This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Nikes History of Defending Its Patents Nike is no stranger to intellectual property lawsuits. The sportswear giant has sued multiple competitors over its Flyknit technology, including: Adidas (2021) Nike accused AdidasPrimeknitshoes of infringing on Flyknit patents. The lawsuit was settled in 2021. The case was settled in 2022.
But this new era of AI has not come without controversy, as authors and rights holders have launched waves of litigation against the companies that trained and released generative AI models, as well as their investors and affiliates, alleging violations of intellectual property rights. 1] Proving Defendants Use of Training Data Inputs.
In the lawsuit I’m covering today, Roblox named over 250 defendants. If that’s true with the other 18 cases, Roblox may have sued 4,000+ defendants using the SAD Scheme. Hierl was the lead counsel on the Emojico case I opined on in 2021.] * * * Jurisdiction The defendant Bigfinz sells t-shirts. at issue here.
VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative?
I’m pleased to share a draft of a new paper, “ A SAD New Category of Abusive Intellectual Property Litigation.” This paper explains the scheme, how it bypasses standard legal safeguards, how it’s affected hundreds of thousands of defendants, and how it may have cost the federal courts a quarter-billion dollars.
(I wrote an expert declaration about them in 2021). One defendant fought back. I believe Emojico has sued hundreds or thousands of defendants because the word “emoji” appears in the product listing to describe an emoji displayed on the offered item. The SAD Scheme helps with that. ” That’s true.
When I first blogged this case in January 2021, I wrote: This lawsuit, like many others before it, claims that UGC services like YouTube commit illegal discrimination based on how they moderate content. YouTube nevertheless sidesteps the trouble because it apparently added the language in 2021 (seriously, what was YouTube thinking???)
They supplemented that review with an analysis of court approaches to virtual hearings, e-filing, and digital notarization, focusing on how these tools affected litigants in three of the most common types of civil cases: debt claims, evictions and child support. million remote proceedings (civil and criminal) from March 2020 to February 2021.
In the spring of 2021, he relocated to Montana and revamped his contracting business. Even pro se litigants typically recognize these cases are doomed and rarely file them any more. Other negative reviews were never removed by Nextdoor. Duffer sued Nextdoor for failing to remove its users’ consumer reviews. Nextdoor, Inc.
Founded: 7/6/2021. From launch, we closed our first customer in December 2021. Founded: 4/1/2021. Elevator pitch: Judges are like the umpires of the courtroom, but litigators lack the information they need to understand the parameters of each umpire’s strike zone. Headquarters: New York, N.Y. Analytica Legalis.
In 2016, the defendant IJR published an article/listicle titled “15 Signs Your Daddy Was a Conservative.” The defendant did not give the specified attribution. 21-2021 (4th Cir. Larry Philpot is a repeat copyright plaintiff. We’ve blogged some of his cases before ( 1 , 2 ), including the lower court ruling in this case.
Koerner Endowed Professor of Law, Tulane University Law School [See part 1 about defendant opt-outs and part 2 about defendant defaults.] In fact, the factual data was scraped by both of us over a period of time in 2021 and 2022 and put into a database. On April 16, 2021, Prutton responded.
The plaintiff, Silvia Diaz-Roa , filed the lawsuit against Hermes Law , a Texas law firm, and ClaimDeck , a litigation management system for insurers and insurance-defense firms that spun out of Hermes Law. The defendants have not yet filed an answer in the lawsuit. For ClaimDeck, she became head of product and chief operating officer.
The technology may be able to determine a criminal defendants competence to stand trial. How will it interact with a defendants right against self-incrimination? In 2021, the Chilean government enacted a constitutional amendment protecting brain activity and data. However, how reliable will this evidence be?
