This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
As courts have interpreted this law broadly, many argue that online platforms have abused such immunity and hold too much power. Courts have repeatedly ruled that private companies, including social media platforms, are not state actors and thus are not bound by the First Amendment in the same way the government and public entities are.
Case Background Marlean Ames, a heterosexual woman with 15 years of experience at the Ohio Department of Youth Services, alleged she was denied a promotion to a lesbian colleague in 2019 and later demoted in favor of a gay man. Lower courts dismissed her Title VII claims, requiring her to show “background circumstances” (e.g.,
Apple Inc , was brought after a whistleblower at Cupertino alleged in 2019 that Siri was listening in on audio conversations without the requisite “Hey Siri” spoken command or manually activating the voice assistant. Court filings [PDF] reference that California requires consent from both parties for recordings.
But in 2019 and 2020, these critical reminders went unseen. Although he appealed the expiry, the appellate court denied his appeal, finding that Taillefer not having a backup system for receiving emails regarding the maintenance fee payments was an accident waiting to happen.
It is one of the many video game addiction lawsuits percolating throughout the courts nationwide. Epic added that in 2019 with a time-limited opt-out, which the children didn’t exercise. Without showing the initial TOS page, the court labels it a “clickwrap.” The court applies the law formalistically: N.O.
But on June 4th, Reddit sued Anthropic in the Superior Court of California for breach of contract, unjust enrichment, trespass to chattels, tortious interference, and unfair competition. Almost all of the major legal scraping precedents happened in the Northern District, and it is definitely unusual that this was filed in state court.
The superior court found that Facebook violated this law and awarded $35M in penalties and attorneys’ fees as well as an injunction. In December 2024, the appeals court affirmed everything. First Amendment The court says that campaign disclosure laws usually get “exacting” scrutiny (like intermediate scrutiny).
He has been on this podcast twice before: In April 2019 , where he discussed the company’s founding and early development. Steno , reliable court reporting with a revolutionary approach If you enjoy listening to LawNext, please leave us a review wherever you listen to podcasts. Littler, local everywhere.
Weve gathered the best highlights with those whove walked the halls of Congress and presided over our nations highest courts because their insights dont just shape policies and decisions; they offer valuable lessons for anyone navigating the complexities of law, leadership, and life itself. Takeaways from Justices Chief Justice Nathan L.
The district court dismissed the case. The Ninth Circuit affirms every point of the district court’s decision. ” BTW, I disagree with the court’s summation of the Internet Brands case; I feel the Ninth Circuit got that one wrong because that case was always about third-party content. .”
9) Supreme Court Tamps Down on Jawboning and Government Social Media Lawsuits. The Supreme Court is taking a steady stream of Internet Law cases, a trend that will continue for some time. Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the TikTok ban, and Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Free Speech Coalition v.
We’ve analyzed the latest family law statistics to uncover key trends in divorce outcomes, custody arrangements, and court decisions that impact your daily practice. Family courts are handling diverse caseloads. Of the 66 million cases handled by state courts each year, nearly 3.8 in 1990 to 36% by 2019.
” The court previously described the core allegations: The plaintiffs allege that Onision “ran several YouTube channels” that “targeted minor audiences” and allowed Onision to “groom and lure underage girls.” The court previously dismissed the case on Section 230 grounds and rejected the FOSTA workaround.
The appellate court refers to Doe’s behavior as “ capping.” The court dismissed the case on Section 230 grounds. Knowing CSAM Possession The district court dismissed the CSAM civil claim on Section 230 grounds. The 11th Circuit affirms, but relies only partially on Section 230 grounds.
7] According to data from the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) analyzed by the Washington Post, Tesla’s Autopilot software has caused more injuries and fatalities than previously known: 17 deaths and 736 crashes since 2019. [8] 11] On June 29, 2019, Decedent Micah Lee drove a Tesla Model 3. [12] Scully et al.
If you didn’t make it to the 2019 ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco, worry not, we’ve got you covered. So excited for our opening act of podcast interviews from the 2019 ABA Annual Meeting in San Francisco! — Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) August 8, 2019. Immigration Courts and Due Process. We hope you enjoy!
Sara Agate, MPH (@sara_agate) March 2, 2019. The following comprises our audio coverage of ABA TECHSHOW 2019 and a list of those who participated. Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) February 27, 2019. ABA TECHSHOW 2019: Keynote Address. ABA TECHSHOW 2019: Tech Books For Lawyers. But so what?
Set against the gorgeous coastline of Monterey, California at the beautiful Portola Hotel & Spa, the 2019 California Lawyers Association (CLA) Annual Meeting had a small town feel of something much bigger. — Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) October 10, 2019. CLA 2019 Annual Meeting: Updates from CLA Leadership.
Held in Scottsdale, Arizona, the 2019 NALA Conference & Expo was perhaps their hottest conference to date with temperatures clocking in at 112 degrees. O’Neil who, since 2011, has been the presiding Disciplinary Judge of the Arizona Supreme Court. NALA Annual 2019: Opening Coverage. Their answers might surprise you!
Legal Talk Network partnered with Fastcase to cover the 2019 American Association of Law Libraries Annual Meeting & Conference. In addition to their anniversary, Fastcase unveiled their very first new treatise called ‘On Legal AI’ by Joshua Walker which was published by their publishing division called Full Court Press. .
As a special offer, State Bar of Texas members who listen to the episode titled “ State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting 2019: Josh Team and the Adaptable Lawyer ” can get one hour of self-study MCLE credit. So much fun covering the 2019 State Bar of Texas Annual Meeting. Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) June 26, 2019.
Christian is the Head of Strategy at Reynen Court LLC as well as the author of the Blacklines & Billables blog which, by the way, has its own podcast. pic.twitter.com/qnoc9lqYU9 — Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) February 1, 2019. Laurence Colletti (@LaurenceEsq) February 1, 2019.
