other things) copyright infringement based on the similarities between their posts that promote the same products. Sydney Nicole LLC v.
for almost 50 years and were designed to assess the job performance of judges. All JPE programs share the goal of helping judges improve at their jobs. The project kicked off with a survey of 658 judges in eight states with JPE programs to solicit judges’ perspectives on the value and administration of JPE in their states.
Voting is now closed and your votes have been tallied to decide the 15 legal tech startups that will get to participate as finalists in the eighth-annual Startup Alley at ABA TECHSHOW 2024, taking place Feb. From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 25, which we posted on Dec.
On July 4, 2023, a federal judge declared FREEDOM from government censorship of Internet services. Shockingly, the judge ordered the executive branch to stop talking to Internet services about certain issues. The line between the productive and condemnable government engagement is murky and fluid. 3) Supreme Court dodges Section 230.
If I were the lower court judge, seeing Philpot taking this case on appeal for a $3 article rather than working towards a reasonable settlement, there is no way I would award him attorneys’ fees. 6, 2024) The post Fourth Circuit Issues a Bummer Fair Use Ruling–Philpot v. Case citation : Philpot v. 21-2021 (4th Cir.
Courtroom Insight has been aggregating data on professionals (lawyers, arbitrators, judges and experts) as well as a suite of partnership alliances. Adam Pollet, a Securities Enforcement and Litigation Partner at Eversheds Sutherland, explained his firm’s rationale for making the purchase. I’ve wanted a tool like this for years.
Courtroom Insight has been aggregating data on professionals (lawyers, arbitrators, judges and experts) as well as a suite of partnership alliances. Adam Pollet, a Securities Enforcement and Litigation Partner at Eversheds Sutherland, explained his firm’s rationale for making the purchase. I’ve wanted a tool like this for years.
Voting is open to lawyers, legal support staff, judges, and in-house counsel until December 15, 2023 through the 2024 “Best of” Awards online survey. Following a period of analysis based on votes and feedback from the National Law Journal community, the top three in each category will be published in the April 2024 issue.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content