Legal Tech Monitor

OCTOBER 27, 2023

After just a couple of years at the ARDC—an entity charged by the Illinois Supreme Court with upholding the legal profession’s integrity in Illinois—Larkin began to realize he might have found the place where he could accomplish his mission. “As He was a gentleman when he appeared before the court,” Grogan said. “He

Court 52

Court Attorney Failure-to-appear Litigation 52

Debevoise Data Blog

NOVEMBER 4, 2024

The underlying failures alleged in the settlement occurred between 2018 and 2023. The settlement also underscores the need to provide a channel for personnel to escalate perceived compliance failures. The settlement also underscores the need to provide a channel for personnel to escalate perceived compliance failures.

Compliance 52

Compliance Failure-to-appear Lawsuit Court 52

Debevoise Data Blog

JULY 20, 2022

On July 8, 2022, the U.S. The DOJ’s announcement follows the court’s approval of a tentative settlement reached on April 27, 2022 by Aerojet and the whistleblower who filed the claims. The whistleblower claimed to have filed the action after his attempts to raise the issue through internal channels proved unsuccessful.

Failure-to-appear 40

Failure-to-appear Compliance Court Attorney 40

Eric Goldman

JANUARY 26, 2024

Viewing Heuberger’s comments in the light most favorable to Route, the Court concludes that at least some of Heuberger’s comments are not a “performance assessment of, or other similar analysis of,” Route’s services. Further, the disparagement agreement is not limited by common-law defamation requirements. * April 20, 2023).

Defendant 98

Defendant e-records Court Failure-to-appear 98

Richmond Journal of Law and Technology

NOVEMBER 23, 2023

12] Herzberg’s family sued Uber, the owner of the vehicle, but whether Uber or its programmers would have been found liable in civil court isn’t clear—the parties reached a confidential settlement. [13] 2] Ahead, a driver-operated car struck a pedestrian, throwing her into the Cruise’s path. If there is no driver, who is liable?

Lawsuit 52

Lawsuit Judge Court Failure-to-appear 52

Eric Goldman

MARCH 11, 2025

Thats the basis for a recent opinion from a Florida federal district court that could have major implications for online services CSAM detection and reporting practices. Now, however, a district court decision suggests that providers can no longer take it for granted that they wont face liability for reporting non-CSAM.

Lawsuit 52

Lawsuit Defendant Court Failure-to-appear 52

Eric Goldman

APRIL 17, 2025

The court summarizes: The plaintiffs commenced this action in connection with the death by suicide of 16 year old Chase Nasca on February 18, 2022 after he walked in front of a train. I infer that the procedural goal was to connect the TikTok claims to the related action against the railroad agency in New York, but I’m not sure.

Lawsuit 64

Lawsuit Defendant Failure-to-appear Court 64

Eric Goldman

SEPTEMBER 27, 2024

Having manufactured the requirement of that the claim must be based on “particular” content to trigger Section 230, the court says none of the claims do that. ” I’d love for the court to explain how blocking users from contacting each other on apps differs from “content moderation.”

Court 105

Court Lawsuit Judge Defendant 105

Eric Goldman

NOVEMBER 27, 2023

By guest blogger Lisa Ramsey , Professor of Law, University of San Diego School of Law The Supreme Court will likely hold in Elster that Section 2(c) is consistent with the First Amendment, but will it clarify how to balance trademark and free speech rights? After the Supreme Court granted cert in Vidal v. Tam (2017) and Iancu v.

Court 106

Court Law Law Failure-to-appear 106

Eric Goldman

MAY 26, 2025

The court says this isn’t a dispositive issue because “Judge Coogler would have come to the conclusion that Defendants were content providers and thus not entitled to immunity under Section 230 even if he had not considered Anderson.” I disagree strongly with this court’s assessment. TikTok ruling. Reddit, Inc.

Defendant 58

Defendant Failure-to-appear Court Judge 58

Eric Goldman

NOVEMBER 10, 2024

I’m still blogging Section 230 cases as I see them, even though these posts are likely to have only historical value. ] * * * The court summarizes the horrifying allegations: In April 2022, Defendant Bendjy Charles (“Charles”) and Romelus raped Plaintiff. The court dismisses OnlyFans per Section 230.

Defendant 117

Defendant Lawsuit Failure-to-appear Court 117