This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
As I recounted in a 2019 post , ROSS emerged out of the University of Toronto as a student-built entrant in a cognitive-computing competition staged by IBM to develop applications for its Watson computer. My 2019 post detailed my visit to ROSS’s Toronto research and development office. In 2015, they secured $4.3
It launched in 2017 to great fanfare, promising to “revolutionize legal services” through its dual-entity model of both a law firm and a technology company. While ROSS vehemently denied the allegations, the lawsuit crippled its ability to raise new financing or explore potential acquisition opportunities. LexisNexis Firm Manager.
In 2019 the antitrust division of the DOJ filed United States v. Further, in recent years the DOJ and the FTC have taken a more aggressive approach to antitrust laws against technology companies that may signal a new era of antitrust enforcement. However, after ten years, Live Nation did not live up to its end of the bargain.
This long-running lawsuit started in 2019. When I first blogged this case in January 2021, I wrote: This lawsuit, like many others before it, claims that UGC services like YouTube commit illegal discrimination based on how they moderate content. Google appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Recapping a couple of doomed-from-inception lawsuits. Apparently the publication took place in 2019 and he filed suit in 2023. The post Section 230 Preempts Two More Harassment Lawsuits appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. Benedict v. Google LLC , 2024 WL 3427161 (D. ” Defamation. Harassment.
In 2019 the antitrust division of the DOJ filed United States v. Further, in recent years the DOJ and the FTC have taken a more aggressive approach to antitrust laws against technology companies that may signal a new era of antitrust enforcement. However, after ten years, Live Nation did not live up to its end of the bargain.
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy With as much scraping as is happening for AI training and enhancement these days, it’s amazing to me that there aren’t more lawsuits happening over scraping. And there is a legal regime dedicated to that issue, and it’s called copyright law. A real party-in-interest to this lawsuit is OpenAI.
It is one of the many video game addiction lawsuits percolating throughout the courts nationwide. Epic added that in 2019 with a time-limited opt-out, which the children didn’t exercise. The court applies the law formalistically: N.O. Roblox (Catch-up Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
This lawsuit relates to an episode of the TV show Evil Lives Here called “I Invited Him In,” which discusses an NY serial killer named Nathaniel White. But the commerce clause was not intended to nationalize the whole of America law.” 2019 WL 5595037 (S.D.N.Y. Google, Inc., 2016 WL 6806250 (S.D.N.Y. Yandex Inc.,
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Facebook , a California appeals court shocked the advertising community by suggesting that using common demographic criteria for ad targeting, such as age or gender, may violate California’s anti-discrimination law.
In a lawsuit filed this week in federal court in Manhattan, the former chief operating office of a legal technology company claims she was fired after attempting to exercise stock options valued at over $1 million. The defendants have not yet filed an answer in the lawsuit.
At issue are two versions of the TOS from 2016 and 2019. Amazon updated the TOS in 2019 to make explicit that arbitrability would be decided by an arbitrator, and it emailed the drivers the new TOS. ” The court then says that the lawsuit is outside the scope of the 2016 TOS because it doesn’t relate to the contract.
Twenty former federal law enforcement and national security officials filed an amicus brief in the SEC’s fraud lawsuit against the IT company SolarWinds, which was hit by a massive 2019-2020 breach.
In March 2023, Meta Platforms lost a class action lawsuit against the Dutch Data Privacy Stichting in an Amsterdam court, acting in conjunction with the Consumentenbond, the Dutch Consumers’ Association. The concept of necessity has an independent meaning in European Union law, which must reflect the objectives of data protection law.
The law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld has lost its bid to dismiss four of five counterclaims filed by the legal technology company Xcential Legislative Technologies in a lawsuit over ownership rights to legislation-drafting software that each side says was its idea.
A 25-person legal technology company in California is fighting back against one of the world’s largest law firms in a lawsuit over ownership rights to legislation-drafting software that each side says was its idea. Attorneys at Akin Gump declined to discuss the lawsuit. Series of Meetings.
For 2019, I replaced the year-end list with a decade-end list. If a law firm is unable even to decide whether its staff should return to the office, or when that return should happen, or how to structure that return, then how can that firm implement lasting and innovative changes in its technology infrastructure and systems?
In my previous post , I summarized: This lawsuit involves troubling allegations that Facebook executives ( allegedly , Nick Clegg, Nicola Mendelsohn, and Cristian Perrella) took bribes from OnlyFans-related entities to spike Facebook and Instagram posts that promoted competitors of OnlyFans. The plaintiffs’ allegations were sizzling.
As I reported here in November , the law firm Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld has sued Xcential for misappropriation of trade secrets, breach of contract, and other causes of action. This is Stodder’s perspective on the lawsuit. If anyone at Akin Gump wishes to respond, I would be happy to publish it.].
Founded: 5/10/2019. Our system inherently understands legal relationships and keeps up with changes in the law. Target customer: In-house legal departments and law firm attorneys who serve as outside general counsel. Target customer: Law departments in 2022 and expanding into law firms in 2023. Founded: 11/1/2019.
Where the motion to dismiss concerns questions of law, additional discovery is not required. Where the motion to dismiss concerns questions of law, additional discovery is not required. Therefore, as MindGeek’s motion to dismiss concerns only questions of law, no discovery is required to rule on the motion to dismiss.
Cattelan created artwork named “Comedian” in 2019. A Personal View The High Tech Law Institute has a special affinity for bananas copyright law. Now we’re more even more sure that we didn’t violate copyright law with this marketing. Cattelan appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.
Examples of employment law forms include state-specific employment contracts, employment manuals, independent contractor agreements, privacy solutions, and return-to-work policies. probably the leading law firm in Silicon Valley and one of the top law firms in the world.