Neither Time nor BuzzFeed was named as a defendant. To be clear, the plain language of the Copyright Act requires that the defendant must display a “copy” of the image; but it does not say that the “copy” must necessarily be in the defendant’s possession.] 2021); McGucken v. See the screenshot on the right). 3d at 593. [To
By following its details closely, we can begin to unravel the strategic importance of judicial research and analytics for civil litigation at the state trial court level. Now, fast-forward to 2021. Chalfant ruling in favor of the defendant in 75% and 46% of their bench trials respectively. A Case Study in Judicial Analytics.
Discovery practitioners should have a thorough understanding of their clients’ information systems in order to properly defend or prosecute their cases; otherwise they risk severe consequences. Case Summary In a trademark case involving e-cigarettes branded under similar marks, the defendants and their counsel were sanctioned more than $2.5
Last month, the Colorado Supreme Court issued official guidelines for virtual participation in trial court proceedings , allowing litigants, victims, witnesses, and attorneys to attend virtually. As the Colorado policy recognizes, the “COVID-19 pandemic changed that.” hours each way to appear in person for a 15-minute scheduling hearing.
They supplemented that review with an analysis of court approaches to virtual hearings, e-filing, and digital notarization, focusing on how these tools affected litigants in three of the most common types of civil cases: debt claims, evictions and child support. million remote proceedings (civil and criminal) from March 2020 to February 2021.
According to Stanford University’s 2022 AI Index Report , private investment in AI in 2021 totaled approximately $93.5 billion—more than double the previous year. But balanced against this promise are significant business risks. For example, in Marchand v.
They navigate the intricacies of contract negotiations, tackle compliance matters head-on, and stand ready to defend in litigation battles. According to BarkerGilmore’s In-House Counsel Compensation Report, in-house mobility jumped 50 percent from 2020 to 2021, and this has largely held steady.
They navigate the intricacies of contract negotiations, tackle compliance matters head-on, and stand ready to defend in litigation battles. According to BarkerGilmore’s In-House Counsel Compensation Report, in-house mobility jumped 50 percent from 2020 to 2021, and this has largely held steady.
Founded: 7/6/2021. From launch, we closed our first customer in December 2021. Founded: 4/1/2021. Elevator pitch: Judges are like the umpires of the courtroom, but litigators lack the information they need to understand the parameters of each umpire’s strike zone. Headquarters: New York, N.Y. Analytica Legalis.
In litigation and intellectual property matters, it is the responsibility of docketing professionals to ensure that electronic court pleadings and documents are properly and timely filed, to maintain internal databases of docketed documents, and to facilitate access to documents by the firm’s legal professionals. Future Plans for the NDA.
June 25, 2021) will likely create new uncertainties. 2021) , the Second Circuit held that “plaintiffs may establish [Article III] standing based on an increased risk of identity theft or fraud following the unauthorized disclosure of their data.” Customer Data Security Breach Litigation , No. Ramirez , No. 20-297, slip op.
On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a significant opinion on standing in the context of consumer class actions in TransUnion LLC v. Article III grants federal courts the power to redress harms that defendants cause plaintiffs, not a freewheeling power to hold defendants accountable for legal infractions.”
I hear lawyers continually point to public defenders, the courts, legal aid and pro bono as what their profession is doing to support access to justice. Kelli was a 2021 Women of Legal Tech honoree and is currently serving on the RAILS – Responsible A.I. in Legal Services implementation team through the Duke Center on Law & Tech.
What to do : This case suggests that, in the UK, data breach litigation will be confined to Data Protection Act-related claims. Claimant lawyers will no longer be able to recover after-the-event insurance premiums in data breach litigation (which are used to cover their costs if they win, and the defendant’s if they lose).
Digital Doorbells: If any more evidence is needed that facial recognition technology has hit the mainstream, consider CNET’s review of the best facial recognition security cameras of 2021. C20-1084JLR, 2021 WL 1401633, at *2 (W.D. C20-1082JLR, 2021 WL 1401634, at *5 (W.D. What Kind of Data Do Facial Recognition Laws Cover?
VoiceScript Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. The substantial amount of time lawyers spend drafting documents during litigation. What makes you unique or innovative? Anything else?
