Remove 2014 Remove Hearing Remove Judge
article thumbnail

Why the Avianca ‘Bogus Cases’ News Is Not About Either Generative AI or Lawyers’ Tech Competence

LawSites

We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.”

Lawyer 122
article thumbnail

Understanding Judicial Codes of Conduct: A Guide for Lawyers

Clio

A judicial code of conduct is a set of ethical guidelines ensuring judges uphold integrity, impartiality, and professionalism. These bodies are often composed of judges and legal professionals who understand the nuances of judicial responsibilities and ethics. What is a judicial code of conduct?

Lawyer 52
professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Guest Post: The Caselaw Access Project — Then, Now, Tomorrow

LawSites

He led the Caselaw Access Project and other work at Harvard’s Library Innovation Lab from 2014 to 2021. Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. Don’t assume judges are always impartial or never prejudiced. Why Even Do This Project?

Court 134
article thumbnail

Why the Avianca ‘Bogus Cases’ News Is Not About Either Generative AI or Lawyers’ Tech Competence

Legal Tech Monitor

We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.”

Lawyer 52
article thumbnail

Illinois Supreme Court Appoints New Chair, Vice-Chair, and Commissioners to Commission on Professionalism

Legal Tech Monitor

The terms of Commissioners Judge Franklin U. I would like to thank Martin Sinclair, Judge Franklin Valderrama, and John O’Reilly for their important role in promoting a more equitable and effective legal profession in Illinois,” said Illinois Supreme Court Justice Elizabeth M. These appointments are effective on January 1, 2024.

Court 52
article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit Reaffirms the “Server Test” for Direct Infringement of the Public Display Right — Hunley v. Instagram, LLC (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

For those reasons, I strongly suspect this will not be the last we hear of this case. Judge Whyte’s ruling has been adopted in all circuits that have considered the issue. 431 (2014). One can hear the protests of “that’s socialism!” The Facts The facts are relatively straightforward. Aereo , 573 U.S.

article thumbnail

Guest Post: The Caselaw Access Project — Then, Now, Tomorrow

Legal Tech Monitor

He led the Caselaw Access Project and other work at Harvard’s Library Innovation Lab from 2014 to 2021. Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why. Don’t assume judges are always impartial or never prejudiced. Why Even Do This Project?

Court 52