This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
In fact, as I described in my very first post about Casetext , its original vision was a crowdsourced caselaw library that its users would edit and annotate and then have other users upvote or downvote the annotations. Think a marriage of Wikipedia and Digg, but for law. WellSettled.com Mines Cases for Established Principles.
We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.”
He led the Caselaw Access Project and other work at Harvard’s Library Innovation Lab from 2014 to 2021. He works currently at TrueLaw, which helps law firms use AI to improve their operations and services. Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why.
We may know more after June 8, the date on which the judge in the case, Mata v. Avianca , has scheduled a hearing to allow the lawyers to show cause for why they should not be sanctioned for what the judge called “an unprecedented circumstance” of a brief “replete with citations to non-existent cases.”
In fact, as I described in my very first post about Casetext , its original vision was a crowdsourced caselaw library that its users would edit and annotate and then have other users upvote or downvote the annotations. Think a marriage of Wikipedia and Digg, but for law. WellSettled.com Mines Cases for Established Principles.
The legislative history also expressed an intent to retain existing caselaw on vicarious liability of a principal for the acts of its agents, including independent contractors. Judge Whyte’s ruling has been adopted in all circuits that have considered the issue. 431 (2014). 94-1476 , at 61 (1976). 94-1476, at 159-60.
He led the Caselaw Access Project and other work at Harvard’s Library Innovation Lab from 2014 to 2021. He works currently at TrueLaw, which helps law firms use AI to improve their operations and services. Court decisions are public information — they’re authored by judges and issued publicly to tell us what the law is, and why.
Looking ahead, Riehl sees potential for Vincent AI to leverage external LLMs like Anthropic’s Claude model as well as their massive dataset of briefs and motions to generate tailored legal arguments statistically likely to persuade specific judges on particular issues. And so here, you’re gonna see one paragraph per case.
Suzi also points out the prospective client does not care about caselaw – it’s important to focus on what they do care about, which is meeting their needs and building a relationship with them. So I started doing that probably 2014, 2015. And that’s when my practice really exploded.
Looking ahead, Riehl sees potential for Vincent AI to leverage external LLMs like Anthropic’s Claude model as well as their massive dataset of briefs and motions to generate tailored legal arguments statistically likely to persuade specific judges on particular issues. And so here, you’re gonna see one paragraph per case.
Oracle software case. (See See my commentary on that case here.) For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc. , 569 (1994).
And then the change in January 2014. Two, his DACA pronouncements were responded to or translated as far as within the RCA tool to kind of create a hard line that any immigrant that entered the country after January 1, 2014, would be detained automatically without bond. That gets us into the second period.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 5,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content