This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
. “So often when attorneys are writing court documents or preparing for oral arguments and they want to know what their judge thinks about different issues in their case, they have very little information to go off of. ” He distinguished Bench IQ from legal analytics companies such as Lex Machina or Pre/Dicta.
The legal analytics platform Lex Machina has introduced a “fetch” functionality that allows users to request and retrieve specific documents from state court dockets. Full list of covered courts.) The time is takes depends on the court. There is no added cost beyond the user’s subscription.
Called Litigation Footprint, it provides a visual overview of the federal and state courts across the country in which a party has litigated, derived from the litigation histories of parties in over 27 million cases filed in 94 federal district courts and over 1,300 state courts in 34 states and the District of Columbia.
Lawyers have a duty of competency to their client, and candor to the court, to look at what is relevant to their case and responsive to discovery requests. Pomrenke, 2015 U.S. The Court did not buy the argument. That position is wrong. This issue was highlighted in a criminal case where the government produced over 1.9
We help lawyers make evidence-based decisions about the venues they choose and the arguments they make by focusing on the jurisprudence of the judges and courts they interact with. How we’re unique: While other products are descriptive in nature, we are building the first truly prescriptive set of legal analytics products. Immediation.
“So often when attorneys are writing court documents or preparing for oral arguments and they want to know what their judge thinks about different issues in their case, they have very little information to go off of. He distinguished Bench IQ from legal analytics companies such as Lex Machina or Pre/Dicta. federal courts.
In July, 2015, ALM’s Legaltech News last unveiled the winners of the LTN Innovation Awards, an annual recognition of the best legal technology leaders, products and projects in the legal community. Three and a half years have passed and now it's time to once again recognize industry leaders in legal technology innovation.
We help lawyers make evidence-based decisions about the venues they choose and the arguments they make by focusing on the jurisprudence of the judges and courts they interact with. How we’re unique: While other products are descriptive in nature, we are building the first truly prescriptive set of legal analytics products. Immediation.
The values and culture that make Lawmatics one of the best places to work Growth goals for Lawmatics this year Stay tuned for some insights on how technology like AI and predictive analytics will shape the legal landscape. But I was in court all day. They wanted to know when was their next court date and where's my police report?
The legal analytics platform Lex Machina , which is owned by LexisNexis, has added a module for litigation involving claims under the Americans with Disabilities Act, as well as claims under related state laws. . It also includes practice-area specific analytics for damages, remedies, and findings. District Court.
But this year, they seem to span the gamut of topics I cover, from analytics to artificial intelligence, from legal ethics to legal research, from new companies starting up to established companies shutting down, from products designed for litigation to products embroiled in litigation. Jackson Women’s Health Organization.
Or courts or states? I think there’s lots of low hanging groups that that the team and I have been looking at thinking through, and one of them is taking our doctor alarm 775 million judicial opinions, briefs, pleadings, motions that are filed at the district court level, because that’s actually where most of the work is done.
Recent decisions demonstrate the shift in thinking about spoliation claims as courts declined to impose sanctions on companies that have deleted old data in good faith but, in doing so, may have inadvertently deleted information that was relevant to the litigation. See Wai Feng Trading Co. Quick Fitting, Inc. 2019 WL 118412 (D. Wetzel (W.D.
Or courts or states? I think there’s lots of low hanging groups that that the team and I have been looking at thinking through, and one of them is taking our doctor alarm 775 million judicial opinions, briefs, pleadings, motions that are filed at the district court level, because that’s actually where most of the work is done.
That was in sort of 2015. And they were it’s so funny, because what was happening in 2015 2016 is exactly what’s happening that everyone’s going completely bananas about LLMs and AI. You know, I’m a servant of the court. touched on AI. I didn’t really know where it was going. And the market was just exploding. Right, right.
In 2015, she was awarded the Outstanding Innovator by Legal Week, was voted in Legal Personality of the Year and received an Honorary Doctorate of Laws in 2018, and whilst in 2019 recognized as an Outstanding Woman in Law just to name a few. This fearlessness has driven Dana to achieve an extraordinary amount of change in the legal industry.
That was in sort of 2015. And they were it’s so funny, because what was happening in 2015 2016 is exactly what’s happening that everyone’s going completely bananas about LLMs and AI. You know, I’m a servant of the court. touched on AI. I didn’t really know where it was going. And the market was just exploding. Right, right.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content