This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
While the CCPAs proposed rules are promising, they still diverge in key respects from the GDPR Europes comprehensive data protection law that has been setting the standard since 2018. Consent: Opt-Out vs. Opt-In Perhaps the most fundamental difference between the CCPA and GDPR lies in their consent frameworks.
Skechers (2016) Nike took Skechers to court for allegedly infringing eight Nike patents, including patents covering the Flyknit technology. Puma (2018) Another legal battle over Flyknit-type shoe designs. The case was settled in 2022. The lawsuit was settled in 2021.
Data Protection Authority powers: The European Court of Justice (CJEU) has ruled that Data Protection Authorities are not obliged to exercise corrective powers in the event of a breach. The German courts referred the interpretation of GDPR to the CJEU.
The court summarizes the case: Rodney Woodland, a freelance artist and model, posts semi-naked photographs of himself in different poses on Instagram. The court displayed all of the photos side-by-side, so of course we’re going to look at them. I guess that makes me old-school. So I think this is a SFW post.
But courts may take divergent paths on those issues, especially given the fact-specific nature of many of the plaintiffs challenges, which depend not only on their specific claimed rights but also on the way each AI company has trained their model and how those models function. Showing Substantial Similarity of Generative AI Outputs.
However, although persuasive, the Guidelines are not authoritative and the EU AI Acts application is likely to be refined by its practical implementation and the courts in the future. What to do : Businesses who use or distribute AI may wish to consider these guidelines when reviewing their compliance with the EU AI Acts prohibitions.
Employment Trends for Law Graduates In a joint study by the National Association for Law Placement (NALP) and the NALP Foundation, findings revealed that 97% of surveyed law graduates from the class of 2018 were employed. However, only 51% were working in law firms. 2 The ABA reported 7.6% In 2022, 84.6%
While the statutory elements of a Section 1202(b) claim appear straightforward, certain courts considering claims involving CMI have added two hurdles for copyright plaintiffs: a “double scienter” requirement and an identicality requirement. 2018); Victor Elias Photography, LLC v. Double Scienter. Buzzfeed , 970 F.3d 2020); Stevens v.
2] Even way back in 2018, LawGeex demonstrated the superior work of its technology as compared to humans, in issue-spotting clauses in NDAs. Sneed III on the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and then practiced law (primarily bankruptcy law) with Morrison & Foerster in San Francisco from 1986-1991.
It is one of the many video game addiction lawsuits percolating throughout the courts nationwide. Epic’s TOS In 2018, when the Fortnite accounts were created, Epic’s TOS didn’t contain an arbitration clause. Without showing the initial TOS page, the court labels it a “clickwrap.”
Supreme Court unanimously upheld the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act also known as the TikTok Sale-or-Ban Law. Events Leading up to the Supreme Court Ruling TikTok was created when ByteDance merged its successful Chinese app, Douyin, with the U.S.-based By Sauntharya Manikandan, J.D. individuals.
” In 2018, the state claimed Facebook violated the law, and Facebook stipulated to a $200k judgment. The superior court found that Facebook violated this law and awarded $35M in penalties and attorneys’ fees as well as an injunction. In December 2024, the appeals court affirmed everything.
The underlying failures alleged in the settlement occurred between 2018 and 2023. Decker filed the action after allegedly repeated attempts to raise internally the issue of compliance proved unsuccessful between 2018 and 2022. Penn State and DOJ reached a $1.25
It was also nice to have a place to immediately share my thoughts about the US Supreme Court oral argument and decisions in Elster and Jack Daniel’s: Guest Blog Post, Heightened Constitutional Scrutiny is Not Required for Content-Based Trademark Registration Laws that are Viewpoint-Neutral–Vidal v.
The district court dismissed the case. The Ninth Circuit affirms every point of the district court’s decision. ” BTW, I disagree with the court’s summation of the Internet Brands case; I feel the Ninth Circuit got that one wrong because that case was always about third-party content. .”
9) Supreme Court Tamps Down on Jawboning and Government Social Media Lawsuits. The Supreme Court is taking a steady stream of Internet Law cases, a trend that will continue for some time. Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the TikTok ban, and Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Free Speech Coalition v.
Now, courts will have the benefit of a “pre-publication” version of the Copyright Office’s long-awaited Report on Generative AI Training (the “May 2025 Report”). Adding to the uncertainty, the day after the pre-publication report was released, the Trump administration dismissed the Register of Copyrights—a move she is challenging in court.
25] If the SAFE Bet Act is enacted, its effects could undermine the Supreme Court’s monumental 2018 holding in Murphy v. Link to Image Source: [link] [1] In 2018, the Supreme Court held that states may legalize sports betting, inherently striking down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act. 453, 485 (2018). [2]
” The court previously described the core allegations: The plaintiffs allege that Onision “ran several YouTube channels” that “targeted minor audiences” and allowed Onision to “groom and lure underage girls.” The court previously dismissed the case on Section 230 grounds and rejected the FOSTA workaround.
The state appellate court disagrees. In addition to that flaw, the court says that Armslists allegations of jawboning dont rise to NRA v. in 2018, Senator Feinstein threatened to increase federal regulation over Facebook if it failed to provide the censorship that she deems appropriate. Vullo s level of censorial threats.
The appellate court refers to Doe’s behavior as “ capping.” The court dismissed the case on Section 230 grounds. Knowing CSAM Possession The district court dismissed the CSAM civil claim on Section 230 grounds. The 11th Circuit affirms, but relies only partially on Section 230 grounds.
