This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The JMOL had two primary conclusions: First , that the CFAA has extraterritorial application, and therefore it was appropriate for this court to apply the CFAA here. By the time trial rolled around, this case involved only an Irish plaintiff (Ryanair) and a Dutch defendant (Booking.com B.V.). But this court says, not so.
Nikes History of Defending Its Patents Nike is no stranger to intellectual property lawsuits. The sportswear giant has sued multiple competitors over its Flyknit technology, including: Adidas (2021) Nike accused AdidasPrimeknitshoes of infringing on Flyknit patents. The lawsuit was settled in 2021. The case was settled in 2022.
The court summarizes the case: Rodney Woodland, a freelance artist and model, posts semi-naked photographs of himself in different poses on Instagram. The court displayed all of the photos side-by-side, so of course we’re going to look at them. I guess that makes me old-school. So I think this is a SFW post.
Ticketmaster changed the Terms on its website on July 2, 2021, requiring all website users to agree to arbitration under New Era’s Rules. The court’s reaction is predictable if chilling. I note that Ticketmaster is a special defendant due to their decades-long efforts to stretch/hork online contract formation law.
A look back at 2024 shows that plaintiffs are learning from the initial wave of cases filed against AI developers, and that plaintiffs are now adapting their claimsas well as the defendants they are suingto meet the shifting legal terrain. 1] Proving Defendants Use of Training Data Inputs.
But instead of getting public support, Lululemon is facing an uphill battle in the court of public opinion. Lululemon is asking the court to: Stop Costco from selling the alleged knockoffs Remove ads and marketing for the items Award Lululemon damages for lost profits What is Trade Dress? What is the Lawsuit About?
Off-Channel Risk Is Real From 2021 until early 2025, the SEC and CFTC conducted investigations into off-channel communications into dozens of asset managers and broker-dealers, resulting in more than $3 billion in total penalties. 3] As these matters reflect, mobile messaging is a widespread and routine method of business communication.
The defendant runs a Florida horse ranch. In 2016, the defendant licensed the plaintiff’s Equine Boarding Forms Package, consisting of form releases for adults and minors. The license permitted the defendant to “copy, email and otherwise distribute the” forms but not post them to the web. ” Citing Bell v.
9) Supreme Court Tamps Down on Jawboning and Government Social Media Lawsuits. The Supreme Court is taking a steady stream of Internet Law cases, a trend that will continue for some time. Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the TikTok ban, and Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Free Speech Coalition v.
million emergency department visits for unintentional injuries were recorded in 2021 ( National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey ). Filing statistics: Nearly 400,000 personal injury claims are filed annually across the United States, predominantly in state courts ( U.S. Department of Justice ).
This decision largely rejects the defendants’ motion to dismiss, which will induce more plaintiff lawyers to bring more cases. Component Part Manufacturer The court allows the plaintiff to proceed on the argument that Google is a “component part manufacturer” of Character.ai Character.ai made post-spinout.
In the lawsuit I’m covering today, Roblox named over 250 defendants. If that’s true with the other 18 cases, Roblox may have sued 4,000+ defendants using the SAD Scheme. Hierl was the lead counsel on the Emojico case I opined on in 2021.] * * * Jurisdiction The defendant Bigfinz sells t-shirts. at issue here.
(I wrote an expert declaration about them in 2021). One defendant fought back. I believe Emojico has sued hundreds or thousands of defendants because the word “emoji” appears in the product listing to describe an emoji displayed on the offered item. The SAD Scheme helps with that. ” That’s true.
The pandemic caused civil courts in the United States to adopt technology at an unprecedented pace and scale, improving participation in court proceedings and helping users resolve disputes more efficiently. Pew researchers examined pandemic-related emergency orders issued by the supreme courts of all 50 states and Washington, D.C.
When I first blogged this case in January 2021, I wrote: This lawsuit, like many others before it, claims that UGC services like YouTube commit illegal discrimination based on how they moderate content. The latest ruling addresses YouTube’s motion to dismiss the fourth amended complaint, which the court grants with prejudice.
Savoy, 2021 N.C. July 28, 2021). Grant, 2021 Ariz. March 31, 2021). 28, 2020): There are facts from which a jury could determine that Defendants created and/or developed website content making the immunity under Section 230 of the CDA inapplicable and thus summary judgment is not appropriate. .] * Palmer v.
” The abstract: This paper describes a sophisticated but underreported system of mass-defendant intellectual property litigation called the “Schedule A Defendants Scheme” (the “SAD Scheme”), which occurs most frequently in the Northern District of Illinois as a way to target Chinese online marketplace vendors.
While we are happy to lead an industry disruption, we welcome new competition, which we believe will help accelerate adoption of new AI-powered eDiscovery technologies by courts, law firms, and other stakeholders. We securely give fiduciaries access to assets when required with no password-sharing, no court orders, and correct titling.
The court doesn’t include a screenshot of the online TOS formation process. The TOS contained an arbitration clause that the defendants seek to invoke. The court characterizes the formation process as a “clickwrap,” which the court says usually create binding contracts.
The court summarizes the plaintiff’s allegations: Plaintiff alleges that in October, 2020, he received a negative review on Nextdoor from a former customer. In the spring of 2021, he relocated to Montana and revamped his contracting business. ” The court cites Force v. A series of other negative reviews followed.
We’ve blogged some of his cases before ( 1 , 2 ), including the lower court ruling in this case. In 2016, the defendant IJR published an article/listicle titled “15 Signs Your Daddy Was a Conservative.” The defendant did not give the specified attribution. ” The district court granted summary judgment to IJR.
