This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
“We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did. The Toronto-based company recently closed a $2.1
Today brings news that Gavelytics , a seven-year-old litigation analytics company, is closing its doors effective tomorrow. We built things never before built and answered litigation-related questions never before answerable. The idea struck me, What if, in advance, I could know detailed information about the judge?”
Well before launching CoCounsel this year, it had already launched the powerful neural net search technology AllSearch and had pioneered products such as Compose , to help lawyers draft litigation briefs, and, in 2016 , CARA, the first product to use AI to analyze briefs, which spawned a generation of copycat products.
Ethics, Law & Technology Event Information Provider: Alameda County Bar Association Location: Alameda County Bar Association 1000 Broadway, Suite 480 Oakland, CA 94607 Phone: 510-302-2222 Date: 08/23/2017 12:00 PM - 01:30 PM Credits: 0.5 Light lunch provided.
A first-of-its-kind tool introduced last year to automate the drafting of litigation briefs has been named new product of the year for 2021 by the American Association of Law Libraries. In 2017, the award went to CARA , another first-of-its-kind product that analyzes briefs to find relevant cases they omit. Second Product Award.
A new integration between two litigation-focused legal technology products connects more than 500 million federal and state litigation dockets and documents with a database of expert witness and judicial profiles, with the aim of helping lawyers better evaluate expert witnesses. ”
Developers of artificial intelligence (“AI”) systems notched a victory last week when a federal judge dismissed claims under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (“DMCA”) premised on the use of copyrighted works in AI training data, holding that the plaintiffs had failed to show any concrete harm and therefore lacked standing to bring their claims.
Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. VoiceScript Ai.Law Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. and Beagle.
Pre/Dicta , claiming itself the only litigation analytics platform that makes predictions about the outcome of federal lawsuits, announced the acquisition of Gavelytics, a pioneering judicial analytics platform for state court cases. This deal is a major milestone for Pre/Dicta and the entire field of predictive litigation analytics.
Given that they are litigating 512(f), your wish was partially granted. This opinion suggests this judge would have zero interest in enjoining rightsowners from this practice. Benjamin * How Have Section 512(f) Cases Fared Since 2017? This time, the pugilists are fast-fashion marketplaces Shein and Temu.
Today's TL NewsWire Hot Product enables you to analyze the historical record of experts and judges to inform your case strategy, including an expert's track record on Daubert challenges and citations your judge prefers (see article below). But it's not a good idea when it comes to the expert witnesses and the judges in your cases.
Jason Fyk’s recent litigation campaign reminds me of the classic story Moby Dick, with Fyk in the Captain Ahab role and Section 230 as his white whale. The judge’s response might be characterized as: WTF = What The Fyk? The Netflix documentary of his story will be called “Moby Fyk.” Freedom Def. Initiative v.
Since the first judicial opinion endorsing the use of Technology Assisted Review (or TAR) was written by Judge Andrew J. Finally, courts examined those audit practices producing parties incorporated into their proposed TAR use or those receiving parties raised after the TAR process was complete.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 26, which we posted on Jan. Judges are like the umpires of the courtroom, but litigators lack the information they need to understand the parameters of each umpire’s strike zone. In December, we issued a call for entries. Immediation.
We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “So They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did. What we offer are explanatory insights into judges’ rulings.”
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed down the applications. Note: The ballot was supposed to list 25 companies, but because of a tie in the initial round of voting by judges, 26 companies are listed.). In December, we issued a call for entries. Now your votes will select the final 15. FIND THE BALLOT HERE. .
If the subpoena issued is in federal litigation, your company is likely responsible for the cost of compliance, especially if it has a connection to the litigation. The judge, in that case, applied discovery proportionality factors to figure out whether a subpoena served on Boeing went too far (he concluded it did not).
I reported last summer that the pioneering state litigation analytics company was shutting down. Today’s press release reports that Gavelytics will live again as the core of Pre/Dicta ‘s state court predictive litigation component. said Merrill, who is joining Pre/Dicta as its strategic advisor.
Thus, I always felt the litigation ploy acted as an adverse admission by the plaintiffs. So I guess the judge would credit a large number of plaintiffs with a large enough corpus of compared works to achieve statistically reliable results? The court says the 32/58 video comparison was too small a sample to generate reliable results.
Anyone who has sat through any oral argument knows that interruptions can just be a part of the game, whether those interruptions are by judge or opposing counsel. The SCOTUS blog took a look at data from the 2017 term to identify patterns. The post Pardon the Interruptions appeared first on Liquid Litigation Management.
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. It’s a great failure of our judges, courts and legislatures that they’ve allowed — and continue to allow to this day — commercial entities to mingle their owned commentary with our official law. That’s bunk.
At its core, knowledge management is about finding lawyers who or documents or matters that can answer another lawyer’s questions about law, transactions, regulatory matters, judges, investors, clients, or industries. Why the excitement? At minimum, the market needs better search for just documents.
When UniCourt was founded in 2017 to provide access to court data and analytics, APIs were an afterthought, cofounder Josh Blandi now says. These include analytics on attorneys, law firms, judges, parties and cases. Now, UniCourt has revealed the fruits of that labor, announcing the availability of the new UniCourt Enterprise API.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 26, which we posted on Jan. Judges are like the umpires of the courtroom, but litigators lack the information they need to understand the parameters of each umpire’s strike zone. In December, we issued a call for entries. Immediation.