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy The intersection of the Federal Arbitration Act and the law of online contracts has become utterly corrosive to our legal system. And almost without exception, those legal agreements require users of digital platforms to waive their right to a jury trial, a class-action lawsuit, and various other civil rights.
A new product uses historical data, artificial intelligence and predictive analytics to value cases and predict outcomes in automobile warranty litigation, with the goal of helping manufacturers resolve Lemon Law and warranty claims more accurately, more quickly, and at lower cost. billion in just the U.S. Predicting Case Outcomes.
Plaintiff law firms are flooding television channels and digital media platforms with ads, seeking clients for personal injury and product liability cases. For instance, during the height of lawsuits targeting Monsanto’s Roundup weedkiller in 2019, the industry spent nearly $300 million on television spots.
As I recounted in a 2019 post , ROSS emerged out of the University of Toronto as a student-built entrant in a cognitive-computing competition staged by IBM to develop applications for its Watson computer. My 2019 post detailed my visit to ROSS’s Toronto research and development office. The Toronto-based company recently closed a $2.1
For what are likely good reasons, Amazon deleted his book reviews and removed his ability to write new ones in October 2019. Amazon appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. .” (For more, see this story and his own self-analysis using Jordan Peterson’s personality test ). No thank you. July 18, 2023).
16] Companies accomplish this by first suing generic-manufacturing companies for patent infringement, and then settling the lawsuit by paying them to stay out of the market in what is known as a reverse-payment settlement. [17] 19] The lawsuit ended in a settlement with Gilead agreeing to pay Teva, the supposed infringer, $1.5
The law firm produced the documents but sought reimbursement for over $44,000 spent complying with the subpoena. Although the law firm petitioned for costs under Fed. 7, 2019) , noted Cardinal and agreed that third-party subpoenas must not burden responding parties. The court denied the reimbursement request. 19 C 3365 (N.D.
Moritz College of Law The copyright – contract tension Stewart Brand famously said that information wants to be free. We know, however, that many laws limit free access and use of information goods, most prominently copyright law (and IP law generally). Guy Rub , The Ohio State University Michael E. ML Genius v.
by guest blogger Kieran McCarthy Many characterize the law of copyright preemption of contracts as a circuit split. But that undersells the level of inconsistency in courts’ interpretations of the law of copyright preemption. With that, any state or common law claim that is equivalent to copyright must therefore be preempted.
She worked at one of the largest international corporate law firms in Asia before opening her own virtual practice. Prior to joining LAWPRO, he was a policy lawyer at the Law Society of Ontario and practiced litigation with a focus on professional liability, public law and civil disputes. Tracking lawsuits.
A new product uses historical data, artificial intelligence and predictive analytics to value cases and predict outcomes in automobile warranty litigation, with the goal of helping manufacturers resolve Lemon Law and warranty claims more accurately, more quickly, and at lower cost. billion in just the U.S. Predicting Case Outcomes.
In this episode of The Geek in Review, hosts Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer interview three guests from UK law firm Travers Smith about their work on AI: Chief Technology Officer Oliver Bethel , Director of Legal Technology Sean Curran , and AI Manager Sam Lansley. They co-authored a paper on subtle errors in legal AI.
This blog post gives an overview of the copyright issues surrounding use of generative AI and their current position under India’s copyright law. 3] Arguably, the position under Indian law may be different from the US Copyright office’s view (for reasons discussed below). Few of the cases are discussed below.
In todays digital time, law firms have access to more data than ever before. For law firms that dont have a data management plan, some important information is compelled to fall through the cracks and not ever make it to the clients file. Data modeling- describes how data flow through an application or law firm.
In today’s digital time, law firms have access to more data than ever before. For law firms that don’t have a data management plan, some important information is compelled to fall through the cracks and not ever make it to the client’s file. Data modeling- describes how data flow through an application or law firm.
For 2019, I replaced the year-end list with a decade-end list. If a law firm is unable even to decide whether its staff should return to the office, or when that return should happen, or how to structure that return, then how can that firm implement lasting and innovative changes in its technology infrastructure and systems?
Founded: 5/10/2019. Our system inherently understands legal relationships and keeps up with changes in the law. Target customer: In-house legal departments and law firm attorneys who serve as outside general counsel. Target customer: Law departments in 2022 and expanding into law firms in 2023. Founded: 11/1/2019.
This decision had significant implications for access to justice since it raised concerns about state regulatory entities, such as bar associations and state bars, regulating the unauthorized practice of law. On January 9, 2019, Kernodle-Hodges contacted me again to pick up limited legal licensing.
These models target low-income individuals and require modification of, exemption from, or waivers to unauthorized practice of law (UPL) restrictions. In 2019, Mary McClymont surveyed nonlawyer navigator programs in the U.S. Both innovations were made possible without UPL reform. who help self-represented litigants in state courts.(9)
In this episode of The Geek in Review, hosts Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer interview three guests from UK law firm Travers Smith about their work on AI: Chief Technology Officer Oliver Bethel , Director of Legal Technology Sean Curran , and AI Manager Sam Lansley. They co-authored a paper on subtle errors in legal AI.
1:18-CV-850-RP, 2019 WL 5258056, at *2 (W.D. June 26, 2019), report and recommendation adopted, No. 1:18-CV-850-RP, 2019 WL 5243187 (W.D. July 12, 2019). Adler v McNeil * Court Denies Injunction in Competitive Keyword Ad Lawsuit–Nursing CE Central v. WorkshopX Inc. Build a Sign, LLC , No. LoanStreet v.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content