If January is anything to go by, 2021 will be the same. New data breach notification guidance from the European Data Protection Board (“EDPB”), multi-million Euro penalties from DPAs in Germany, Spain and Norway, and court rulings on discriminatory use of algorithms, the one-stop-shop and GDPR’s territorial scope were all in the mix.
Koerner Endowed Professor of Law, Tulane University Law School [See part 1 about defendant opt-outs and part 2 about defendant defaults.] Consistent with the CCB’s small claims court ethos, the case involved both a pro se claimant and respondent. The CCB filing cost is about $300 less than federal court.
The pandemic caused civil courts in the United States to adopt technology at an unprecedented pace and scale, improving participation in court proceedings and helping users resolve disputes more efficiently. Pew researchers examined pandemic-related emergency orders issued by the supreme courts of all 50 states and Washington, D.C.
Neither Time nor BuzzFeed was named as a defendant. Supreme Court. Although some of the people using the machine may directly infringe copyrights, courts analyze the machine owner’s liability under the rubric of contributory infringement, not direct infringement. Instagram, LLC , 2023 WL 4554649 (9th Cir. July 17, 2023).
Supreme Court TransUnion decision. On June 25, 2021, the Supreme Court issued a significant opinion on standing in the context of consumer class actions in TransUnion LLC v. The Supreme Court affirmed that certain members of a class action lacked standing—and therefore could not be members of the class. The Opinion.
In a lawsuit filed this week in federal court in Manhattan, the former chief operating office of a legal technology company claims she was fired after attempting to exercise stock options valued at over $1 million. The defendants have not yet filed an answer in the lawsuit.
Superior Court, to claim an Xcential invention as its own and to throttle us for, among other allegations, misappropriation of trade secrets. At great cost, Xcential has been forced to defend itself with counterclaims and motions for dismissal. Superior Court in October. Superior Court) in third. The Holy Grail?
The technology may be able to determine a criminal defendants competence to stand trial. How will it interact with a defendants right against self-incrimination? In 2021, the Chilean government enacted a constitutional amendment protecting brain activity and data. However, how reliable will this evidence be?
Supreme Court TransUnion decision. Individuals whose personal information was compromised in a data breach have had mixed success in bringing lawsuits in federal court against the companies that held their data. June 25, 2021) will likely create new uncertainties. This is Part 1 of a two-part article on the recent U.S.
By following its details closely, we can begin to unravel the strategic importance of judicial research and analytics for civil litigation at the state trial court level. Now, fast-forward to 2021. But how have the judges at the state trial court level defined a gift?
This counsel instead subjected the court to a self-described “inner circle of judicial hell” in dealing with discovery ineptitude. As complex discovery has become a specialized field, courts have also grown more sophisticated in their understanding of the hallmarks of competent e-discovery counsel versus those who are merely winging it.
In litigation and intellectual property matters, it is the responsibility of docketing professionals to ensure that electronic court pleadings and documents are properly and timely filed, to maintain internal databases of docketed documents, and to facilitate access to documents by the firm’s legal professionals. I don’t care.
Individual complaints : The possibility of an increased volume of complaints to DPAs following a Belgian Supreme Court decision that allows individuals to complain about companies’ alleged GDPR violations, even if their own personal data has not been processed. These developments, and more, detailed below.
Last month, the Colorado Supreme Court issued official guidelines for virtual participation in trial court proceedings , allowing litigants, victims, witnesses, and attorneys to attend virtually. Colorado courts relied heavily on virtual proceedings, as did courts around the country.
According to Stanford University’s 2022 AI Index Report , private investment in AI in 2021 totaled approximately $93.5 billion—more than double the previous year. But balanced against this promise are significant business risks.
Digital Doorbells: If any more evidence is needed that facial recognition technology has hit the mainstream, consider CNET’s review of the best facial recognition security cameras of 2021. Compensatory damages or damages between $200 and $1,000 are authorized for each unlawful sale, as are reasonable attorneys’ fees and court costs.
Legal professionals who work in the highly sought-after field of accounting law assist with audits, offer guidance on the tax considerations of business decisions, represent clients in court cases, and more. In this piece, we’ll explore the path to becoming an accounting lawyer and how you can leverage these unique skills to your advantage.
UK High Court dismisses most of the Dixons data breach claim What happened : The UK High Court dismissed various claims against DSG Retail Limited (“DSG”), the owner of Currys PC World and Dixons Travel, relating to a 2017 – 2018 data breach where hackers accessed personal data in the company’s systems.
I hear lawyers continually point to public defenders, the courts, legal aid and pro bono as what their profession is doing to support access to justice. Also - shout out to the law librarians, court navigators, and other nonprofits like DV agencies who don’t get as much attention for their labor.)
Founded: 7/6/2021. From launch, we closed our first customer in December 2021. Founded: 4/1/2021. We help lawyers make evidence-based decisions about the venues they choose and the arguments they make by focusing on the jurisprudence of the judges and courts they interact with. Headquarters: New York, N.Y.
See NC State Bar Formal Ethics Opinion 1 (2021). Michigan’s opinion from 2022 ( MI State Bar Formal Ethics Opinion R-26 ) examines the extent to which lawyers may reveal confidences to defend themselves, following the majority view: The Rule permits disclosure of client confidences or secrets in relevant part, “.
However, as emphasized on West Point’s website , “After the final play is run and the final whistle is blown, both teams clasp hands and become part of a bigger team – America’s Team – and a greater brotherhood – standing shoulder to shoulder with each other in harm’s way and ready to stand in the gap to defend this great Nation.”
In 2021, an application was filed to the US Copyright office, for copyright registration of a comic book consisting of text and images (created partly by a human and partly by AI tool “ Midjourney ”). The term “person” has also been interpreted conservatively by the Courts in respect of copyright law.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content