The Tech Edge JD launched in 2017, inviting law school applicants to apply for a position in the inaugural 2018 incoming cohort. Mark Michels, is a lecturer in law, teaching leadership for lawyers, e-discovery, and patent litigation, at Santa Clara University School of Law. .
On July 4, 2023, a federal judge declared FREEDOM from government censorship of Internet services. Shockingly, the judge ordered the executive branch to stop talking to Internet services about certain issues. The line between the productive and condemnable government engagement is murky and fluid. 3) Supreme Court dodges Section 230.
Rich has served on the Commission on Professionalism since 2017. Rich is an attorney in Holland & Knight’s Chicago and New York offices, the national co-chair of the firm’s Legal Profession Team, and a member of the Litigation and Dispute Resolution practice. She is currently the Chair of the Audit & Finance Committee.
If that wasn’t disturbing enough, a retired Wisconsin judge was recently gunned down outside his home. Litigation and justice proceedings are adversarial by nature and with the stakes involved, often result in amplified fears and feelings of grievance. Litigation, by nature, is an adversarial business. Revenge is the No.
Well before launching CoCounsel this year, it had already launched the powerful neural net search technology AllSearch and had pioneered products such as Compose , to help lawyers draft litigation briefs, and, in 2016 , CARA, the first product to use AI to analyze briefs, which spawned a generation of copycat products.
It made me think of a new opportunity: maybe one day we will have a “Judge Judy” show for the CCB claims! The picture at issue was taken in 2017, and was registered with the U.S. Copyright Office on July 29, 2017. Other cases where Oppenheimer has been a litigant show that he has some licensing history, however minimal.
At ILTACON today, Docket Alarm by Fastcase released Motions in Federal Courts, a unique tool for searching and analyzing motions from almost 5 million cases and for generating analytics around those motions for individual law firms, judges and nature-of-suit codes. ” Two aspects of the new feature make it particularly notable.
When UniCourt was founded in 2017 to provide access to court data and analytics, APIs were an afterthought, cofounder Josh Blandi now says. These include analytics on attorneys, law firms, judges, parties and cases. Now, UniCourt has revealed the fruits of that labor, announcing the availability of the new UniCourt Enterprise API.
837 (1984), created a two-part framework for litigation involving congressional statutory law and regulatory agencies that enforce that law. First, it robs the judiciary from independently interpreting the law because at step-two, Chevron requires federal judges to acquiesce to the reasonable policy interpretations of the federal agency. [10]
Judge Whyte’s ruling has been adopted in all circuits that have considered the issue. Jackson , 2017 WL 5629514, *11 (N.D. In cases litigated within the Ninth Circuit, yes; and many cases are filed in the district courts of the Ninth Circuit because that is where many tech companies are based. Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc. ,
I could imagine what would come—what did come—with predictive analysis platforms like Lex Machina that could equip attorneys with data-driven insights extracted from historical legal records, facilitating informed decision-making throughout various stages of litigation. Basic Books, 2017. Basic Books, 2017. Basic Books, 2017.
From all applications received, a panel of five judges will select 25 finalists. This year’s judges are: Allan MacKenzie, TECHSHOW 2021 co-chair. You were not one of the prior years’ winners selected to present at TECHSHOW in the 2017, 2018, 2019 or 2020 Startup Alley. Roberta Tepper, TECHSHOW 2021 co-chair.
From all applications received, a panel of five judges will select 25 finalists. This year’s judges are: Ivan Hemmans, TECHSHOW 2022 co-chair. You were not one of the prior years’ winners selected to present at TECHSHOW in the 2017, 2018, 2019 or 2020 Startup Alley. Brooke Moore, TECHSHOW 2022 co-chair.
From all applications received, a panel of five judges will select 25 finalists. This year’s judges are: Jeannine Lambert, TECHSHOW 2023 co-chair. You were not one of the prior years’ winners selected to present at Startup Alley in 2017-2022. Startups interested in participating must complete this application form.
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed down the applications. Note: The ballot was supposed to list 25 companies, but because of a tie in the initial round of voting by judges, 26 companies are listed.). In December, we issued a call for entries. Now your votes will select the final 15. FIND THE BALLOT HERE. .
From all the entries we received, a panel of judges narrowed the applications down to 26, which we posted on Jan. Judges are like the umpires of the courtroom, but litigators lack the information they need to understand the parameters of each umpire’s strike zone. In December, we issued a call for entries.
In England and Wales, as many as 4 million iPhone users were impacted by the Safari Workaround, leading to Mr Lloyd—a consumer rights activist—commencing legal proceedings against Google LLC in the English courts in 2017. Google was initially successful before the first instance judge in 2018.
Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. It’s a great failure of our judges, courts and legislatures that they’ve allowed — and continue to allow to this day — commercial entities to mingle their owned commentary with our official law. That’s bunk.
Below are summaries of the semifinalists, who have been selected by a panel of judges from all applications submitted. VoiceScript Elevator Pitch: Provides AI-generated litigation documents, from pleadings to discovery. We are the first AI-driven platform to focus specifically on drafting litigation documents. Anything else?
Unsurprisingly, BIPA has begun to generate significant class action litigation both in Illinois and elsewhere: The Six Flags case, involving use of fingerprint scans for admission to a theme park, resulted in a $36 million settlement. 2019 IL 123186, 129 N.E.3d million settlement. million settlement. See, e.g., Miracle-Pond v. May 15, 2020).
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content