Remove 2014 Remove Case law Remove Defendant
article thumbnail

Launching Today, Tangibly is First Platform to Systematically Manage A Company’s Trade Secrets

LawSites

gross domestic product, according to a 2014 report by the Center for Responsible Enterprise and Trade and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Yet a 2017 study by law firm Baker McKenzie found that less than a third of companies maintain inventories of trade secrets and have action plans for responding to theft.

article thumbnail

Ninth Circuit Reaffirms the “Server Test” for Direct Infringement of the Public Display Right — Hunley v. Instagram, LLC (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

Neither Time nor BuzzFeed was named as a defendant. The legislative history also expressed an intent to retain existing case law on vicarious liability of a principal for the acts of its agents, including independent contractors. 431 (2014). See the screenshot on the right). 94-1476 , at 61 (1976). 94-1476, at 159-60.

professionals

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Launching Today, Tangibly is First Platform to Systematically Manage A Company’s Trade Secrets

LawSites

gross domestic product, according to a 2014 report by the Center for Responsible Enterprise and Trade and PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Yet a 2017 study by law firm Baker McKenzie found that less than a third of companies maintain inventories of trade secrets and have action plans for responding to theft.

article thumbnail

vLex’s Damien Riehl on Examining vLex’s New Vincent AI (TGIR Ep. 227)

3 Geeks and a Law Blog

And then once you’ve given me the answer, then go into the case law discussion, that is provide one paragraph per case. And so here, you’re gonna see one paragraph per case. And it talks about these various cases that are here. And give me the answer right up top right. So so it does language really well.

Judge 130
article thumbnail

vLex’s Damien Riehl on Examining vLex’s New Vincent AI (TGIR Ep. 227)

Legal Tech Monitor

And then once you’ve given me the answer, then go into the case law discussion, that is provide one paragraph per case. And so here, you’re gonna see one paragraph per case. And it talks about these various cases that are here. And give me the answer right up top right. So so it does language really well.

Judge 52
article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Eric Goldman

To fully understand these conflicting views of the majority opinion, it is necessary to understand both the specific facts of the case and the history of the Supreme Court’s case law concerning the fair-use doctrine. See Jessica Silbey, The Eureka Myth: Creators, Innovators, and Intellectual Property (2014).

Court 98