This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Recently, the companys aggressive enforcement of its intellectualproperty (IP) has taken center stage, with high-profile lawsuits targeting game modders, emulator developers, and companies like Pocketpair, the creators of Palworld. The lawsuit seeks damages and an injunction against the games continued distribution?
Candidate, 2027 The recent boom in generative AI technology has been hampered by accusations that AI training sets violate intellectualproperty laws. Yet the EU already codified an opt-out approach to AI training in 2024, as part of their AI Act , via the extension of an opt-out provision originally intended for text-and-datamining.
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectualproperty rights. 1] Proving Defendants Use of Training Data Inputs.
After many rounds of motions to dismiss, intellectualproperty cases against AI developers are moving into the discovery phase. Defendants denied the allegations and stated that to the extent any copying of copyrighted works occurred, that copying constituted fair use. [2] OpenAI, Inc. cases since last February). [1] 2/16/24).
Help pick the 15 legal tech startups that will get to compete at the eighth-annual Startup Alley at ABA TECHSHOW 2024. 14-17, 2024, in Chicago. This release is scheduled for January 2024. Our goal is to serve 2-4 cases per month by the end of 2024, with the projected revenue of $2-4M/year. What problem do you solve?
24 CV 01514-CM, 2024 WL 4711729 (S.D.N.Y. Generally, the DMCA provided additional digital rights management (“DRM”) and copyright protections to aid rights holders in protecting their intellectualproperty assets by prohibiting the production and distribution of technology that attempts to circumvent DRM and the act of such circumvention.
The defendants sought to overturn the jury verdict. Fair Use Nature of Use “Defendants’ use of the tattoos was clearly commercial.” This was evident with Defendants’ “Create-A-Superstar” feature which enabled a user to take the tattoos and apply them to their own custom wrestler avatar. ” Really?
The parties then filed renewed motions for summary judgment in October 2024. Defendants could have more success on the first fair use factor, purpose and character, in the context of a generative AI model. Defendants, on the other hand, will argue that a generative AI chatbot is not a substitute for a novel, song or film.
.” While there’s no reason Section 230 couldn’t apply to digital items sold by the defendant, I don’t see how 230 can apply equally to offline physical items. Pixels.com, LLC , 2024 WL 885356 (W.D. March 1, 2024) Related posts * Atari’s Lawsuit Against a Print-on-Demand Service Fizzles Out–Atari v.
On October 16, 2024, the New York Department of Financial Services (the “NYDFS”) issued an Industry Letter providing guidance on assessing cybersecurity risks associated with the use of AI (the “Guidance”) under the existing 23 NYCRR Part 500 (“Part 500” or “Cybersecurity Regulation”) framework.
Help pick the 15 legal tech startups that will get to compete at the eighth-annual Startup Alley at ABA TECHSHOW 2024. 14-17, 2024, in Chicago. This release is scheduled for January 2024. Our goal is to serve 2-4 cases per month by the end of 2024, with the projected revenue of $2-4M/year. What problem do you solve?
when a plaintiff’s claimed interest in protecting his intellectualproperty rights in a particular work has been repeatedly found by federal courts to be of a bad faith nature, it is entirely appropriate that courts in subsequent actions consider this fact in making their rulings. .” Kiffin , 2024 WL 5125159 (N.D.
Ryan alleged the following unjust enrichment: “X is wrongfully deriving and retaining a benefit from Ryans intellectualproperty because it still generates advertising revenue from ads that continue to run alongside Ryans suspended accounts even though Ryan cannot himself access his accounts or the content they hosted.”
Facebook defended on Section 230. Publicity rights claims should be “intellectualproperty” claims in the Third Circuit per the Hepp v. TikTok ruling as the end of Section 230 because plaintiffs can always claim that they are suing based on the defendant’s “expressive activities.”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content