2017 Attorney Case law 
Above the Law - Technology
JUNE 15, 2023
In fact, as I described in my very first post about Casetext , its original vision was a crowdsourced case law library that its users would edit and annotate and then have other users upvote or downvote the annotations. Think a marriage of Wikipedia and Digg, but for law. WellSettled.com Mines Cases for Established Principles.
Above the Law - Technology
DECEMBER 4, 2023
Traction: We are adding about 25 people a day as registrants, having fully launched in late October 2023, and have begun demos with attorneys. Altumatim Elevator Pitch: Altumatim is the story-based eDiscovery platform that fully automates document review and finds the most important evidence by learning the story the attorney wants to tell.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Clio
NOVEMBER 7, 2024
Instead, law firms measure lawyers by the results that they achieve for clients. However, for this fee structure to work, attorneys need to identify the resources required to produce a favorable result. When clients can pay more easily, law firms will more likely get paid.
TechnoLawyer
DECEMBER 16, 2018
The Killer Feature Context grew out of Ravel Law , which LexisNexis acquired in 2017. Ravel Law garnered attention for its judge analytics offering, enabling lawyers to get inside the head of a judge before starting a legal research project. Leveraging its analytics increases the probability of winning a case."
Eric Goldman
MARCH 29, 2023
This is done by a staff attorney. The picture at issue was taken in 2017, and was registered with the U.S. Copyright Office on July 29, 2017. Prutton files an Answer, which appears to be his answer from the court case, as well as a Declaration of Respondent. He appears to take aerial photographs of many different cities.
Technically Legal
MAY 19, 2021
Context leverages machine learning and natural language processing from Ravel, a company LexisNexis acquired in 2017. Context can help identify the case law judges and adversaries rely on the most, and how likely a court is to grant their motions. Context is also a helpful tool outside of the courtroom.
Liquid Litigation Management, Inc.
SEPTEMBER 5, 2018
The SCOTUS blog took a look at data from the 2017 term to identify patterns. One element that they looked for was if gender imbalances in oral argument interruptions of previous years continued in 2017. The same holds true in the Supreme Court. In the past, females were more frequently interrupted than males.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
207 
Let's personalize your content