According to the 2018-2022 5-year American Community Survey (ACS) estimates , the number of foreign-born individuals in the US was 45.3 In 1875, the Supreme Court declared immigration regulation a federal responsibility. They must also know how courts and federal agencies apply and enforce the law. This is approximately 13.7%
15] However, several months later, in another similar case, also in California, the outcome was quite different [16] On March 23, 2018, evidence indicated that Decedent Huang was playing a video game on his iPhone when he crashed into a concrete highway barrier. [17] 10] In October 2023, Tesla won the first U.S. Santa Clara Cnty.
The archive is intended to preserve these older articles, which were written prior to the Court Technology and Trial Presentation blog, which I started writing in 2009. Although these articles are somewhat "dated," many of them are still surprisingly relevant. Things are different for writers now, in that you can click, and publish.
Today’s document deep dive focus is on the recent California Court of Appeals decision to remand Wozniak v. YouTube, LLC to the Superior Court of Santa Clara County and the Hon. The lawsuit, filed in August 2018,… Continue reading → The post Document Deep Dive: The Return of Wozniak v.
This landmark case was the first and only Mexican-American civil rights case heard and decided by the United States Supreme Court. Her talent and grit were noticed, and she received a recommendation by the Texas congressional delegation for nomination by the White House to a United States District Court seat in Corpus Christi, Texas, in 2010.
In 2018, two years after D. He also served on two Utah Supreme Court task forces that led to the creation of the Utah Sandbox. Gordon Smith became dean of the J. Now, Smith has announced he is stepping down as dean at the end of this semester, after having been the second-longest serving dean in the school’s history.
As a litigator in Los Angeles, Nicole Clark saw that state court data could be a secret weapon for winning, but she also saw how difficult it was for her and other lawyers to access that data. Eventually, Clark hopes to see the use of court analytics become the industry standard, commonplace among litigators and expected by clients. .
On this episode of LawNext: An interview recorded live with Erika Harold , executive director of the Illinois Supreme Court Commission on Professionalism , an organization charged with working to enhance civility and professionalism and to eliminate bias within the legal profession.
Reynen Court , the so-called app store for legal technology, has promoted two of its key executives to new roles. The news comes a week after Reynen Court launched a general solicitation stock offering in order to bring on individual lawyers and “legal technology enthusiasts” as investors in the company. .
Law practice management company Clio has acquired the automated court-calendaring company CalendarRules , Clio’s first acquisition since becoming the first law practice management company to achieve unicorn status earlier this year and its second acquisition ever. Syncing court dates to calendars in Microsoft Outlook and Google Calendar. “By
Trellis , a company that provides legal analytics and research for state trial court records, has expanded its coverage into another five states, bringing its total coverage to 21 states. Trellis has now added coverage for courts in Michigan, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Wisconsin. Last year, it raised $14.1
Trellis Research , an AI-powered state court research and analytics platform, has raised $14.1 Launched in 2018 as a judicial analytics platform for California state courts, Trellis has now broadened into a searchable database of state trial court data, covering courts in 12 states.
Reynen Court , the so-called app store for legal technology, today launched a general solicitation stock offering in order to bring on individual lawyers and “legal technology enthusiasts” as investors in the company. . The offering, which is described at invest.reynencourt. million raised earlier this year.
After hearing this allegation at least twice, the Court instructed plaintiffs’ counsel to go present proof of such a bribe and to specifically subpoena the banks that were allegedly involved in laundering the bribe. This was, in a way, to “monopolize” the adult entertainment market. Case Citation : Dangaard v.
In April, Tesla will be back in court over allegations that the company’s autopilot driver-assist software is defective and led to a fatal 2018 car accident that took the life of a former Apple employee in California.
On March 7, 2024, the European Court of Justice (“CJEU”) rendered its judgment in an appeal against a decision of the EU General Court ( C-479/22P ). The CJEU overturned the decision of the General Court. The Court did not decide that the data were personal data simply because OLAF knew who the scientist was.
This news follows Clio’s July 28 announcement that it acquired CalendarRules, an automated court calendaring product. It is Clio’s third acquisition ever, including its 2018 , acquisition of Lexicata , the client relationship management platform that formed the basis of Clio Grow. . Note: I oversee the Startup Alley.].
Not according to a recent survey by the court reporting company Esquire Deposition Solutions , which found that 78% of attorneys plan to continue conducting up to half their depositions virtually in a post-pandemic world. The court reporter can mark and manage the exhibit. People and Process Meet Technology.
Quinn Yeargain Utahns in 2018 approved a slate of ballot measures that legalized medical cannabis, expanded Medicaid, and set up an independent redistricting process. All three reforms had been initiated by citizens, and put on the ballot after a painstaking petition-gathering campaign.
Originally a legal research company, Fastcase has diversified in recent years, launching its Full Court Press publishing arm and acquiring Docket Alarm and Law Street Media in 2018, NextChapter in 2019, and the technology and team of Judicata in 2020. Neither company is new to AI, he pointed out.
Here are my prior years’ lists of the most important developments: 2020 , 2018 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013. Do courts fully reopen or not? Also last year, the Minnesota Supreme Court approved a pilot project to permit “legal paraprofessionals” to provide legal services in certain matters.
“Along the way, she found that by innovating in the area of remote testimony she could help increase access to justice and empower court reporters,” the website says. She has two cofounders in the company: Scott Graff , a software engineer, and Dineen Squillante , a stenographer.
To uncover those violations, reporters reviewed the financial holdings of some 700 federal judges and compared them against tens of thousands of court cases. The data the Journal used was compiled by the Free Law Project , a non-profit that works to provide free and open public access to court data, opinions, filings and other information.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content