This week we have Damien Riehl , VP, Litigation Workflow and Analytics Content at FastCase, and one of the drivers behind SALI (Standards Advancement for for the Legal Industry.) Damien is the Vice-President of Litigation Workflow and Analytics content and part of the leadership at SALI. And then I litigate the patent.
If the Supreme Court upholds the discovery rule for copyright cases, or simply declines to address it, the decision will leave copyright defendants exposed to very large awards for years of infringing conduct (as they have been everywhere but the Second Circuit). 2021 WL 2905410, at *2 (S.D. What follows is a more thorough explanation.
But by providing a foil in litigation against both the Center for Countering Digital Hate (“CCDH”) and Bright Data (the world’s largest seller of scraped data), he’s given judges in the most important district court in the country for tech legal issues, the Northern District of California, plenty of motivation to rule against him.
The defendants run a call-center service that attracts prospective legal clients and then makes compensated referrals of the prospective clients to lawyers. The defendants bought competitive keyword ads on Adler’s trademarks, which Adler objected to. The parties most vigorously contest the “actual confusion” evidence.
In 2021, the court dismissed the non-FOSTA claims but did not dismiss the FOSTA claim. Mindgeek litigation, the court certified a class of CSAM victims suing Mindgeek for “knowingly” disseminating videos of them. The plaintiffs allege that Twitter disseminated CSAM that it knew about, and the dissemination violated FOSTA.
Gallagher Data Breach Litigation , 631 F.Supp.3d 28, 2022): – “Defendants argue that May fails to allege a specific action Defendants took or failed to take that breached a duty under the CCPA to maintain “reasonable” security measures. In re Arthur J. 3d 573 (N.D. ” * Florence v.
million emergency department visits for unintentional injuries were recorded in 2021 ( National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ). Law firms that develop expertise in areas like opioid litigation, nursing home negligence, and emerging vehicle technologies will be well-positioned to help clients affected by these issues.
Given its similarity to Illinois’s (BIPA), if the New York BPA is enacted, it would likely make New York home to a flurry of class action litigation. Preparing to defend class actions. The authors thank Cameron Sharp, a 2021 Debevoise summer associate, for his substantial assistance with this series.
Although copyright infringement is a strict liability tort, all of these facts might have helped to convince Goldsmith to settle on reasonable terms, and all of them would have made AWF a more sympathetic defendant in the unlikely event that Goldsmith pursued her claims and a trial was needed. 1183 (2021). Oracle , 141 S.Ct.
This decision largely rejects the defendants’ motion to dismiss, which will induce more plaintiff lawyers to bring more cases. One possible outcome is that intermediate plaintiff wins like this opinion offer false hope for the long-term success of this litigation genre. made post-spinout.
Monitor Aggressive Policy Developments under New FTC Chair Lina Khan As noted in a prior Debevoise in Depth article, on July 1, 2021, the FTC implemented a number of rules and policies that signal the arrival of a new era of aggressive FTC enforcement. [3]
If you handle IP management, patent prosecution, or patent litigation, this resource deserves a spot in your library. INCOME TAX FUNDAMENTALS 2021 (WITH INTUIT PROCONNECT TAX ONLINE) by Gerald E. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: LEGAL ASPECTS OF INNOVATION AND COMPETITION by Kurt M. We’d love to see this one turned into a Netflix movie.
Meanwhile, product design is the real Section 230 battlefront today, and the Lemmon case is the flagship case for that line of litigation. The Step Two case dealt with an edge situation (defendant with no physical presence in the US), and the Hemi case raises some tricky tribal independence issues. Last year, I shrunk the book by 7%.
ACLU, saying that filtering solutions were less restrictive than server-side content controls (it took another 5 years of litigation before the challenges were fully resolved). The court credited the concerns, surfaced in the COPA litigation, that age authentication creates security concerns. Inconceivable. Dean, 2d Cir. 2003; ACLU v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content