2014 Defendant Hearing 
Eric Goldman
AUGUST 1, 2023
For those reasons, I strongly suspect this will not be the last we hear of this case. Neither Time nor BuzzFeed was named as a defendant. 431 (2014). In my opinion, however, nothing in the Copyright Act requires that the defendant be in possession or control of that copy in order to be held directly liable for public display.
Legal Tech Monitor
FEBRUARY 1, 2024
Tip – If you don’t hear back from Yelp’s moderators after several days, use the incident review number provided to follow up with Yelp support. to defend the lawyer or the lawyer’s employees or associates against an accusation of wrongful conduct.” Reference one or more violated guidelines or terms of service in the details you add.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
3 Geeks and a Law Blog
OCTOBER 30, 2023
And in doing that, then you’re getting rid of the issues with hallucinations and whatnot, that you hear a lot about that. But we counteract that by prompting by saying, don’t tell us just what we want to hear, tell us what we need to hear. But much like, don’t tell me just what I want to hear, tell me what I need to hear.
Legal Tech Monitor
OCTOBER 30, 2023
And in doing that, then you’re getting rid of the issues with hallucinations and whatnot, that you hear a lot about that. But we counteract that by prompting by saying, don’t tell us just what we want to hear, tell us what we need to hear. But much like, don’t tell me just what I want to hear, tell me what I need to hear.
Debevoise Data Blog
JANUARY 14, 2022
He founded the school’s Center on Privacy & Technology in 2014 and was previously chief counsel to the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology and the Law. In that position, he helped organize oversight hearings on mobile location tracking and biometric privacy.
Eric Goldman
JANUARY 9, 2025
Tomorrow, the Supreme Court will hear the TikTok ban, and Wednesday, the Supreme Court will hear Free Speech Coalition v. The early rounds have not gone well for the defendants in many cases. 9) Supreme Court Tamps Down on Jawboning and Government Social Media Lawsuits. Paxton regarding mandatory age authentication.
Eric Goldman
MAY 26, 2025
The court says this isn’t a dispositive issue because “Judge Coogler would have come to the conclusion that Defendants were content providers and thus not entitled to immunity under Section 230 even if he had not considered Anderson.” TikTok ruling. This is both a Section 230 AND First Amendment issue. ” Say what?
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content