This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
“We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did. They’re descriptive rather than explanatory.
Well before launching CoCounsel this year, it had already launched the powerful neural net search technology AllSearch and had pioneered products such as Compose , to help lawyers draft litigation briefs, and, in 2016 , CARA, the first product to use AI to analyze briefs, which spawned a generation of copycat products.
We’re trying to solve a longstanding problem in the legal field, and that is that judges only write judicial opinions for 3% of rulings,” Ovbiagele said. “So They tell you what judges have done, but they don’t tell you why judges did what they did. What we offer are explanatory insights into judges’ rulings.”
On July 4, 2023, a federal judge declared FREEDOM from government censorship of Internet services. Shockingly, the judge ordered the executive branch to stop talking to Internet services about certain issues. The line between the productive and condemnable government engagement is murky and fluid. 3) Supreme Court dodges Section 230.
He led the Caselaw Access Project and other work at Harvard’s Library Innovation Lab from 2014 to 2021. Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. Don’t assume judges are always impartial or never prejudiced. Why Even Do This Project?
Well before launching CoCounsel this year, it had already launched the powerful neural net search technology AllSearch and had pioneered products such as Compose , to help lawyers draft litigation briefs, and, in 2016 , CARA, the first product to use AI to analyze briefs, which spawned a generation of copycat products.
The terms of Commissioners Judge Franklin U. I would like to thank Martin Sinclair, Judge Franklin Valderrama, and John O’Reilly for their important role in promoting a more equitable and effective legal profession in Illinois,” said Illinois Supreme Court Justice Elizabeth M. These appointments are effective on January 1, 2024.
Beginning in 2012, after we’d seen a lot of success in helping consumers with debt relief, we started looking at court data to find more consumers to assist in handling their collection litigation and achieving the debt relief they needed.
Judge Whyte’s ruling has been adopted in all circuits that have considered the issue. 431 (2014). In cases litigated within the Ninth Circuit, yes; and many cases are filed in the district courts of the Ninth Circuit because that is where many tech companies are based. Aereo , 573 U.S.
I could imagine what would come—what did come—with predictive analysis platforms like Lex Machina that could equip attorneys with data-driven insights extracted from historical legal records, facilitating informed decision-making throughout various stages of litigation. Oxford University Press, 2014. Oxford University Press, 2014.
He led the Caselaw Access Project and other work at Harvard’s Library Innovation Lab from 2014 to 2021. Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. Don’t assume judges are always impartial or never prejudiced. Why Even Do This Project?
Volunteer your time, whether its on the civil side or on the criminal side, to get into the courtroom and make sure that justice prevails in this litigation. Previously, she served as a judge on the Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District. His advice to lawyers is as follows: Use your law license to become part of the solution.
Looking ahead, Riehl sees potential for Vincent AI to leverage external LLMs like Anthropic’s Claude model as well as their massive dataset of briefs and motions to generate tailored legal arguments statistically likely to persuade specific judges on particular issues. And then if I’m at a firm, is this something for my litigators?
1962 (2014). 2014) (collecting cases). The magistrate judge held that plaintiffs could not prove ownership of four of the songs, because the registration certificates listed the copyright claimant as Music Specialist Publishing [MSP], rather than Music Specialist, Inc. [MSI], 663, 671 (2014)…. 663, 134 S. 3d 120, 124 n.3
Didn’t do a lot of litigation at that point, I was doing a little bit of enforcement. So I started doing that probably 2014, 2015. And just taking that deep breath and talking about it, about my own struggles with it, and trying not to judge myself so much for it. And that’s when my practice really exploded.
Looking ahead, Riehl sees potential for Vincent AI to leverage external LLMs like Anthropic’s Claude model as well as their massive dataset of briefs and motions to generate tailored legal arguments statistically likely to persuade specific judges on particular issues. And then if I’m at a firm, is this something for my litigators?
Law firms that develop expertise in areas like opioid litigation, nursing home negligence, and emerging vehicle technologies will be well-positioned to help clients affected by these issues. One in twenty personal injury cases is resolved in a court of law by a judge or jury ( The Law Dictionary ).
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). In Latest Litigation Gambit, ROSS Files Antitrust Claim Against Thomson Reuters, Alleging Research Monopoly (Jan.
For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. As a result, the rest of the copyright ecosystem has to live with the fallout from AWF’s seemingly reckless and irresponsible litigation strategy. 569 (1994).
For somewhat of a time capsule of the past decade in legal technology, see my prior years’ lists of my most-popular posts: 2020 , 2019 , 2018 , 2017 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 , 2013 , 2012 , 2011 , 2010 ). In Latest Litigation Gambit, ROSS Files Antitrust Claim Against Thomson Reuters, Alleging Research Monopoly (Jan.
5] In a motion passing 3-2 on a party-line vote, the Democratic commissioners removed the Chief Administrative Law Judge (the “ALJ”) from the role of Presiding Officer in Magnuson-Moss rulemaking; Chair Khan or her designee will instead assume the role of Presiding Officer, giving Chair Khan even greater control over future rulemaking efforts. [6]
She then founded the First 100 Years program in 2014, which looks closely at women’s contributions to the legal profession. And then I, then the second part I did litigation and employment. I enjoyed, you know, the kind of people problems, it had a litigation aspect, I liked the fact I ended up going to court quite a lot.
I think it was 2014. And so what was discovered was that there were these meetings between the detective on the case, the prosecutor and the judge, not including the defense at all, and all of that was sealed, but we were able to get access to that. And this is a tough ass judge in Riverside County that was not pulling any punches.
In other words, the court took what used to be an easy prong–all claims were publisher/speaker claims unless they were the statutory exclusions–and issued a blank check to judges to do whatever the hell they want with Section 230 cases. It’s been nice to see some judges finally pushing back on the scheme. In Bride v.
And then the change in January 2014. Two, his DACA pronouncements were responded to or translated as far as within the RCA tool to kind of create a hard line that any immigrant that entered the country after January 1, 2014, would be detained automatically without bond. That gets us into the second period.
Previously in this case, Judge Coogler denied Pornhub’s motion to dismiss, certified a class of plaintiffs, and denied summary judgment to Pornhub. The case got reassigned to a new judge, and Pornhub requested permission to make an interlocutory appeal. The new judge denied this request as well. TikTok ruling.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content