All in all our convention coverage spanned 15 episode with 26 participants including Florida Supreme Court Chief Justice Charles T Canady, Florida Bar President-Elect Dori Foster-Morales, and return guests like Denis deVlaming and Kevin Johnson. Florida Bar Annual Convention 2019: A Year in Review with Past President Michelle Suskauer.
ECFX was founded in 2019 by Dan O’Day , a lawyer and veteran legal tech executive who previously worked for American LegalNet and Thomson Reuters, and Nelson Quintero , a longtime patent attorney. ” Growth Street cofounders Nate Grossman and Steve Wolfe cited the growing need for technology to manage court notices.
The pandemic caused civil courts in the United States to adopt technology at an unprecedented pace and scale, improving participation in court proceedings and helping users resolve disputes more efficiently. Pew researchers examined pandemic-related emergency orders issued by the supreme courts of all 50 states and Washington, D.C.
He also served on two Utah Supreme Court task forces that led to the creation of the Utah Sandbox. BYU Law Dean Gordon Smith on Law School Innovation (March 2019. Smith has been on this podcast twice before: BYU Law’s Innovative Dean Gordon Smith On His Next Five Years (March 2021).
“So often when attorneys are writing court documents or preparing for oral arguments and they want to know what their judge thinks about different issues in their case, they have very little information to go off of. . federal courts. The company’s roadmap calls for it to eventually expand into state courts as well.
In 2019, vLex acquired Justis Publishing Ltd. , Originally a legal research company, Fastcase has diversified in recent years, launching its Full Court Press publishing arm and acquiring Docket Alarm and Law Street Media in 2018, NextChapter in 2019, and the technology and team of Judicata in 2020.
This long-running lawsuit started in 2019. The latest ruling addresses YouTube’s motion to dismiss the fourth amended complaint, which the court grants with prejudice. The court asked the plaintiffs to point to the relevant contract provisions that shape the implied covenant. Case citation : Divino Group LLC v.
Trellis Research , an AI-powered state court research and analytics platform, has raised $14.1 Launched in 2018 as a judicial analytics platform for California state courts, Trellis has now broadened into a searchable database of state trial court data, covering courts in 12 states.
Reynen Court , the so-called app store of law, is reducing its headcount, cutting expenses, and telling vendors on its platform they might experience service delays. Reynen Court has now discontinued the online stock offering. But Andrew D. million round earlier this year. Klein did not say how many people have been laid off.
After hearing this allegation at least twice, the Court instructed plaintiffs’ counsel to go present proof of such a bribe and to specifically subpoena the banks that were allegedly involved in laundering the bribe. This was, in a way, to “monopolize” the adult entertainment market. Case Citation : Dangaard v.
Launched in 2019, Quick Check was Westlaw’s answer to other brief-checking products on the market, all of which followed the 2016 introduction by Casetext of the original case-checking tool, CARA. The new feature flags cases that may run counter to an opponent’s arguments.
Sam Bankman-Fried had founded cryptocurrency exchange FTX in 2019 and served as its CEO, despite allegedly knowing nothing about cryptocurrency at the time. Some claims may be resolved through securities arbitration , while others can proceed in court. He soon became a billionaire, but the bubble did not take long to burst.
Scott Timmer of the Arizona Supreme Court, who chaired the Arizona Supreme Court’s Task Force on the Delivery of Legal Services, which recommended rules ultimately adopted by the court that created a new tier of legal services provider and eliminated the ban on non-lawyer ownership. Thank You To Our Sponsors.
In 2019, I visited ROSS’s Toronto research and development office, after which I wrote a lengthy post about what I saw and learned, as well as about the company’s history and its potential future. In 2017, Forbes named the three founders to its “30 Under 30.” There is, however, a somewhat happy ending to the story of Gavelytics.
To uncover those violations, reporters reviewed the financial holdings of some 700 federal judges and compared them against tens of thousands of court cases. The data the Journal used was compiled by the Free Law Project , a non-profit that works to provide free and open public access to court data, opinions, filings and other information.
The court agrees with Microsoft. ’…the trial court was correct to grant summary judgment finding Microsoft immune from Mr. Ct. 2019 WL 5595037 (S.D.N.Y. Among other defendants, he sued Microsoft for Bing search results linking to the episode. Microsoft defended on Section 230 grounds. 2016); Despot v. Google, Inc.,
Legaltech 2019 It is, in fact, a little embarrassing. I was impressed with Fastcase’s Docket Alarm – an award winner at the show – that offers full text docket search and alerts, as well as analytics, for federal and some state courts. I have been writing about legal technology issues for probably close to a decade.
Today ECFX announced that they had raised $7M in funding to expand their court notice management platform. ECFX was founded in 2019 by attorneys Dan O’Day and Nelson Quintero. The system is designed to reduce risk of missed deadlines as well as repetitive administrative work associated with court notices.
At issue are two versions of the TOS from 2016 and 2019. Amazon updated the TOS in 2019 to make explicit that arbitrability would be decided by an arbitrator, and it emailed the drivers the new TOS. Nor did the court have other evidence that might allow it to assess notice, such as a description of the email.
The training program, a partnership between the Arizona Supreme Court and Innovation for Justice (i4J), a program jointly housed at the James E. Related: LawNext Episode 60: Innovation for Justice Director Stacy Rupprecht Jane.
For 2019, I replaced the year-end list with a decade-end list. In the realms of legal technology and innovation, the pandemic had yielded silver linings – greater adoption of technology, more flexible workplaces, hybrid courts – that promised a future in which the legal profession and justice system would better serve those who need them.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content